In most western countries I know of it is the rich fucking people over, not the poor. maybe different where you are...
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Trump vs McCain
- Thread starter Big_paul
- Start date
My friend that is definitely not the case here.
WaPo/ABC Poll
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...d2e0d0-2ef8-11e5-8f36-18d1d501920d_story.html
Businessman Donald Trump surged into the lead for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, with almost twice the support of his closest rival, just as he ignited a new controversy after making disparaging remarks about Sen. John McCain’s Vietnam War service, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
...
Even with the drop in support on the final night of the survey, Trump was the favorite of 24 percent of registered Republicans and Republican-leaning independents. That is the highest percentage and biggest lead recorded by any GOP candidate this year in Post-ABC News polls and marks a sixfold increase in his support since late May, shortly before he formally joined the race.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who announced his candidacy a week ago, is in second place, at 13 percent, followed by former Florida governor Jeb Bush, at 12 percent. Walker’s support is strongest among those who describe themselves as “very conservative.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...d2e0d0-2ef8-11e5-8f36-18d1d501920d_story.html
Businessman Donald Trump surged into the lead for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, with almost twice the support of his closest rival, just as he ignited a new controversy after making disparaging remarks about Sen. John McCain’s Vietnam War service, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.
...
Even with the drop in support on the final night of the survey, Trump was the favorite of 24 percent of registered Republicans and Republican-leaning independents. That is the highest percentage and biggest lead recorded by any GOP candidate this year in Post-ABC News polls and marks a sixfold increase in his support since late May, shortly before he formally joined the race.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, who announced his candidacy a week ago, is in second place, at 13 percent, followed by former Florida governor Jeb Bush, at 12 percent. Walker’s support is strongest among those who describe themselves as “very conservative.”
S
Sorry element, I miss read your post. The poor are the ones getting screwed.
"How many times does a guy need to get hit over the head, before he figures out who is hitting him over the head".Harry Truman
All of America has been sold out except for guys like Blankfien, ceo Goldman Sachs, and Paulson, a headge fund that went to goldman and asked for losers to bet against, while goldman represented them as great investments. Fucking jew boy.
They should be drawn and quartered.
They should be drawn and quartered.
Mr. Deltoid
New Member
Trump all day long! Mcain is a war hero no doubt but hes also a big government republican progressive. Trump has actually built a multi billion dollar empire he speaks the truth he doesn't hide behind sissy ass politically correct bullshit and the most important thing is he will bring out our base there's more of us than there is off them the reason we lose is because we nominate people who keep the base home! The democrats run to the left hard every election and tell us through their lap dogs in the media better not run a conservative better run a middle of the road canadite and the progressive republicans listen and we lose. We need Scott Walker , Donald Trump, Ted Cruze , Ron or Rand Paul.
Mr. Deltoid
New Member
We shouldn't vote for anyone whose made their whole life in government and who hastnt run a giant business a state. We need vision and someone who knows how to make desisions hard ones and take full responsibility for their whole team not run from it.
Mr. Deltoid
New Member
Christy , Bush , McCain , Rubio , all no fucking way!
hahaha
Mr. Deltoid
New Member
Obama's policies have hurt the poorest of us that's for sure their just to uniformed and uneducated (by design) realize it. Not to mention the propaganda on the TV every major news station is fos Im even diapointed with fox.
My thoughts exactly!
Come to America and you'll see it's very different!!
When you take stray animal out of the wild and put it in a pen and start feeding it, eventually it quits looking for food. That's pretty much how I look at the welfare system in the United states. Hell, it's practically encouraged to be on government assistance here, everywhere you go now there is a fucking sign that says "WE TAKE EBT!!"
Back in the day you had food coupons, now it's like you just swipe your card like a debit card and Wahla, free shit!!! Free everything!! Free daycare, practically free housing, free lunch for the kids at school, you can even get a cell phone for free every month (because you "have to be available" in case someone calls you about a job!!) It's motherfucking bullshit. The rich do not fuck over the poor here, they are the backbone that allows lazy fucks to continue to be lazy
Donald Trump Insult Generator
http://time.com/3966291/donald-trump-insult-generator/
Feeling left out that Trump hasn’t gotten around to insulting you or your friends? Here’s an app for that. Built on the real-live insults taken from the would-be President’s Twitter feed, http://time.com/3966291/donald-trump-insult-generator/www.twitter.com/realdonaldtrump, the generator below provides a Trump insult for everyone.
http://time.com/3966291/donald-trump-insult-generator/
Feeling left out that Trump hasn’t gotten around to insulting you or your friends? Here’s an app for that. Built on the real-live insults taken from the would-be President’s Twitter feed, http://time.com/3966291/donald-trump-insult-generator/www.twitter.com/realdonaldtrump, the generator below provides a Trump insult for everyone.
Mr. Deltoid
New Member
A-men Brother that's exactly right the government progressives on both sides want slaves or subjects not free men and women. The rich are fucking everyone that's laughable nonsense its not 1910 anymore its 2015 there's no big corperate machine enslaving the masses its our government!
Donald Trump's hair piece fleeing to the Mexican border.
That time Donald Trump took down Vince McMahon ringside at WWE.
https://vine.co/v/en3larExZjT
https://vine.co/v/en3larExZjT
U have to admit it's entertaining.
I can understand the frustration. Politicians are looking out for everyone but the people they were elected to serve. That goes for all of them, red or blue.
I can understand the frustration. Politicians are looking out for everyone but the people they were elected to serve. That goes for all of them, red or blue.
Donald Trump's brazen genius
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2015/07/politics-and-deal-making
WHEN Donald Trump began roiling the calm but crowded waters of the Republican presidential race with slanderous comments about Mexican immigrants, it was hard not to wonder what the rentier reality-TV star was up to. When someone runs for president, the safest inference is that he or she wants to be president. Even if it's a longshot, the attention is nice, and something good might come from having raised one's public profile. So if you have the money, why not run? Mr Trump's lust for attention, combined with his fortune, seemed to be all the explanation needed. "Do I look like I have a plan?" says the Joker in "The Dark Knight". "I'm a dog chasing cars. I don't know what I'd do if I caught it". Mr Trump's havoc-spreading run seemed to share this improvisational spirit.
But now that he's leading the Republican field in national polls, it seems that Mr Trump may have already caught the car, and always knew what he'd do with it: sell it for a profit.
When asked if he would pursue a third-party candidacy should he fail to secure the GOP nomination, Mr Trump was coy: "so many people want me to, if I don’t win,” he said. "I’ll have to see how I’m being treated by the Republicans,” Mr Trump explained, with just a hint of blackmail. “If they’re not fair, that would be a factor.”
These are the words of a negotiator looking to cut a deal, and Mr Trump has put himself in a fine position to get one. The latest ABC News/Washington Post poll not only has Mr Trump leading the Republican pack, but also shows that a third-party run by Mr Trump could very well ruin the party’s chances of winning back the White House. The poll has Hillary Clinton, who retains a commanding lead in the Democratic race, with a six-point lead in a hypothetical contest against, Jeb Bush, a former Florida governor and the likeliest GOP-establishment candidate. That gap would probably narrow into margin-of-error territory should the Republican electorate, whose loyalties are now fragmented, eventually coalesce behind Mr Bush. Which is to say, an election would probably be very close, but not if Mr Trump makes a third-party bid.
In a hypothetical three-way race, Mr Trump would steal enough votes from Mr Bush to put Mrs Clinton ahead by 16 points, according to the ABC News/Washington Post poll. The Donald’s conservative vote-siphoning effect would be less dramatic, no doubt, should Republicans settle on a candidate more appealing to the party's most conservative members. (There is method in Ted Cruz's refusal to condemn Mr Trump's madness.) Nevertheless, it appears that Mr Trump could very well hand the election to Mrs Clinton, even if he manages to draw only one or two percent of the voters who would have voted for the Republican candidate in a two-way race. And it’s a prospect he has yet to rule out.
It's tempting for establishment Republicans to write off Mr Trump as a flash in the pan, this election season's Herman Cain. There are signs that Mr Trump is peaking. In three key swing states, voters with a dim view of Mr Trump outnumber those who like him http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/2016-presidential-swing-state-polls/release-detail?ReleaseID=2261. Still, Mr Trump is famous, which ought to be enough to keep him from sliding into oblivion. And he is willing and able to fund his own campaign. That makes the threat of a third-party candidacy something Republicans cannot afford to ignore.
And it’s a threat Mr Trump has made explicit. So what, Republicans may now be wondering, does the man mean when he demands “fair” treatment? A cabinet appointment is out of the question. Is he angling for an ambassadorship to Monaco (or somewhere else suitably glamorous and otherwise diplomatically inessential)? It’s unclear. But what we do know is that Mr Trump is in the real-estate business, an industry rife with red tape, in which a little political leverage can be worth a fortune.
In his bestseller, "Trump: the art of the deal", Mr Trump crows about a property-tax abatement he negotiated with the New York City government in the 1970s that saved him "tens of millions of dollars". Then in 1994 Mr Trump asked the city of Bridgeport, Connecticut, http://articles.courant.com/1994-06-03/news/9406030357_1_trump-connecticut-casinos-in-atlantic-city-trump-s-lawyers already occupied by five businesses, and then sell him the parcels so that he could build a "world class" amusement park and seaport. Noting the difficulty of acquiring the property and the required development permits, Mr Trump said, "That's a political process. And I've probably been in more political fights than anyone my age". In 1996 Mr Trump tried and failed to push an elderly widow out of her house using Atlantic City's eminent domain powers, so that he could build a casino on her land. More recently, Mr Trump tried and failed to block the development of a casino in the Catskills, which he feared would cut into the profits of his New Jersey gambling operations. He had considered appealing to the Department of the Interior to stop the Native American-run Catskills casino, but gave up in the teeth of then-governor Eliot Spitzer's support for the project. "At some point there’s going to be competition," Mr Trump eventually conceded. But he hadn't in the previous ten years, during which time he successfully delayed the development through lobbying and litigation. Given his history of remunerative favour-seeking from government, it's doubtful he would have ever conceded if he thought he could get the federal government to put a stop to it.
You'd have to be astoundingly brazen to run for president, churning up toxic xenophobic sentiments, just to get the political leverage to win a huge tax break, or to build a casino or to stop somebody else's casino. But Mr Trump is neither a meek nor public-spirited man. And, astonishingly enough, he may have actually succeeded in putting the Republican Party in a corner.
If cutting a sweet deal is what Mr Trump was aiming to do all along, we might have to admit that he is more than the attention-seeking buffoon he appears to be. It may be that he is a attention-seeking, buffoonish genius. In any case, Mr Trump has floated the possibility that he may try to wreck the Republican Party's presidential chances unless it coughs up a little "fair" treatment, whatever that means. If the GOP doesn't think it can neutralise Mr Trump's threat of a third-party run by utterly demolishing his reputation, then they're going to have to consider a little fairness. Not a bad month's work for Mr Trump.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2015/07/politics-and-deal-making
WHEN Donald Trump began roiling the calm but crowded waters of the Republican presidential race with slanderous comments about Mexican immigrants, it was hard not to wonder what the rentier reality-TV star was up to. When someone runs for president, the safest inference is that he or she wants to be president. Even if it's a longshot, the attention is nice, and something good might come from having raised one's public profile. So if you have the money, why not run? Mr Trump's lust for attention, combined with his fortune, seemed to be all the explanation needed. "Do I look like I have a plan?" says the Joker in "The Dark Knight". "I'm a dog chasing cars. I don't know what I'd do if I caught it". Mr Trump's havoc-spreading run seemed to share this improvisational spirit.
But now that he's leading the Republican field in national polls, it seems that Mr Trump may have already caught the car, and always knew what he'd do with it: sell it for a profit.
When asked if he would pursue a third-party candidacy should he fail to secure the GOP nomination, Mr Trump was coy: "so many people want me to, if I don’t win,” he said. "I’ll have to see how I’m being treated by the Republicans,” Mr Trump explained, with just a hint of blackmail. “If they’re not fair, that would be a factor.”
These are the words of a negotiator looking to cut a deal, and Mr Trump has put himself in a fine position to get one. The latest ABC News/Washington Post poll not only has Mr Trump leading the Republican pack, but also shows that a third-party run by Mr Trump could very well ruin the party’s chances of winning back the White House. The poll has Hillary Clinton, who retains a commanding lead in the Democratic race, with a six-point lead in a hypothetical contest against, Jeb Bush, a former Florida governor and the likeliest GOP-establishment candidate. That gap would probably narrow into margin-of-error territory should the Republican electorate, whose loyalties are now fragmented, eventually coalesce behind Mr Bush. Which is to say, an election would probably be very close, but not if Mr Trump makes a third-party bid.
In a hypothetical three-way race, Mr Trump would steal enough votes from Mr Bush to put Mrs Clinton ahead by 16 points, according to the ABC News/Washington Post poll. The Donald’s conservative vote-siphoning effect would be less dramatic, no doubt, should Republicans settle on a candidate more appealing to the party's most conservative members. (There is method in Ted Cruz's refusal to condemn Mr Trump's madness.) Nevertheless, it appears that Mr Trump could very well hand the election to Mrs Clinton, even if he manages to draw only one or two percent of the voters who would have voted for the Republican candidate in a two-way race. And it’s a prospect he has yet to rule out.
It's tempting for establishment Republicans to write off Mr Trump as a flash in the pan, this election season's Herman Cain. There are signs that Mr Trump is peaking. In three key swing states, voters with a dim view of Mr Trump outnumber those who like him http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/2016-presidential-swing-state-polls/release-detail?ReleaseID=2261. Still, Mr Trump is famous, which ought to be enough to keep him from sliding into oblivion. And he is willing and able to fund his own campaign. That makes the threat of a third-party candidacy something Republicans cannot afford to ignore.
And it’s a threat Mr Trump has made explicit. So what, Republicans may now be wondering, does the man mean when he demands “fair” treatment? A cabinet appointment is out of the question. Is he angling for an ambassadorship to Monaco (or somewhere else suitably glamorous and otherwise diplomatically inessential)? It’s unclear. But what we do know is that Mr Trump is in the real-estate business, an industry rife with red tape, in which a little political leverage can be worth a fortune.
In his bestseller, "Trump: the art of the deal", Mr Trump crows about a property-tax abatement he negotiated with the New York City government in the 1970s that saved him "tens of millions of dollars". Then in 1994 Mr Trump asked the city of Bridgeport, Connecticut, http://articles.courant.com/1994-06-03/news/9406030357_1_trump-connecticut-casinos-in-atlantic-city-trump-s-lawyers already occupied by five businesses, and then sell him the parcels so that he could build a "world class" amusement park and seaport. Noting the difficulty of acquiring the property and the required development permits, Mr Trump said, "That's a political process. And I've probably been in more political fights than anyone my age". In 1996 Mr Trump tried and failed to push an elderly widow out of her house using Atlantic City's eminent domain powers, so that he could build a casino on her land. More recently, Mr Trump tried and failed to block the development of a casino in the Catskills, which he feared would cut into the profits of his New Jersey gambling operations. He had considered appealing to the Department of the Interior to stop the Native American-run Catskills casino, but gave up in the teeth of then-governor Eliot Spitzer's support for the project. "At some point there’s going to be competition," Mr Trump eventually conceded. But he hadn't in the previous ten years, during which time he successfully delayed the development through lobbying and litigation. Given his history of remunerative favour-seeking from government, it's doubtful he would have ever conceded if he thought he could get the federal government to put a stop to it.
You'd have to be astoundingly brazen to run for president, churning up toxic xenophobic sentiments, just to get the political leverage to win a huge tax break, or to build a casino or to stop somebody else's casino. But Mr Trump is neither a meek nor public-spirited man. And, astonishingly enough, he may have actually succeeded in putting the Republican Party in a corner.
If cutting a sweet deal is what Mr Trump was aiming to do all along, we might have to admit that he is more than the attention-seeking buffoon he appears to be. It may be that he is a attention-seeking, buffoonish genius. In any case, Mr Trump has floated the possibility that he may try to wreck the Republican Party's presidential chances unless it coughs up a little "fair" treatment, whatever that means. If the GOP doesn't think it can neutralise Mr Trump's threat of a third-party run by utterly demolishing his reputation, then they're going to have to consider a little fairness. Not a bad month's work for Mr Trump.
Its all about power for Trump. He wants to be the most powerful man on earth. And the wealthiest.
Similar threads
