Titanium Gear Industries (domestic source)

Exactly why testing raws ahead of making the batches pays off for you as well as us. If that was done, the WTF goes back to the supplier before you make 500 vials of NandroBoldo Cyp
There still could have been some human error on Pristines part too though. Same thing happened with TGI, but the difference is TGI is the one that caught it, owned it, and moved on. It very well could have been the supplier, but all I'm saying is mistakes happen

Nandrolone Bold Cyp would be pretty cool btw
 
There still could have been some human error on Pristines part too though. Same thing happened with TGI, but the difference is TGI is the one that caught it, owned it, and moved on. It very well could have been the supplier, but all I'm saying is mistakes happen

Nandrolone Bold Cyp would be pretty cool btw
No. Just no.
 
It’s so much easier to blame @janoshik than a source, but let’s face it - this was a blind sample sent in and there’s no way Jano said “What can I pull out of my ass today? Hmm, let’s call this one Bold Cyp and throw in 48% Deca, just because I feel like messing with people today.” I don’t buy it. This was either bad raws or a source being dishonest. With the amount of Deca in there, it was no mistake of not purging the tubes. Though I have a strong feeling that will be the excuse, if he doesn’t blame the raws first.

I think his issue is with the raws. The 2 compounds added together come close to the 200 mg/ml dose. Unless he did the math and deliberately substituted in Deca to save money but why not substitute Test Cyp in, it’s cheaper and same ester.

Edit: But who knows. That’s really the point. This is why testing needs to be done and UGLs held accountable based on it.
 
It’s so much easier to blame @janoshik than a source, but let’s face it - this was a blind sample sent in and there’s no way Jano said “What can I pull out of my ass today? Hmm, let’s call this one Bold Cyp and throw in 48% Deca, just because I feel like messing with people today.” I don’t buy it. This was either bad raws or a source being dishonest. With the amount of Deca in there, it was no mistake of not purging the tubes. Though I have a strong feeling that will be the excuse, if he doesn’t blame the raws first.
I agree. I just saw this post right after I said something similar to 3BG
 
I think his issue is with the raws. The 2 compounds added together come close to the 200 mg/ml dose. Unless he did the math and deliberately substituted in Deca to save money but why not substitute Test Cyp in, it’s cheaper and same ester.

Edit: But who knows. That’s really the point. This is why testing needs to be done and UGLs held accountable based on it.
I don’t see how it can be with the raws.
 
Can someone lmk some history on jano and their testing. Cause pristines Bold Cyp came back w some deca in it and everyone is bashing jano instead of question pristine that much. Just tryna get in the loop ya know
It’s best if you just read up on everything and make your own assumption.
I just wanted to add to this...
If an analysis lab (in this case @janoshik ) tests two separate sources and is questioned about a bad test from one source then why is another source praised for good test result? The same lab analyzed compounds from each source!
Either you accept the reports as accredited or you don’t. Don’t straddle the fence and pick and choose. It’s a bad look and it helps no one! IMO of course.

(Speaking in general, not to anyone specific, just because I like doing so) :)
 
I just wanted to add to this...
If an analysis lab (in this case @janoshik ) tests two separate sources and is questioned about a bad test from one source then why is another source praised for good test result? The same lab analyzed compounds from each source!
Either you accept the reports as accredited or you don’t. Don’t straddle the fence and pick and choose. It’s a bad look and it helps no one! IMO of course.

(Speaking in general, not to anyone specific, just because I like doing so) :)
Yup, you can’t pick and choose and then make Jano the scapegoat.
 
I just wanted to add to this...
If an analysis lab (in this case @janoshik ) tests two separate sources and is questioned about a bad test from one source then why is another source praised for good test result? The same lab analyzed compounds from each source!
Either you accept the reports as accredited or you don’t. Don’t straddle the fence and pick and choose. It’s a bad look and it helps no one! IMO of course.

(Speaking in general, not to anyone specific, just because I like doing so) :)
And this is exactly why we need Trump’s wall.
Buncha fence straddling heathens
 
Yup, you can’t pick and choose and then make Jano the scapegoat.
I am not siding with or backing Jano, but outside of that big ordeal with Mands, which was a very serious thing dont get me wrong, Jano has had a FUCK TON of blind samples thrown at him with results posted and has been on point. I highly doubt that any of this can be put on Jano
 
I am not siding with or backing Jano, but outside of that big ordeal with Mands, which was a very serious thing dont get me wrong, Jano has had a FUCK TON of blind samples thrown at him with results posted and has been on point. I highly doubt that any of this can be put on Jano
Well.... he DID just get banned from BOP for screwing up some tests.
 
Back
Top