I'm very familiar with ester weights. I don't think you're familiar with the half life of non-esterified forms of compounds, or basic math. The difference in ester weight barely matters when the elimination half life is a few hours. If you do the actual math on how much tren is in your system after 4 hours with Tren no ester vs tren acetate, you'll see why the difference in ester weight doesn't matter when the compound is being eliminated faster than you're replenishing it (unless you're jabbing it like 4-5+ times a day, and even then I would still say acetate is better)Seems to me you don't understand the concept of ester weight vs compound - which is fine a lot of people don't .. Keep in mind Suspension is Baisically a 100 % bioavailable Tren , whereas with Ace - after ester cleaving you are left with 87 % Tren - 100 mg vs 87 mg ( assuming the tren is 100 mg / ml for both forms) - Same reasoning people say ace is more " potent " than E - well thats coz Ace is 87 % vs Enth's 70 % After cleaving .. So mg for mg , Suspension will yield more compound hence more gains .... Hope this makes sense ..
People don't run tren no ester because it's better than acetate for building muscle (because it's absolutely not). They run it for its pre workout and central nervous system benefits. Stop preaching garbage advice
Last edited: