Trump Timeline ... Trumpocalypse





What immediately jumps out are the dark gray bars representing Trump’s “executive time,” unstructured time in which the president can call friends and advisers, hold impromptu meetings or watch news programming. This was Axios’s focus in its report, noting that about 60 percent of the time from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. on the scheduled days is executive time.

There’s a sort of default assumption among Trump’s critics that the president spends most of this time in a semi-stupor, watching Fox and tapping away at Twitter, but that’s probably not the case for much of the time. You’ll notice that, after his initial “executive time” period on most days, there are fewer tweets overlapping with those periods during his day.

Instead, the time seems to serve largely as the sort of freewheeling time to which Trump grew accustomed as the CEO of the Trump Organization. He and his team tend to mush together all of his unstructured time — including obviously nonproductive time watching cable news shows — as being work periods. It’s similar, in some ways, to how the administration will only rarely admit that the president is playing golf. At one point, former press secretary Sean Spicer suggested that Trump was making calls and holding meetings at his golf clubs, not necessarily hitting the links. By incorporating unscheduled call and meeting time in any way with Trump’s preferred leisure activities, those activities get blurred into an argument that the president constantly has his nose to the grindstone.

Looking more closely, though, you’ll notice that there are nearly as many tweets sent during scheduled time as during executive time. Many of these come at the end of those scheduled periods, but some don’t. Some, as on Dec. 7, coming during flights on Air Force One.

The impression we get from Trump’s leaked schedules, really, is that Trump’s day doesn’t really start until 11 a.m. Before that, he seems to be engaged in the sort of “executive time” that his critics disparage: Lots of watching television and tweeting about things that are on his mind. After that initial block, though, his executive time bears fewer of those hallmarks, looking more like the sort of unstructured-but-productive time his advocates suggest make up much of his day.

In a statement to Axios, Sanders responded to its story about Trump’s schedule.

“President Trump has a different leadership style than his predecessors and the results speak for themselves,” she said, in a statement that Trump’s detractors might also offer verbatim.
 


Senate Democrats introduced legislation on Monday to prevent President Trump from using military and disaster relief funds to construct the U.S.-Mexico border wall should he declare a national emergency.

The https://www.tomudall.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/RAIDER%20Act%202019.pdf (legislation) would prevent Trump from using funding from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works funds and military construction funding "for the construction of barriers, land acquisition, or any other associated activities on the southern border without specific statutory authorization from Congress" if he declared a national emergency.

Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) said that while an emergency declaration to construct the U.S.-Mexico border wall would be challenged in court "Congress should not wait for the courts to act."

"We must stand up and assert our role as a co-equal branch of government, and we must prevent the president from going around Congress to raid critical funds … for a politically-motivated, unjustified national emergency declaration that isn’t based in reality," he said.

Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) added that the bill would "prevent funds designated for critical military construction and disaster response" from being used to build the wall in the event Trump declares a national emergency.
 


Senate Democrats introduced legislation on Monday to prevent President Trump from using military and disaster relief funds to construct the U.S.-Mexico border wall should he declare a national emergency.

The https://www.tomudall.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/RAIDER%20Act%202019.pdf (legislation) would prevent Trump from using funding from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers civil works funds and military construction funding "for the construction of barriers, land acquisition, or any other associated activities on the southern border without specific statutory authorization from Congress" if he declared a national emergency.

Sen. Tom Udall (D-N.M.) said that while an emergency declaration to construct the U.S.-Mexico border wall would be challenged in court "Congress should not wait for the courts to act."

"We must stand up and assert our role as a co-equal branch of government, and we must prevent the president from going around Congress to raid critical funds … for a politically-motivated, unjustified national emergency declaration that isn’t based in reality," he said.

Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) added that the bill would "prevent funds designated for critical military construction and disaster response" from being used to build the wall in the event Trump declares a national emergency.


This bill will obviously pass the house, with likely strong bipartisanship support.
Secondary benefit: This will force the senate republicans to either side with congress and restrict presidential powers, or hand more power to Trump at their own expense. Grab the popcorn and watch McConnell squirm.
 


Federal prosecutors in New York on Monday delivered a sweeping request for documents related to donations and spending by President Trump’s inaugural committee, a sign of a deepening criminal investigation into activities related to the nonprofit organization.

A wide-ranging subpoena served on the inaugural committee Monday seeks an array of documents, including all information related to inaugural donors, vendors, contractors, bank accounts of the inaugural committee and any information related to foreign contributors to the committee, according to a copy reviewed by The Washington Post.

Only U.S. citizens and legal residents can legally donate to a committee established to finance presidential inaugural festivities.
 
Last edited:


The challenges facing American democracy did not begin with President Trump. But midway through his term, there remains little doubt that his influence is straining core U.S. values, testing the constitutional system’s stability , and undermining democracies and the cause of freedom beyond the nation’s borders.

Through our annual Freedom in the World report, Freedom House has been measuring political rights and civil liberties in every country for nearly 50 years. While our assessments of countries overseas typically command the most attention, we always look inward at the United States as well. As indicated by our latest report, which is being released Tuesday, we have never been more concerned about the health of American democracy.

By global standards, democracy in the United States remains robust, but it has weakened significantly in the past decade, according to our research. Intensifying political polarization, declining economic mobility, the outsize influence of special interests and the diminished influence of fact-based news reporting in favor of bellicose partisan media were all problems afflicting American democracy well before 2017. But Trump’s frequent attacks on essential norms and institutions — such as an independent judiciary, separation of powers, a free press and the legitimacy of elections — threaten to accelerate the decline by wearing down democratic checks and balances.

...

Dyo9Q8qUcAAwwDO.jpg
 


The challenges facing American democracy did not begin with President Trump. But midway through his term, there remains little doubt that his influence is straining core U.S. values, testing the constitutional system’s stability , and undermining democracies and the cause of freedom beyond the nation’s borders.

Through our annual Freedom in the World report, Freedom House has been measuring political rights and civil liberties in every country for nearly 50 years. While our assessments of countries overseas typically command the most attention, we always look inward at the United States as well. As indicated by our latest report, which is being released Tuesday, we have never been more concerned about the health of American democracy.

By global standards, democracy in the United States remains robust, but it has weakened significantly in the past decade, according to our research. Intensifying political polarization, declining economic mobility, the outsize influence of special interests and the diminished influence of fact-based news reporting in favor of bellicose partisan media were all problems afflicting American democracy well before 2017. But Trump’s frequent attacks on essential norms and institutions — such as an independent judiciary, separation of powers, a free press and the legitimacy of elections — threaten to accelerate the decline by wearing down democratic checks and balances.

...

View attachment 105485




Democratic freedoms are under attack in the United States because of the actions of President Trump, threatening to hasten the retreat of democracy around the world, according to a report released Monday by Freedom House.

In a signed essay within the report, Freedom House President Michael Abramowitz accused Trump of undermining the pillars of freedom, including separation of powers, a free press, an independent and impartial judiciary, and the legitimacy of elections.

Abramowitz acknowledged that American freedoms have been eroded under previous administrations.

“At the midpoint of his term, however, there remains little question that President Trump exerts an influence on American politics that is straining our core values and testing the stability of our constitutional system,” he wrote. “No president in living memory has shown less respect for its tenets, norms and principles.”
 
Back
Top