What are raws being cut with?

ATodd

Member
I've been absent for a while, but my laptop is broken and I hate typing on this phone. Anyway, if I posted this in the wrong way or format and it upsets you, tough shit. There are other things in life you should be more concerned with, like Super AIDS, one teaspoon of that shit and you're dead in 3 years.....

Anyway I was thinking, all of these tests are being done and of seen numbers thrown around (70%,60%,<50%) for raws coming in. So what does the non-hormone part consist of? I see raws passing M.P. Tests but then be told it's not pure. That takes some effort. You need to find a non-lethal oil soluble, additional material (which is cheaper) to add to the hormone in a specific ratio to give a matching M.P. This shit is already inexpensive to make (I understand the whole human greed aspect) but really? Anyway I guess the main question is, what is that remaining % that I am injecting into myself?
Atodd
 
Personally I don't think lesser quality raws are not being cut with anything...I think during the process of making them determine the quality...most likely products they use to make the raws itself are the impurities...
 
I don't necessarly think it is cut but piss poor manufacturing. The old garbage in garbage out.
If they are starting with low quality materials (cheap) then the synthesis will be incomplete.
This would account for the (filler) which is actually byproducts of incomplete synthesis.

Oh what manafest said :cool:
 
They raws could also be what's left over after more pure raws are produced and extracted for legit pharma use. Extracting more hormone from less pure material has to have diminishing returns, especially when you can sell the left overs on the black market. From the steroid synthesis patents I've looked at, manafest and BIGMESC are probably correct though.
 
I agree that they are not cut. The real question is why a lab would underdose a finished product, especially Test, when it costs less than a $1a gram.

Again it probably comes down to poor manufacturing standards, not greed.
 
All excellent points which actually make sense, I love it when I get intelligent responses. I should have thought of that, I'm going to have to look into the manufacturing process. Still doesn't answer the m.p. Question.
At odd
Also, it does answer the purity questioning, as its more expensive to purify then actually make. With gmp's in place the purity could be higher I think, ( or require expensive catalysts), I guess that's the cost analysis determining factor.
 
Heavy metal contaminates. And that's what sucks! Nobody knows what injecting that shit long term will do. Cancer anyone?
 
I understand what you mean, the most likely answer is that we dont know. I always disagreed with the 98% assays, and what i now understand about labmax, that isnt really giving us definitive proof of much more than th existence of some hormone.

And how do you actually quantify a supposed GMP standard in a foreign country that most likely does not adhere to those standards even if certified.

Hopefully we can find a definitive solution at some point and have the generosity to share it if we do.
 
I don't think they cut them like cocaine.. start pure and cut..
I think all that stuff used to extract the plant based.. whatever
is left in there and has to be purified and they just don't
take the extra steps to do that..

You know what I mean?
I can read about it, but I rather spend my time eating, fucking, and sleeping

M
 
Ah, what doesn't supposedly give you cancer? My grandparents had fun, dangerous, lead filled, toys and surroundings, they're all alive in there late 80's
Atodd
You're right... I'm sure playing with a red caboose in 1940 and injecting heavy metals repeatedly into your body in 2010, is equally just as dangerous.
That's probably why lead-based paints are so sought after, especially in American homes after 1978.... [emoji6]
 
You're right... I'm sure playing with a red caboose in 1940 and injecting heavy metals repeatedly into your body in 2010, is equally just as dangerous.
That's probably why lead-based paints are so sought after, especially in American homes after 1978.... [emoji6]
Lulz...

I was going to say something similar.
 
You guys are great when it comes to intellectual conversation.
And ya i had to ask my kid how to spell that word!
So its good for me to listen.
But please use simple words my phone is over loading with
me getting info.
 
there is one guy in China, maxsource

I had some of their powders tested it was mixed with meat/food additives

they showed some fake lab results claiming to be 98% in fact it was below 50%
 
That's the $10, 000 question.

Considering what we find in baby formula and dog food from China, it is something we should know, but as long as aas are controlled substances we most likely will not find out any time soon.

I ask myself that every time I fire up.
 
Well I guess my point goes toward this, my grandparents didn't know the perils of lead and other heavy metals, we do. Unless you're fortunate to get pharmacy grade, your shit comes from China and probably going to contain some not so nice things. You're not going to test it (I am certain of this) and you are going to inject it anyway (also certain). So really there's no point complaining about cancer.
Warmest regards,
Atodd
 
Back
Top