Valkyrie Pharma Trenbolone E200 - HPLC-UV - 2016-04 - SIMEC via AnabolicLab.com

[showstoppa]

How would what you suggested work for the lab that was tested at underdosed by 20% if they assumed they were at around 70% powder purity?

Did they actually assume they were at 100% purity and underdose the product or just get bad raws? Or did they assume they were around 70% purity as you suggest and say "fuck it" and didn't add extra powder to their recipe, again, intentionally underdosing their product? Guess those are the only options under that scenerio.

Its interesting that a lab would consider losing almost $ 5000 per kilo on overdosing by 20% instead of spending $400 on a test that would let them know what they have purity wise.

Appreciate any clarification. Maybe I'm just doing too.much late thinking on my part.

They mught have assumed they got a good batch of powder and didnt or they assumed 80% and got 60 or assumed 70 and got 50.

99% of the time a lab wont intentionally underdose a products except things l Iike primo and var.

And they don't test because they are lazy and always in a hurry and frankly most dont give a fuck.

 

[blowingup72]

They mught have assumed they got a good batch of powder and didnt or they assumed 80% and got 60 or assumed 70 and got 50.

99% of the time a lab wont intentionally underdose a products except things l Iike primo and var.

And they don't test because they are lazy and always in a hurry and frankly most dont give a fuck.

That's a lot of money to be losing on every kg and overdosing. Gotta be totally lazy to let that go. Business must be great.