Triple B Solutions

I think you mean yes. It's been brewed from untested raws and is currently being sold. I don't care if it's tested later, that is untested. You can talk in circles all you want. Just because you say something doesn't make it true.
"No" was in reference to "So every batch of #103 isn't being tested and sold"

Once again, it is getting tested.
 
I think you mean yes. It's been brewed from untested raws and is currently being sold. I don't care if it's tested later, that is untested. You can talk in circles all you want. Just because you say something doesn't make it true.
Hence why I asked the question above. Lol.
 
Who ties your shoes for you? It is being sold currently . It hasn't been tested yet. Therefore every product of batch#103 isn't being tested and sold.
Logan, I plan to have testing done on most of my product line before it is switched over to batch #103. Batch #102 had several compounds that were untested. So no not "every batch" is being sold untested.
 
Bottom line is this just circles back to fucking the beginning, no one on meso should be brewing and pushing shit without raw testing. Actual professional labs would never send out untested shit and just "overdose it" just incase purity is low. Like I said, people praising him for slowly inching towards the base requirements of Meso. Welcome to the clown show.
 
Probably waiting for daddy

Goddammit quit playing dumb here. Its being sold here WHITHOUT being tested.
I never ONCE said that I am completely out of raws during this conversation. It is amazing how far some of you will go to call me a liar yet it is perfectly acceptable to spread false information regarding things that I have or have not said.
 
So if he is using the same raws from the same bag/pouch that came back good on his test for his new batch of oils, he would need to retest again even if it is the same bag of raws? I'm not talking about same batch as in oils, orals, etc. I'm talking about the actual powder/crystal before it gets made.
 
So I am kinda new to all this stuff when it comes to testing and raws and everything else. I'm learning and its a good thing.

But I do have a question. Let's say he has for example 500 g of raw test enanthate. don't know exactly how hard it is to brew up all of that at one time. Let's say he brews 250 g of that and had that tested and it comes out good.
Would be have to do another test on the other 250 grams when he makes the next batch as well?
Or wouldn't it be the same as the first batch, PROVIDING he does the same math calculations?

Traditionally, a “batch” is what is made at the same time, same run, same ingredients, same conditions, same temperature, etc. so all 500 grams should be brewed at once.

A simple brain fart when weighing the raws could fuck it up. Adding a little too much BB would dilute it. Measuring out a little too much oil dilutes it. Forgetting to clean the kitchen counter and KitchenAid stove before brewing could introduce fuzz in the 2nd half of “Batch 103”.

Its pointless to put batch numbers on vials that are made at different times. The product samples should be resubmitted but obviously the raws sample is still valid.

If he wants to fuck around with that (which douchehead no doubt will do) he’ll get bit by it when there’s a problem with one of his brews and he has to recall ALL of “batch 103”.
 
Traditionally, a “batch” is what is made at the same time, same run, same ingredients, same conditions, same temperature, etc. so all 500 grams should be brewed at once.

A simple brain fart when weighing the raws could fuck it up. Adding a little too much BB would dilute it. Measuring out a little too much oil dilutes it. Forgetting to clean the kitchen counter and KitchenAid stove before brewing could introduce fuzz in the 2nd half of “Batch 103”.

Its pointless to put batch numbers on vials that are made at different times. The product samples should be resubmitted but obviously the raws sample is still valid.

If he wants to fuck around with that (which douchehead no doubt will do) he’ll get bit by it when there’s a problem with one of his brews and he has to recall ALL of “batch 103”.
Thanks bro. I understand better now.
 
I never ONCE said that I am completely out of raws during this conversation. It is amazing how far some of you will go to call me a liar yet it is perfectly acceptable to spread false information regarding things that I have or have not said.
Your selling untested finished products. What part of this don't you understand?

You should have and be testing ALL OF YOUR FINISHED PRODUCTS AND RAWS BEFORE OFFERING THEM FOR SALE ON MESO.

Sorry I had to scream at you but you are acting like a child.
 
This thread is always a ride.

It sounds like you intend to brew these compounds for this batch(103) and send raws and finished all at once? I mean, there’s a few lines I’ve read between to think that, but is that correct?
 
Triple b, just take the new primo(batch #103) off the list and discount the underdosed DHB/Viagra of batch #102 until you get your new batch #103 all brewed and tested. People will just have to do without the primo on the list for now.
I think this will solve some of the issues.
 
Batch #103 will be completely tested. We can spend a couple more hours arguing semantics. What I said stands true. The entire batch will get testing.

Just to clear it up fir any newbs that just read your bold print.

Batch #103 will be completely tested. We can spend a couple more hours arguing semantics. What I said stands true. The entire batch will get testing. Some stuff is currently being sold as UNtested but will be tested. Eventually.

[emoji115] that way it’s not so misleading
 
Triple b, just take the new primo(batch #103) off the list and discount the underdosed DHB/Viagra of batch #102 until you get your new batch #103 all brewed and tested. People will just have to do without the primo on the list for now.
I think this will solve some of the issues.
With that logic I would have to take down half of my product list. #103 will be a baseline with all of my products tested.
 
Top