Unsolicited Email - AAS

I noticed a lot is posted here, I made this for new guys to catch up.... A BRIEF SUMMARY:

nfZB8bv.jpg
 
Come on man, he's not exploiting them, they ARE having to show ID and sign waivers right before he puts the little David in them?!?! :D:D:D:D

I STILL can't believe that part of this whole thing. Girls down there must be different, cause I can only imagine what most girls here in the states would do if you asked them to officially sign their snatch away before engaging in sexual relations!!! :rolleyes: They'd probably be like "crazy ass fool wanting me to sign a contract? What was he planning on doing to me?".
 
Bickel with all do respect, there's a big differences between a young guy banging a 19 yr old girl. AND a 40 something yr old creeper Exploiting teenage girls, just my view man.

Spot on, IMO. 18 might be the legal limit but it's not the moral limit for a 40-year-old man. If you forget about the legal limit for a minute, imagine a 19-year-old male engaging in sex with a 17-year-old, or even a 16-year-old. It doesn't raise an eyebrow even though it's illegal. But a 40-year-old male would be tarred and feathered. The legal limit isn't important morally because the difference between 17 and 18 is mostly insignificant.

Having raised daughters, I can tell you that 18-year-old girls are still children. They might look like adults physically but mentally they're just kids. And I can also tell you that if some 40-year-old pervert had put a hand on my daughters when they were 18-year-old, they'd be singing soprano today. The 19-year-old would have just gotten his ass kicked. So 18 just means the 40-year-old is not legally a chomo, but he's still a chomo.

I'm throwing this out just for fum, but the unwritten rule that I've always heard is the lowest acceptable limit is half you age plus seven. So 40/2 + 7 = 27-years-old. Anything above is acceptable. Anything under means you're creepy. And Slaton is way under and definitely creepy.
 
Spot on, IMO. 18 might be the legal limit but it's not the moral limit for a 40-year-old man. If you forget about the legal limit for a minute, imagine a 19-year-old male engaging in sex with a 17-year-old, or even a 16-year-old. It doesn't raise an eyebrow even though it's illegal. But a 40-year-old male would be tarred and feathered. The legal limit isn't important morally because the difference between 17 and 18 is mostly insignificant.

Having raised daughters, I can tell you that 18-year-old girls are still children. They might look like adults physically but mentally they're just kids. And I can also tell you that if some 40-year-old pervert had put a hand on my daughters when they were 18-year-old, they'd be singing soprano today. The 19-year-old would have just gotten his ass kicked. So 18 just means the 40-year-old is not legally a chomo, but he's still a chomo.

I'm throwing this out just for fum, but the unwritten rule that I've always heard is the lowest acceptable limit is half you age plus seven. So 40/2 + 7 = 27-years-old. Anything above is acceptable. Anything under means you're creepy. And Slaton is way under and definitely creepy.

Damn am I glad I am married! My wife is from the Southside of Chicago, so the only math ol' Bickel has to factor is I sleep with only 1 girl. If that number increases above 1, then my 2 testicles will be removed from my 1 body after I fall asleep.

Ain't no playing around with them Southside girls.
 
Spot on, IMO. 18 might be the legal limit but it's not the moral limit for a 40-year-old man. If you forget about the legal limit for a minute, imagine a 19-year-old male engaging in sex with a 17-year-old, or even a 16-year-old. It doesn't raise an eyebrow even though it's illegal. But a 40-year-old male would be tarred and feathered. The legal limit isn't important morally because the difference between 17 and 18 is mostly insignificant.

Having raised daughters, I can tell you that 18-year-old girls are still children. They might look like adults physically but mentally they're just kids. And I can also tell you that if some 40-year-old pervert had put a hand on my daughters when they were 18-year-old, they'd be singing soprano today. The 19-year-old would have just gotten his ass kicked. So 18 just means the 40-year-old is not legally a chomo, but he's still a chomo.

I'm throwing this out just for fum, but the unwritten rule that I've always heard is the lowest acceptable limit is half you age plus seven. So 40/2 + 7 = 27-years-old. Anything above is acceptable. Anything under means you're creepy. And Slaton is way under and definitely creepy.

THIS

the legal age of consent in australia is 16 in most states, which is fucking horrific. No one over the age of 30 should be able to sleep with a 16 year old, its just plain wrong.

18 year olds are still teenagers, they are KIDS. There are SOME who are wise and mature beyond their years but not many.






@Big_paul why does it seem like you're backing this dude?? Its an EXTREMELY bad look. This fuck head is actually claiming that his "clients" have him permission to post their personal information. COME THE FUCK ON. As soon as this herb posted the tracking numbers THATS IT. NOBODY should be taking him seriously or standing by him. That was beyond a fuck up on his part. There is no coming back from that. Can you imagine if you had been dealing with someone privately and to prove a point on some internet forum he posted the tracking number to one of your previous orders?! come on.
 
Damn am I glad I am married! My wife is from the Southside of Chicago, so the only math ol' Bickel has to factor is I sleep with only 1 girl. If that number increases above 1, then my 2 testicles will be removed from my 1 body after I fall asleep.

Ain't no playing around with them Southside girls.
See how having these smart guys around helps. You now can do the math to ensure you keep all your bits. It's a win/win
 
IMO, those girls look younger than 18. Do I know that for a fact? No, of course not. But, I sure as fuck don't believe that giant douche David Slaton when HE says they're legal age.
i actually believe him. The fact he is stating he made sure they're legal so he could film them isn't a sign of being a good person at all, it shows that he's a sick fuck who knows NOT to record himself fucking with underage girls.

this guy is beyond a scumbag.
 
i actually believe him. The fact he is stating he made sure they're legal so he could film them isn't a sign of being a good person at all, it shows that he's a sick fuck who knows NOT to record himself fucking with underage girls.

this guy is beyond a scumbag.
This. Its unanimous, the guy is shit
 
i actually believe him. The fact he is stating he made sure they're legal so he could film them isn't a sign of being a good person at all, it shows that he's a sick fuck who knows NOT to record himself fucking with underage girls.

this guy is beyond a scumbag.

Again, thats assuming he's telling the truth. I assume he's lying about most everything.

I agree that hes a scumbag though.
 
Back
Top