View: https://twitter.com/ConorPWilliams/status/1351879543880114176?s=20
On Monday, the Trump administration released the first, and only, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The-Presidents-Advisory-1776-Commission-Final-Report.pdf from the President's Advisory 1776 Commission. Its authors insist that the 45-page document is an effort to set the historical record straight. "In order to build up a healthy, united citizenry," they write, "scholars, students, and all Americans must reject false and fashionable ideologies that obscure facts, ignore historical context, and tell America's story solely as one of oppression and victimhood rather than one of imperfection but also unprecedented achievement toward freedom, happiness, and fairness for all."
Oddly enough, for a report that claims to offer the clear facts of American history, no scholars of American history are among its authors. To be sure, academics and experts from other fields and Americans from all walks of life can weigh in on the shared history of their nation. But the complete lack of involvement from those who were trained in the field and who teach it today means
the 1776 report winds up doing exactly what it claims others do: obscuring facts and ignoring historical context.
Since its release, historians have https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2021/01/19/1776-report-historians-trump/ (denounced the report in no uncertain terms),
drawing attention to its
shoddy scholarship while
decrying its
clumsy partisan intent. The "1776" project as a whole was a thinly veiled response to The New York Times Magazine's "
1619 Project" — for which I wrote an essay on the impact of racism on urban planning.