cloze24
New Member
is this the same lab that bruce jenner is runnin?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hahahahaha that was funnyif his E2 was actually that high, he'd have a sweet rack,
You probably saved your money, it looks like Superior might be heading downhill, unless he goes private and starts focusing on quality over quantity. Its a bummer when a lab gets too big and starts compromising their product for the sake of profit.
EDIT: There are better domestic UGLs IMO, I'd stay away from most of the SF sponsors though...
Are you saying you think the UGL is putting estrogen in his stuff? Gtfo... lol
None of these would raise E2 to a level of 1,200. I don't even think I have seen a false-positive from Tren bloods that had levels this high. Has anyone else?
Reviews? No. HPLC? Yes. Look at Dr Jims HPLC thread in the Lab Testing forum. Superior's Test E came back as "traces of tren..." HOWEVER, my friend has been blastin n cruisin with Superior's Test E, and he swears by it. Once again, no bloods to back it up, so its all hearsay...Also I have yet to see a bad review here on superior unless my search button doesn't work. You never got the chance to try his stuff and everywhere else the only complaint was it being under dosed. Can you point me in the direction of some new reviews that weren't good?
I gotcha, I saw that but I thought it was the tren that was the issue showing trace amounts or something like that. I think at this point with all the confusion I'm going to try and go the Rx route. I have insurance and have been diagnosed with hypogonadism albeit from a low t clinic. I Just need to find someone who will prescribe it for me rather than visiting a clinic every week.Reviews? No. HPLC? Yes. Look at Dr Jims HPLC thread in the Lab Testing forum. Superior's Test E came back as "traces of tren..." HOWEVER, my friend has been blastin n cruisin with Superior's Test E, and he swears by it. Once again, no bloods to back it up, so its all hearsay...
I guess they tested the product thinking it was tren because that was all they found in it? But I have an issue with this. For HPLC testing to be done correctly, there needs to be "stock solution" (pharma grade) to reference the calibration curve. If Test E was tested, but Tren was used as the "stock solution" for reference, wouldn't that negate all Testosterone Enanthate from the results? Correct me if I'm wrong, I am uneducated in these things.FIRST) item any HPLC MUST include a calibration curve of the reference or "stock solution". This is very important bc this curve ensures as the substance becomes more concentrated as in mg/ml the HPLC PEAKS increase in size and/or width. And measuring the peaks surface area DETERMINES an AAS concentration.
...
THIRD) Because "stock solutions" are the benchmark for which samples will be judged against, their PURITY must be as close to 99% as possible. Consequently defining how the stock solutions were derived is a perfectly legit question.
Are you saying you think the UGL is putting estrogen in his stuff? Gtfo... lol
Is this the same guy on safe mail am about to roll the dice I know I am new and getting a solid lead is hard I feel like I read a lot of good info but even when it's something I would try have no idea how to get to them off the name alone but just wondered if that was same ugl talked about in thread
I guess they tested the product thinking it was tren because that was all they found in it? But I have an issue with this. For HPLC testing to be done correctly, there needs to be "stock solution" (pharma grade) to reference the calibration curve. If Test E was tested, but Tren was used as the "stock solution" for reference, wouldn't that negate all Testosterone Enanthate from the results? Correct me if I'm wrong, I am uneducated in these things.
