How exactly is the standard test erroneous? From what I’ve seen it typically overestimates E2 by a factor of 2 or so, but has it ever underestimated it and just been totally randomly wrong? Honestly if we are aware that it multiplies the “real” E2 by 1.5-2, I think we can still use it in conjunction with any symptoms to figure out whether E2 is crashed, low, or high?
Not only does ultrasensitive cost more, but it seems to take far more time (10d) to come back, whereas standard comes back the next day. 10d is a lot of days of a blast to waste sitting on your hands, but if standard E2 levels are so highly unreliable in either direction, there may not be much of a choice if you want to minimize risk of crashing E2
Not only does ultrasensitive cost more, but it seems to take far more time (10d) to come back, whereas standard comes back the next day. 10d is a lot of days of a blast to waste sitting on your hands, but if standard E2 levels are so highly unreliable in either direction, there may not be much of a choice if you want to minimize risk of crashing E2