The Rule 90%

franchise24

Banned
AnabolicLab.com Supporter
I know I have spoken with a few here about heavy lifting and working on strength 1st before moving into aesthetics should be the foundation of any lifter or athlete. Whether your goal is to get Bigger, Stronger or Faster heavy lifting should be your foundation. I do understand that people have injuries that prevent them from performing max effort lifts. For those that don't have any serious injuries need to build that foundation of strength 1st with heavy compound movements. Squats(Any variation) Deadlifts(Any Variation) Bench Press(Flat Bench) I only put flat bench because incline places more stress on the shoulders. For an athlete we don't want that stress. But you can do close grip bench press floor presses etc. Now for the weight lifter Incline is fine just take special care of your shoulders.

The Rule of 90%

by Tony Gentilcore | 10/31/06

The-Rule-of-90.png







On the one hand, we have those who continue to utilize sub-maximal loads (3 x 10, 5 x 5, etc.) for every movement, and are still benching the same weight now as they did two years ago.
On the other hand, we have those who consistently incorporate lifts at or above 90% of their 1RM into their training, and understand how crucial they are in terms of getting bigger, stronger, and enhancing athletic performance.
That being said:
If you're happy with the fact that you've been training for over five years and can only deadlift 275 pounds, this article isn't for you. Stop reading now and find a new hobby. Coin collecting perhaps?
If you wish to learn how and why incorporating The Rule of 90% will lead to increased strength gains, increased lean body mass, improved athletic performance, and make girls want to hang out with you, then keep reading.
The CNS: Cliffs Notes Version

When a motor neuron fires, all the fibers it serves are simultaneously activated and develop force. A motor neuron and all the muscle fibers it innervates are referred to as a motor unit, the basic functional entity of muscular activity.
Motor units can span a range of muscle fiber sizes (Type I and Type IIa/b), which also allow different force productions. Motor units are recruited in the order of their size, from smallest (Type I) to largest (Type Iib) depending on the force they must produce.
image009.jpg

For example, when you do light load resistance training, you're recruiting predominantly Type I (slow twitch) motor units. When the load is increased, the Type Iia (fast twitch oxidative and glycolytic fibers) will be recruited with the help of the Type I fibers. When high intensity loads are utilized (90%+), the Type IIb muscle fibers (along with Type I and Type IIa) are recruited in order to produce enough force to complete the lift.

Very simply put, getting stronger is really about making the CNS more efficient at stimulating high(er) threshold motor units, maximizing the number of motor units activated, and improving the discharge frequency of those motor units. Typically, to get to a high-threshold motor unit, all the motor units below it are sequentially recruited.
Thus, with heavy resistance training, all the muscle fibers get bigger, because they're all recruited to produce more and more force with heavier weights. (This is assuming, of course, that you're getting sufficient volume in your training.)
In short, like Ron Burgundy, the CNS is kind of a big deal. As a matter of fact, during the early phases (two to eight weeks) of resistance training, a trainee's strength gains can be solely attributed to improved CNS development (not muscle growth). This is due to:


  1. Increased inhibition of antagonistic muscle
  2. Improved co-contraction and increased activation of synergistic muscles
  3. Inhibition of neural protective mechanisms (Golgi tendon body, muscle spindle complex)
  4. Increased motor neuron excitability


That's not to say there isn't any lean body mass gain during the initial stages of resistance training, but it's definitely not as profound as you may think.
Okay, How Can I Get Stronger?

In his book, Science and Practice of Strength Training, Vladmir Zatsiorsky states that there are essentially four methods to developing strength:


  1. Lifting a maximal load (exercising against maximal resistance): the maximal effort method.
  2. Lifting a non-maximal load to failure, with the muscles developing the maximum force possible in a fatigued state during the final repetitions: the repeated effort method.
  3. Lifting (or throwing) a non-maximal load with the highest attainable speed: the dynamic effort method.
  4. By not being an asshat who perform squats on a BOSU ball.


For the sake of this article, I'm going to focus mainly on the maximal effort method (loads at 90% or above your 1RM), because I feel that this is the one area many people tend to neglect.
But First...

Repeated Effort Method (a.k.a. What most people perform): While it's well known that muscles with a large physiological cross-sectional area produce higher forces than similar muscles with a smaller cross-section, this doesn't necessarily equate to improved strength. How can this be?
Well, for starters, you can only go so far with three sets of ten (repeated effort method). I consider it a natural progression for trainee's to start with something like three sets of ten because it establishes a foundation. It allows for initial neural adaptations (as alluded to above), strengthens connective tissue (tendons and ligaments), and also builds some lean muscle mass to boot.
More often than not, this leads to what's called sarcoplasmic hypertrophy, which is characterized by the growth of sarcoplasm and non-contractile proteins that don't directly contribute to production of force.
From there, most trainees will gravitate toward a 5 x 5 or possibly an 8 x 3 program (still the repeated effort method, albeit a bit more strength-training based). Again, this would be a natural progression. During this time, you're drastically improving your CNS efficiency (remember, heavier loads target higher threshold motor units), as well as improving myofibrillar hypertrophy. This form of hypertrophy is characterized by growth of the actual contractile proteins, actin and myosin.
image018.gif

The key point to take home is that while the repeated effort method is valuable in the grand scheme of things, it's also limited. Only the final lifts, in which a maximal number of motor units are recruited, are actually useful (from a strength standpoint).

And as my elaborate drawings above demonstrate (don't ask me how long it took to draw these), just because someone is big doesn't necessarily mean that they're strong. Yes, I'm talking to you, Mr. Quarter-Squat, bodybuilder guy.
Why You Should Lift Heavy Things

I can't stress this enough: the CNS is the key to strength gains. Muscular strength is not only determined by the quantity of muscle mass (cross-sectional area), but also by the extent to which you can improve intramuscular coordination.
Intramuscular coordination is the extent to which individual muscle fibers are voluntarily activated to produce muscle force production. There are essentially three ways to do this:


  1. Recruitment:  As I alluded to above, the order in which motor units are recruited is controlled by the size of the motor neurons (the so-called size principle). Sorry fellas, this is one instance where size does matter.

    Small motor neurons, those with the lowest firing threshold, are recruited first. Motor units with the largest motor neurons and highest threshold are recruited last. Full fast twitch MU recruitment is rather hard to achieve in untrained individuals. Incorporating lifts above 90% can improve this drastically because more force is required (hence more MU recruitment) to complete the lift.
  2. Rate Coding:  This is another method for improving the degree of muscle force. In simple terms, rate coding just refers to the frequency that MU's fire. Generally speaking, the firing rate rises with increased force and power production. Force is increased significantly by high(er) intensity resistance training between 80% and 100%.
  3. Synchronization:  Under normal circumstances, MU's work asynchronously. However, there's some evidence that MU's are activated synchronously (together) during maximal voluntary efforts (90%+).


Why You Should Lift Heavy Things (Part II)

Additionally, for those only interested in aesthetics and thinking, "Tony, I only want to be jacked; I could care less about strength," consider the following:
Say your current 1RM in the bench press is 225 pounds. If you're only interested in aesthetics, you'll typically train in the 70% to 80% 1RM range, which would mean you'd be using anywhere from 160 to 180 pounds for 8-12 reps.
For the next three months, you decide to get generally stronger (incorporating lifts above 90%) and happen to increase your 1RM to 275. What used to be 80% of your 1RM (180 pounds), is now 65%. When you inevitably decide to return back to a hypertrophy based program, 70%-80% of your 1RM is now 190-220 pounds! It stands to reason you'll pack on a significant amount of muscle.
Moreover, in boys and younger men with two or more years of training experience, it's been shown that utilizing heavy resistance training (85% to 95% of 1RM) seems to be one of the key factors that influences acute serum Testosterone concentrations following exercise. I don't recall hearing many reasons why increasing your Testosterone levels would be a bad thing, unless of course you're a woman who happens to have an unwanted penis.
In a nutshell, lifting maximal weight (90%+) has a number of effects:


  1. Maximum number of MU's are recruited
  2. Fastest MU's are activated
  3. The discharge frequency (rate coding) is increased
  4. Activity is synchronous
  5. Improved coordination between synergistic muscles
  6. Potential for future hypertrophy gains
  7. Increased serum Testosterone levels


What About Athletic Performance?

You've probably noticed me using the words "power" and "force" quite a bit, and with good reason. Both play crucial roles in developing strength andathletic performance. Power simply refers to the ability to apply a lot of force in a minimum amount of time (Power = Force x Velocity). In order to improve power, you need to increase force and/or velocity.
Interesting to note, from a velocity standpoint, it's been shown that power output increases as the weight lifted decreases from 100% of 1RM to 90% of 1RM. In fact, for the back squat and deadlift, power output for a load at 90% 1RM may be twice as high as the 1RM load due to the large decrease in the time required to complete the exercise with the lighter load (1).
This obviously shows how velocity plays an important role and why using the dynamic effort method is a great way to improve strength. Optimal speed and power can only be maintained for approximately six seconds. Anything more and lactic acid accumulates and the additional hydrogen ions interfere with the contraction of the fast twitch muscle fibers.
In his book, The Vertical Jump Development Bible, Kelly Baggett talks about how the vertical jump is one of the best predictors of athletic performance. Essentially, how much force you can generate in a short amount of time (0.2 seconds for the vertical jump) is going to separate a superb athlete from an average athlete.
Because I'm more of a visual learner, I'm going to share an example from Kelly's book:
Athlete A (175 lbs) Athlete B (175 lbs)
Maximum force or strength without time constraint (squat)
400 lbs 300 lbs
Max force put out in the vertical jump (0.2 sec)
200 lbs 225 lbs

As you can see, athlete A can squat more than athlete B, but athlete B is going to have a better vertical jump because he can generate more force, rapidly. However, Kelly makes a point in stating that, "Although being able to apply force rapidly is a very useful characteristic, you still need to have enough potential force to tap into for anything to happen. Basically, a strong athlete will beat a weak athlete any day of the week."
Maximum strength is the foundation for everything (power, strength endurance, force development, etc.). You can't have strength endurance (being able to lift a sub-maximal weight repeatedly) or generate maximum force without first having strength.
Here's another example from Kelly's book to help illustrate this point:
Weak Athlete (200 lbs) Ideal Athlete (175 lbs)
Maximum Force (Strength) in the Squat
100 lbs 95 lbs
Max Force in the Vertical Jump
400 lbs 325 lbs

The weak athlete is able to utilize 95% of his potential force and has a good rate of force development; however, he's only able to squat 100 pounds. He has very little to "tap into" and is only able to generate 95 pounds of force off the ground. Needless to say, he's going to be that guy who's lowering his adjustable rim in his driveway to eight feet so he can dunk a basketball.
The "ideal" athlete is only utilizing 75% of his potential force (20% less than the weak athlete), but is generating 325 pounds of force off the ground because he's strong. Again, strength is the foundation for everything. More specifically, relative strength trumps absolute strength from an athletic standpoint.
How to Apply the Rule of 90%

For my own peace of mind, I provided the following list of exercises that would be acceptable to use, questionable to use, and well, just plain dumb to use. This certainly isn't an all encompassing list, but I think you get the general idea:
Acceptable Exercises
Squat Variations (back, front, Anderson, box)
Deadlift Variations (conventional, sumo, against chains)
Bench Variations (standard, floor, board, chains)

Questionable Exercises (probably not the best choice, but "doable")
Good Mornings (cambered bar, chain suspended, etc.)
Dips
Romanian Deadlifts
Overhead Pressing

You deserve to be drop-kicked for even thinking about performing these with 90%
Biceps Curls
Leg Curls
Calf Raises
Weighted Sit-Ups

It's no surprise the best movements to use are the basic "money" exercises (squat, bench, deadlift). Also, be cognizant that "more is not better." Like many trainers and strength coaches, I like to set up programming where volume/intensity is fluctuated each week to coincide with CNS fatigue and/or to stave off overtraining. Lifts above 90% are very CNS intensive and are not something where you're going to need (or want) to do a lot of volume with each and every week.
That being said, you should limit your training sessions at 90%+ to seven to nine PER MONTH. Beginner and intermediate lifters could probably get away with more sessions per week above 90%, but as one gets more "advanced" twice per week is plenty. The following is sample three day split. Please note that I purposely left out specific sets/reps for all the accessory movements because everything would all depend on the weaknesses or imbalances of each individual.
Training Session #1

Exercise Wk 1 Wk 2 Wk 3 Wk 4
A
Squat Variation 5 @ 90%+ 4 @ 90%+
A
Deadlift Variation 7 @ 90%+ 3 @ 90%+ or Reps
B1
Vertical Push
B2
Lower Body Unilateral
C1
Horizontal Row
C2
Tricep Movement
D
Rotator Cuff/Core Work

Training Session #2

Exercise Wk 1 Wk 2 Wk 3 Wk 4
A
Horizontal Press (DB)
B1
Horizontal Row
B2
Lower Body Unilateral
C1
Vertical Pull
C2
Lower Body Iso-Metric Hold
D
Rotator Cuff/Core Work

Training Session #3

Exercise Wk 1 Wk 2 Wk 3 Wk 4
A
Bench Variation 5 @ 90%+ 4 @ 90%+ 7 @ 90%+ 3 @ 90%+ or Reps
B1
Horizontal Push
B2
Horizontal Row
C1
Lower Body Unilateral
C2
Bicep
D
Rotator Cuff/Core Work

Conclusion

There are many reasons to incorporate lifts above 90% into your training. I think many lifters are experiencing their own Choose Your Own Adventurewhen it comes to their training, and they're getting less than stellar results.
You can either choose to keep doing what you're doing and not make any progress, or you can choose to embark on a new adventure and take your body to places it's never been before. The choice is yours.
References



  1. Baechle, T., Earle, R., and Wathen, D. Resistance Training.. In: Essentials of Strength and Conditioning (2nd Ed.) Baechle, T.R., Earle, R.W.., ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2000.
 
Interesting - a couple questions:

Why no mention of lat pulldowns at all?

Why "questionable" for dips, many consider that one of the core exercises.

Also, any suggestion on ideal (if there is such a thing) approach to get to the magical 90%+ set? Some say 5-8 reps, others like more of a pyramid with high volume, low weight in the beginning, then close with a high weight, lower rep set to failure.
 
T
Interesting - a couple questions:

Why no mention of lat pulldowns at all?

Why "questionable" for dips, many consider that one of the core exercises.

Also, any suggestion on ideal (if there is such a thing) approach to get to the magical 90%+ set? Some say 5-8 reps, others like more of a pyramid with high volume, low weight in the beginning, then close with a high weight, lower rep set to failure.
he 90% rule is based off of your 1 rep max. When working with max weights you want to stay away from failure. This 90% rule is for compound movements such as bench deadlift squat. Or incline bench fronts sumo deadlift. That is why lat pulldowns aren't mentioned. This article is based on powerlifting. So dips and lat pulldowns are accessory movements that will assist to strengthen the main movements. Or they are also called body building movements. I hope I cleared that up for you.
 
Thanks, I get the 90% concept, I was curious if there's a preferred way to get to the 90% in a workout session - i.e. do 2 sets at 60% with high rep (20 reps) count to get the blood going, then 1 set at 80% at lower rep count, before going to a set in the 90% range (6 reps?) and then pyramid back down, or quickly do a drop set? Just trying to get into the tactics of this.

Also, about dips, I think they're quite applicable to powerlifters too - see article below.



Training Articles

The Most Valuable Exercise You’re Not Doing

dips.jpg


Although there has been a recent upsurge in the popularity of chin-ups, there hasn’t been as much enthusiasm for parallel bar dips. Bodybuilders say it tears apart the shoulders, personal trainers say it’s too difficult for most of their clients, and strength coaches complain that it’s not sport specific. It’s time to look at the facts and fallacies about an exercise that was once a staple in athletic and physical fitness programs.

If you go back to the early days when YMCAs were the gym of choice, you’ll find that dip stations were often available – or, perhaps, gymnastic parallel bars. But now, except for those revolutionary “suspension rings” that have been hitting the strength circuit, gymnastic equipment and dedicated dip machines simply are not available. At least, with chin-ups you can use a crossbar in a power rack. However, even if you wanted to perform dips, you are now lacking the means to do them.

When you think of dips, you usually think of chins. When dips are combined with chin-ups, as they often were in bygone days, you have a great upper body combo. Even if you don’t do a single fly, pulldown, triceps pressdown or biceps curl – you can develop great upper body strength and muscle mass with chins and dips. Want proof? Just look at the upper body development of gymnasts, whose conditioning programs usually never include barbells and dumbbells. Chins and dips are, you might say, exercises that give you the most “bang for your buck.” And the old-time bodybuilders knew this – especially Brooklyn’s Marvin Eder.

Eder’s most significant bodybuilding accomplishment was placing third in the 1951 AAU Mr. America, considered one of the most prestigious competitions at the time. He weighed 198 pounds at 5-feet-8 and sported 19-inch arms. As with many bodybuilders in his era, Eder complemented his muscle building workouts with Olympic lifts and power lifts. Pound-for-pound, Eder had few equals. Among his most notable strength feats were a 355-pound clean and press, 285 snatch, 345 clean and jerk (with a 365 clean), 665 full squat and (just for fun) 300 pounds for squats for 50 reps! But it was his upper body strength that was especially impressive. Here are some of his lifts: bench press 515 (raw); wide-grip chins, 8 reps with 80 pounds; 8 consecutive one-arm chins with one arm; and a parallel bar dip with 400 pounds for 7 reps and one rep with an additional 434 pounds (accomplished by having two men hang from his feet).

In the area of muscular endurance, in 1954 Jack La LaLanne completed 1,000 vertical dips in less than 35 minutes without leaving the bars. Although Simon Kent completed 3,989 dips in 1998 for a Guinness World Record, consider that the video of his performance showing that his arms never came close to being parallel to the floor.

Powerlifters used to be big on dips. Pat Casey, the first man to officially bench press 600 pounds (raw), weighed 340 pounds and could perform a parallel bar dip with an additional 380 pounds. However, now that bench shirts help with the drive off the chest, the exercise has been replaced in favor of board or towel presses. Although pressdowns and French presses are fine for bodybuilders, as they offer different recruitment patterns, such isolation movements are not nearly as effective as dips. But the primary reason most athletes avoid dips is laziness – they are hard work!

Dipping Science
As for terminology, the standing position is with the arms extended so that the body is balanced by the hands on the bars. The movement begins with the triceps contracting to control the descent of the movement. As with the descent of the bench press, the descent in dips must be controlled to avoid injury. Dr. Richard Dominguez, an orthopedic surgeon who co-authored Total Body Training with bodybuilding champion Bob Gajda, said that rapid descent in the bench press was a primary cause of injury among his bodybuilding clientele who required shoulder surgery.

Dips work the anterior shoulders, pectorals and triceps – many of the same muscle groups worked by the bench press. In any list of best-ever triceps exercises, it would be hard-pressed to find one equal to dips. According to MRI research by Per A. Tesch, PhD, dips are superior to close-grip bench presses for developing all three heads of the triceps. As a bonus, the trapezius and many other back muscles are involved in dips to provide stability. Dips are hard work, and women and heavier individuals often have trouble performing a single repetition. Let’s start with the easy way out. If you are not strong enough to do dips, there are many variations of dip-assisting machines that will help you. With some designs you stand on a footplate, and with others have you kneel on a platform. With these devices the platform connects with a pulley mechanism to a weight stack. Increasing the weight in turn produces more upward force to the platform, such that virtually anyone can perform the exercise through a full range of motion. However, you don’t need a high-tech machine to do dips.

Here are two variations of dips that don’t require the use of machines: (1) Starting with the arms extended in the locked position, flex one knee and have a training partner grasp that ankle and provide as much assistance as needed – be careful not to knee your training partner. (2) Stand inside a power rack and place a barbell across the safety pins, set slightly above mid-thigh level. Bend one knee and place your ankle across the barbell-this will serve to reduce the amount of weight your upper body must lift. Both of these variations effectively reduce the amount of weight your upper body must lift.

Bodybuilding guru Vince Gironda recommended using a reverse grip (palms facing away from the body) in dips. The trainee would round the upper back, chin to chest, elbows pointed straight out, feet together, toes pointed down and under the face. Such a variation is a bit harsh on the shoulders. Regarding those who encounter shoulder injuries from dips, the problem often can be traced to structural imbalances. Further, dips are best performed on a V-shaped dip apparatus, which accommodates a greater variety of body types.

As your dipping strength increases, you will need to increase resistance by (1) having a training partner pull down on your ankles, (2) holding a dumbbell between your ankles or (3) using a chin/dip belt (although the belts used by mountain climbers can also be used for this purpose). Holding a dumbbell securely is more difficult to coordinate compared to using the belt, and eventually the weights you will use on this exercise will become too heavy to hold in this manner.

Another great variation is to attach lifting chains to a chin-dip belt, as the chains will make the exercise more difficult at the top of the movement where you are strongest.

Dips are a great exercise for bodybuilders, powerlifters and anyone who just wants to be strong. For old times’ sake, at least give this “old school” exercise a chance – you might just love it!

The Most Valuable Exercise You’re Not Doing
 
Thanks, I get the 90% concept, I was curious if there's a preferred way to get to the 90% in a workout session - i.e. do 2 sets at 60% with high rep (20 reps) count to get the blood going, then 1 set at 80% at lower rep count, before going to a set in the 90% range (6 reps?) and then pyramid back down, or quickly do a drop set? Just trying to get into the tactics of this.

Also, about dips, I think they're quite applicable to powerlifters too - see article below.



Training Articles

The Most Valuable Exercise You’re Not Doing

dips.jpg


Although there has been a recent upsurge in the popularity of chin-ups, there hasn’t been as much enthusiasm for parallel bar dips. Bodybuilders say it tears apart the shoulders, personal trainers say it’s too difficult for most of their clients, and strength coaches complain that it’s not sport specific. It’s time to look at the facts and fallacies about an exercise that was once a staple in athletic and physical fitness programs.

If you go back to the early days when YMCAs were the gym of choice, you’ll find that dip stations were often available – or, perhaps, gymnastic parallel bars. But now, except for those revolutionary “suspension rings” that have been hitting the strength circuit, gymnastic equipment and dedicated dip machines simply are not available. At least, with chin-ups you can use a crossbar in a power rack. However, even if you wanted to perform dips, you are now lacking the means to do them.

When you think of dips, you usually think of chins. When dips are combined with chin-ups, as they often were in bygone days, you have a great upper body combo. Even if you don’t do a single fly, pulldown, triceps pressdown or biceps curl – you can develop great upper body strength and muscle mass with chins and dips. Want proof? Just look at the upper body development of gymnasts, whose conditioning programs usually never include barbells and dumbbells. Chins and dips are, you might say, exercises that give you the most “bang for your buck.” And the old-time bodybuilders knew this – especially Brooklyn’s Marvin Eder.

Eder’s most significant bodybuilding accomplishment was placing third in the 1951 AAU Mr. America, considered one of the most prestigious competitions at the time. He weighed 198 pounds at 5-feet-8 and sported 19-inch arms. As with many bodybuilders in his era, Eder complemented his muscle building workouts with Olympic lifts and power lifts. Pound-for-pound, Eder had few equals. Among his most notable strength feats were a 355-pound clean and press, 285 snatch, 345 clean and jerk (with a 365 clean), 665 full squat and (just for fun) 300 pounds for squats for 50 reps! But it was his upper body strength that was especially impressive. Here are some of his lifts: bench press 515 (raw); wide-grip chins, 8 reps with 80 pounds; 8 consecutive one-arm chins with one arm; and a parallel bar dip with 400 pounds for 7 reps and one rep with an additional 434 pounds (accomplished by having two men hang from his feet).

In the area of muscular endurance, in 1954 Jack La LaLanne completed 1,000 vertical dips in less than 35 minutes without leaving the bars. Although Simon Kent completed 3,989 dips in 1998 for a Guinness World Record, consider that the video of his performance showing that his arms never came close to being parallel to the floor.

Powerlifters used to be big on dips. Pat Casey, the first man to officially bench press 600 pounds (raw), weighed 340 pounds and could perform a parallel bar dip with an additional 380 pounds. However, now that bench shirts help with the drive off the chest, the exercise has been replaced in favor of board or towel presses. Although pressdowns and French presses are fine for bodybuilders, as they offer different recruitment patterns, such isolation movements are not nearly as effective as dips. But the primary reason most athletes avoid dips is laziness – they are hard work!

Dipping Science
As for terminology, the standing position is with the arms extended so that the body is balanced by the hands on the bars. The movement begins with the triceps contracting to control the descent of the movement. As with the descent of the bench press, the descent in dips must be controlled to avoid injury. Dr. Richard Dominguez, an orthopedic surgeon who co-authored Total Body Training with bodybuilding champion Bob Gajda, said that rapid descent in the bench press was a primary cause of injury among his bodybuilding clientele who required shoulder surgery.

Dips work the anterior shoulders, pectorals and triceps – many of the same muscle groups worked by the bench press. In any list of best-ever triceps exercises, it would be hard-pressed to find one equal to dips. According to MRI research by Per A. Tesch, PhD, dips are superior to close-grip bench presses for developing all three heads of the triceps. As a bonus, the trapezius and many other back muscles are involved in dips to provide stability. Dips are hard work, and women and heavier individuals often have trouble performing a single repetition. Let’s start with the easy way out. If you are not strong enough to do dips, there are many variations of dip-assisting machines that will help you. With some designs you stand on a footplate, and with others have you kneel on a platform. With these devices the platform connects with a pulley mechanism to a weight stack. Increasing the weight in turn produces more upward force to the platform, such that virtually anyone can perform the exercise through a full range of motion. However, you don’t need a high-tech machine to do dips.

Here are two variations of dips that don’t require the use of machines: (1) Starting with the arms extended in the locked position, flex one knee and have a training partner grasp that ankle and provide as much assistance as needed – be careful not to knee your training partner. (2) Stand inside a power rack and place a barbell across the safety pins, set slightly above mid-thigh level. Bend one knee and place your ankle across the barbell-this will serve to reduce the amount of weight your upper body must lift. Both of these variations effectively reduce the amount of weight your upper body must lift.

Bodybuilding guru Vince Gironda recommended using a reverse grip (palms facing away from the body) in dips. The trainee would round the upper back, chin to chest, elbows pointed straight out, feet together, toes pointed down and under the face. Such a variation is a bit harsh on the shoulders. Regarding those who encounter shoulder injuries from dips, the problem often can be traced to structural imbalances. Further, dips are best performed on a V-shaped dip apparatus, which accommodates a greater variety of body types.

As your dipping strength increases, you will need to increase resistance by (1) having a training partner pull down on your ankles, (2) holding a dumbbell between your ankles or (3) using a chin/dip belt (although the belts used by mountain climbers can also be used for this purpose). Holding a dumbbell securely is more difficult to coordinate compared to using the belt, and eventually the weights you will use on this exercise will become too heavy to hold in this manner.

Another great variation is to attach lifting chains to a chin-dip belt, as the chains will make the exercise more difficult at the top of the movement where you are strongest.

Dips are a great exercise for bodybuilders, powerlifters and anyone who just wants to be strong. For old times’ sake, at least give this “old school” exercise a chance – you might just love it!

The Most Valuable Exercise You’re Not Doing
Dips are applicable to powerlifters as it builds strength in the triceps. But it isn't a main lift for powerlifters. It's used as an accessory lift to help with the bench. And to work your way up to 90% you should know your one rep max. Multiple your rep max by 90% and you'll have the number you need. You will have to warm your way up to that number. As you get closer you will need more rest time between sets and you should only do singles. Do you know your 1 rep max of your bench? I ask so I can give you a template.
 
Dips are applicable to powerlifters as it builds strength in the triceps. But it isn't a main lift for powerlifters. It's used as an accessory lift to help with the bench. And to work your way up to 90% you should know your one rep max. Multiple your rep max by 90% and you'll have the number you need. You will have to warm your way up to that number. As you get closer you will need more rest time between sets and you should only do singles. Do you know your 1 rep max of your bench? I ask so I can give you a template.

I never do any 1 rep max lifts - I'm not competing, and I'm not interested in injuries, I mostly work out alone so if I don't think I can do at least 4, ideally 6, I won't try.

That said, I've looked at the charts (here's one: Calculate Your One-Rep Max (1RM)) that infer the max from the number of reps done - my squat for example, where I can do 365 for 6, supposedly this means my 1RM is 429.

So you're saying that I should pyramid up to a single rep @386 in squatting?

I might have made an interesting observation - if I insist on "my" approach of always doing 4-6 reps with the heaviest weight, it looks like I'm never hitting the 90% level. :-(
 
I never do any 1 rep max lifts - I'm not competing, and I'm not interested in injuries, I mostly work out alone so if I don't think I can do at least 4, ideally 6, I won't try.

That said, I've looked at the charts (here's one: Calculate Your One-Rep Max (1RM)) that infer the max from the number of reps done - my squat for example, where I can do 365 for 6, supposedly this means my 1RM is 429.

So you're saying that I should pyramid up to a single rep @386 in squatting?

I might have made an interesting observation - if I insist on "my" approach of always doing 4-6 reps with the heaviest weight, it looks like I'm never hitting the 90% level. :-(
You actually are hitting that 90% in terms of force exertion even if you aren't doing a single for 90%. I lift by myself and use the power rack with safety arms if I fail.
 
90% of 1RM or more is generally going to be 3 reps or less of all out effort. Maybe 4 reps at 90% at the very most. You really don't want to be going all out at that high of percentage often though.

According to Prilepin's Chart about 4 reps at 90+ percentage is going to be optimal.

Prilepins-Chart.png


So 2x2 @RPE 9 (~90%) or 4x1 @RPE 8 (~90%) or maybe 2-3x1 @RPE9 (~95%) is going to be about what you're looking for in that range.

As far as ramping up to that I prefer using 3 or less reps all the way up, 5 at most with the lighter weights.

Using the 429 max squat as an example

Bar x whatever it takes
135x5
225x5
275x3
315x1-3
345x1
365x1

Then

385x1
385x1
385x1
385x1

Or
385x2
385x2

Or
385x1
410x1
410x1

In the case of 385 2x2 I'd do the ramp up sets at 315+ at 2 reps each. I like keeping things even.

With all that said I personally wouldn't go that heavy every week. I only work at 90% or more a month or so out from a meet.
 
If I may take a personal stab at this as someone who trains primarily powerlifting. Using 90% is what I do to set my training maxes but that absolutely doesn't mean I work up to 90% every session not even close actually. Working with heavy singles is not actually going to do a lot for your progression as its too taxing even at 90% unless your finishing off an accumulative fatigues progression template they shouldn't be used. The better way to judge your training is with relative preserved exertion and staying in the 8RPE range most of my training sessions work in 7-8RPE with one training session a week working with 9RPE. What does that mean? Well if you can do 365x6 and that's it you can't get another rep to save you life that's a 10RPE so I would only do 365x4 making it a 8RPE. The greatest discipline in strength training is stopping when you can do more, save yourself for another day kind of thing.

As for the thing on dips yes they are applicable for powerlifting but as stated they are accesory and really not one of the more important ones either. For bench yes you need strong triceps but pin presses have better carry over or close grip bench, that being said I do dips 2x a week. The best powerlifting accesories IMO are OHP, powerclean and front squat
 
90% of 1RM or more is generally going to be 3 reps or less of all out effort. Maybe 4 reps at 90% at the very most. You really don't want to be going all out at that high of percentage often though.

According to Prilepin's Chart about 4 reps at 90+ percentage is going to be optimal.

Prilepins-Chart.png


So 2x2 @RPE 9 (~90%) or 4x1 @RPE 8 (~90%) or maybe 2-3x1 @RPE9 (~95%) is going to be about what you're looking for in that range.

As far as ramping up to that I prefer using 3 or less reps all the way up, 5 at most with the lighter weights.

Using the 429 max squat as an example

Bar x whatever it takes
135x5
225x5
275x3
315x1-3
345x1
365x1

Then

385x1
385x1
385x1
385x1

Or
385x2
385x2

Or
385x1
410x1
410x1

In the case of 385 2x2 I'd do the ramp up sets at 315+ at 2 reps each. I like keeping things even.

With all that said I personally wouldn't go that heavy every week. I only work at 90% or more a month or so out from a meet.

Good add on brother. I personally incorporate 90% at the minimum twice every 4 weeks. If not I do heavy reverse band work.

If I may take a personal stab at this as someone who trains primarily powerlifting. Using 90% is what I do to set my training maxes but that absolutely doesn't mean I work up to 90% every session not even close actually. Working with heavy singles is not actually going to do a lot for your progression as its too taxing even at 90% unless your finishing off an accumulative fatigues progression template they shouldn't be used. The better way to judge your training is with relative preserved exertion and staying in the 8RPE range most of my training sessions work in 7-8RPE with one training session a week working with 9RPE. What does that mean? Well if you can do 365x6 and that's it you can't get another rep to save you life that's a 10RPE so I would only do 365x4 making it a 8RPE. The greatest discipline in strength training is stopping when you can do more, save yourself for another day kind of thing.

As for the thing on dips yes they are applicable for powerlifting but as stated they are accesory and really not one of the more important ones either. For bench yes you need strong triceps but pin presses have better carry over or close grip bench, that being said I do dips 2x a week. The best powerlifting accesories IMO are OHP, powerclean and front squat

This is awesome. OHP's are an awesome accessory and have great carry as do front squats. I'll work in the 90% range once or twice a MESO cycle. If it's only one by the third week of my MESO cycle I'm doing reverse band work. Good post brother.
 
Good add on brother. I personally incorporate 90% at the minimum twice every 4 weeks. If not I do heavy reverse band work.



This is awesome. OHP's are an awesome accessory and have great carry as do front squats. I'll work in the 90% range once or twice a MESO cycle. If it's only one by the third week of my MESO cycle I'm doing reverse band work. Good post brother.

I agree, overload work is a good way to get some heavy work in without taxing yourself as much. Squat with wraps, block pulls, slingshot bench or reverse band of any of the three.

I'm three months out from my next meet and my coach has me doing three singles on block pulls this weekend, RPE 9 until RPE 10. Going heavy much earlier than I'm used to in terms of meet preparation.

When I'm doing my own programming I'll incorporate AMRAPS every week or two for the main lifts. I'll do my volume sets and then rep out the last one to really get some work in and also gauge progress without using max weight. It worked pretty well for my last meet prep.
 
I agree, overload work is a good way to get some heavy work in without taxing yourself as much. Squat with wraps, block pulls, slingshot bench or reverse band of any of the three.

I'm three months out from my next meet and my coach has me doing three singles on block pulls this weekend, RPE 9 until RPE 10. Going heavy much earlier than I'm used to in terms of meet preparation.

When I'm doing my own programming I'll incorporate AMRAPS every week or two for the main lifts. I'll do my volume sets and then rep out the last one to really get some work in and also gauge progress without using max weight. It worked pretty well for my last meet prep.
This when gained the most strength. I'd do a top set of 80% of my max bench with a slingshot and AMRAP. I built a lot of strength that weight. Reverse band squats and knee wraps to AMRAP a weight that I could only get 3-4 and end getting 10-12. Good way to overload with out taxing the CNS to much. I want to complete in my first powerlifting meet next year. But I don't have a gym that I know of with powerlifters. So I train by myself.
 
This when gained the most strength. I'd do a top set of 80% of my max bench with a slingshot and AMRAP. I built a lot of strength that weight. Reverse band squats and knee wraps to AMRAP a weight that I could only get 3-4 and end getting 10-12. Good way to overload with out taxing the CNS to much. I want to complete in my first powerlifting meet next year. But I don't have a gym that I know of with powerlifters. So I train by myself.

You can do fine on your own. I live in a rural area and I go to the only gym in town and it's mostly old people that don't even really lift. Just have to make it work. I've trained alone most of the time I've been training.

I've never tried an overloaded AMRAP. I'll have to give that a shot sometime when I'm doing my own programming.
 
Yeah try bro. You'll be amazed. Not taxing at all. I'll throw on the slingshot for bench and my last go all out. But not till failure. Goal is to get 8-10 reps when I finish say a 5x5.
 
So Perrin, you are telling us you train at a gym in a senior citizen's home? That would be interesting. Do they give you sponge baths afterwards? Do you hang out and watch jeopardy?
 
So Perrin, you are telling us you train at a gym in a senior citizen's home? That would be interesting. Do they give you sponge baths afterwards? Do you hang out and watch jeopardy?

Pretty much. They might as well serve apple sauce and have naptime. If it wasn't for the teens it pretty much would be a retirement home gym. It's like 90% extremes one way or the other on the age spectrum.

Seriously it's either some high school kids ego benching 185 with a massive assist from their spotter or large groups of old men hanging around talking about retirement doing maybe one set every ten minutes.

On the bright side both of these groups seem allergic to squats and deadlift, so they don't really get in my way. It's really not a bad gym though since they have a power rack and platform and they allow chalk. That it's the one and only gym in my town doesn't hurt either.
 
Funny how that works. The deadlift platform barely saw any use in my last gym either. They had a nice welded up piece of loading equipment that allowed you to put the bar up in the air a few inches so you could load weights on the bar before you got it on the ground again and got ready to lift. I must have spent hours laughing at guys trying to figure out what it was for and how to use it.

The squat rack was a close second in dust collection except for the occasional teenager curling in the squat rack. Common reasons for not squatting : bad back, bad knees, and yes i heard this one a few times - i don't want my legs to get too big.
 
Funny how that works. The deadlift platform barely saw any use in my last gym either. They had a nice welded up piece of loading equipment that allowed you to put the bar up in the air a few inches so you could load weights on the bar before you got it on the ground again and got ready to lift. I must have spent hours laughing at guys trying to figure out what it was for and how to use it.

The squat rack was a close second in dust collection except for the occasional teenager curling in the squat rack. Common reasons for not squatting : bad back, bad knees, and yes i heard this one a few times - i don't want my legs to get too big.

Haha. I don't want my legs to get to big. Just excuses for not wanting to squat.
 
My old gym had a deadlift jack. I miss that piece of equipment dearly. A guy at my new gym brought his own and left it there for everyone to use and the manager freaked out and none of the trainers even knew what it was for or how to use it. They just complained that it took up too much space and made him take it home. The ironic thing about taking up space at my gym is there's three calf raise machines and two Smith machine, but a deadlift jack was the waste of space.

Luckily there's no mirror near the squat rack at my gym and everyone knows curls must be done in front of a mirror.
 
Back
Top