Wiltedrose
New Member
I noticed a lot is posted here, I made this for new guys to catch up.... A BRIEF SUMMARY:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I noticed a lot is posted here, I made this for new guys to catch up.... A BRIEF SUMMARY:
Bickel with all do respect, there's a big differences between a young guy banging a 19 yr old girl. AND a 40 something yr old creeper Exploiting teenage girls, just my view man.
Spot on, IMO. 18 might be the legal limit but it's not the moral limit for a 40-year-old man. If you forget about the legal limit for a minute, imagine a 19-year-old male engaging in sex with a 17-year-old, or even a 16-year-old. It doesn't raise an eyebrow even though it's illegal. But a 40-year-old male would be tarred and feathered. The legal limit isn't important morally because the difference between 17 and 18 is mostly insignificant.
Having raised daughters, I can tell you that 18-year-old girls are still children. They might look like adults physically but mentally they're just kids. And I can also tell you that if some 40-year-old pervert had put a hand on my daughters when they were 18-year-old, they'd be singing soprano today. The 19-year-old would have just gotten his ass kicked. So 18 just means the 40-year-old is not legally a chomo, but he's still a chomo.
I'm throwing this out just for fum, but the unwritten rule that I've always heard is the lowest acceptable limit is half you age plus seven. So 40/2 + 7 = 27-years-old. Anything above is acceptable. Anything under means you're creepy. And Slaton is way under and definitely creepy.
Spot on, IMO. 18 might be the legal limit but it's not the moral limit for a 40-year-old man. If you forget about the legal limit for a minute, imagine a 19-year-old male engaging in sex with a 17-year-old, or even a 16-year-old. It doesn't raise an eyebrow even though it's illegal. But a 40-year-old male would be tarred and feathered. The legal limit isn't important morally because the difference between 17 and 18 is mostly insignificant.
Having raised daughters, I can tell you that 18-year-old girls are still children. They might look like adults physically but mentally they're just kids. And I can also tell you that if some 40-year-old pervert had put a hand on my daughters when they were 18-year-old, they'd be singing soprano today. The 19-year-old would have just gotten his ass kicked. So 18 just means the 40-year-old is not legally a chomo, but he's still a chomo.
I'm throwing this out just for fum, but the unwritten rule that I've always heard is the lowest acceptable limit is half you age plus seven. So 40/2 + 7 = 27-years-old. Anything above is acceptable. Anything under means you're creepy. And Slaton is way under and definitely creepy.
See how having these smart guys around helps. You now can do the math to ensure you keep all your bits. It's a win/winDamn am I glad I am married! My wife is from the Southside of Chicago, so the only math ol' Bickel has to factor is I sleep with only 1 girl. If that number increases above 1, then my 2 testicles will be removed from my 1 body after I fall asleep.
Ain't no playing around with them Southside girls.
I noticed a lot is posted here, I made this for new guys to catch up.... A BRIEF SUMMARY:
Damn am I glad I am married! My wife is from the Southside of Chicago, so the only math ol' Bickel has to factor is I sleep with only 1 girl. If that number increases above 1, then my 2 testicles will be removed from my 1 body after I fall asleep.
Ain't no playing around with them Southside girls.
i actually believe him. The fact he is stating he made sure they're legal so he could film them isn't a sign of being a good person at all, it shows that he's a sick fuck who knows NOT to record himself fucking with underage girls.IMO, those girls look younger than 18. Do I know that for a fact? No, of course not. But, I sure as fuck don't believe that giant douche David Slaton when HE says they're legal age.
This. Its unanimous, the guy is shiti actually believe him. The fact he is stating he made sure they're legal so he could film them isn't a sign of being a good person at all, it shows that he's a sick fuck who knows NOT to record himself fucking with underage girls.
this guy is beyond a scumbag.
i actually believe him. The fact he is stating he made sure they're legal so he could film them isn't a sign of being a good person at all, it shows that he's a sick fuck who knows NOT to record himself fucking with underage girls.
this guy is beyond a scumbag.
what.the.fuck!!!!They might be legal in Mexico but the age of consent there is only 12!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America
They might be legal in Mexico but the age of consent there is only 12!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America
i actually believe him. The fact he is stating he made sure they're legal so he could film them isn't a sign of being a good person at all, it shows that he's a sick fuck who knows NOT to record himself fucking with underage girls.
this guy is beyond a scumbag.
They might be legal in Mexico but the age of consent there is only 12!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America
Wow, definitely insaneJesus that is so messed up and sick. You can get a fake ID in mx about 3 minutes flat