mp46
New Member
It takes a while. People get trained by him... they run low on gear. Mac just so happens to know a guy. He does this a couple hundred times... some people run bloods. The numbers are great. Word gets out- then the first people with bad bloods report and people like iceman and you pile on them- they are lying, pin timing, everyone reacts different, etc. Then it really starts to pile up, all the handles mac has go dark and you and your fuckboy crew demanding proof also stay away in shame- really the best part of the whole scenario. Nothing about this situation is unique. You want to fight for the hooker with a heart of gold scenario? Have at it.
So My source (TGI) goes under and Mac who currently uses TGI reccomends someone other than TGI because he had them in his back pocket? It only works if both people are using seperare sources such as - I’m using prime and Mac is using alpha. Prime dries up and Mac reccomends alpha. But currently as far as the board knows Mac uses TGI which is a constantly tested source though actual product testing and blood work. So someone recommending TGI isn’t abnormal today. If someone is on TGI reccomends alpha that should throw some flags.
However, any of these scenarios are possible, although lacking plausibility right now. But what flags have been thrown that give the idea this is currently happening or imminent? You’re correct that a source can flip and run at any point but what’s the actual accusation, that TGI is gearing up for an exit scam? That Mac started giving out free knoweledge and coaching to gear up for an “I’ve got a buddy scam?” Seriously what are the actual accusations plainly spelled out?
And therein lies the problem. You become "very protective" of a drug dealer because you think he's worth protecting. He isn't. He's just the current flavor and the odds overwhelmingly suggest that he'll be gone in less than a year.
Join date means nothing when it comes to contributing knowledge. It means a lot when it comes to the perspective it gives re sources. If you knew how many sources have come through here that were exactly like this one, and then turned scammer, you'd understand why the so-called old guard is raining on the parade.
A source is only good until he isn't, and they have short life expectancies. Almost all will end their reign by walking off with your money. A few get busted. And very, very rarely, they retire and go out on good terms but those cases are so rare they're not even worth considering.
The point is, sources aren't worth defending. When they do turn scammer, you having protected them will destroy whatever reputation you've built. The source knows this, of course, but they don't care about your reputation after the fact; the only care about your reputation when you can drive business their way. Don't let them use you.
I don’t think anyone “defending this source” thinks they’re infallible or go to go tomorrow. But the evidence currently supports that he’s been gtg with every PREVIOUS transaction so far with a reasonable expectation the next one should pan out.
Patience you dumb cunt. Its not a story. Its history. The story is going to have an ending you and your source arent going to like.
You are aware the ease in which any dim wit with a computer can order what he needs to open up and start selling.
You fucking people seem to think this was done with the sources in mind in order to expedite his being able to open up and start making money? Wrong.
Or maybe you think its this way in order to give members morw choices with there being more labs with nothing required of them and no cost to do business at a place with a great many people wanting to give up their money.
No...the ease of setting up and. Opening shop and starting the collecting of cash is a loophole...or its greedy men exploiting the system set up for an entirely different reason.
Source boards encourage corruption. Sources pay rent.and fees. If a source gets a bad rep for.underdosed or dirty gear customers go elsewhere. Rent isnt paid.
Board owners want successfui sources. Some board owners also own ugl-s that sell on the board they own.
Where there is money up for grabs there will be greedy people out to get it. Sources at meso dont have any agreement wiith millard. Its not becsuse Millard is pro source.
There are no rules the source is made tp follow.
I will try to make this next point clear before i break for lunch and a meeting with a few people.
Sources and how they are trested ...nicely...fairly...like shit...is the last concern that meso has to be concerned with. Fuck your source and the gravy train some enjoy. I dont trust the way things smell and look around here. Thats all that matters. Thats all i and we as meso members need.
Money breeds corruption. I'll pick up after lunch. You're dismissed.
So what red flags of history are showing up with this source? I’ve asked you multiple times what the actual accusation against TGI or any specific member is and you can’t seem to answer. Do you have an actual accusation or even a theory you can plainly type out without a page long run-on paragraph? It shouldn’t be hard and should look something like this:
“ I believe TGI is doing xxxx based on this information and I’ll be digging for more information and proof”
“I believe xxxx, xxxx, xxxx, and xxxx are employees and/or paid shills for this lab as evidenced here.... I’ll be working to expose them completely as time goes.”
The fact is you haven’t provided a coherent accusation with even a theory surrounding it let alone facts or evidence. It’s great that you notice some history of past sources and recurring themes in this source, so how about you put those into intelligible thoughts instead of schizophrenic ramblings.
