What is a cows dose of trenbolone?

OmL

Member
I can easily see rough and average weight of a heifer before slaughter, and I can see that they’re, when it’s utilised, implanted with a 200mg pellet. But I can’t seem to find how long that pellet lasts for or for how long or how many implants they get.
 
All I can find is this and all I know the smaller the BB the more tren he (Ab)uses. Not much info really.

Finaplix-H-Trenbolone-Dosage-Used-In-Cattle.jpg

Picture from MPMD.
 
All I can find is this and all I know the smaller the BB the more tren he (Ab)uses. Not much info really.

Finaplix-H-Trenbolone-Dosage-Used-In-Cattle.jpg

Picture from MPMD.
Yeah I kept getting linked to more plates also. I’m going to try incorporate some Tren into a cruise at 40mg a week, I’m 114kg so it’s almost 0.3mg per kg. I know I’m not a cow. But I’m just curious as to how it’s dosed for them.
 
Yeah I kept getting linked to more plates also. I’m going to try incorporate some Tren into a cruise at 40mg a week, I’m 114kg so it’s almost 0.3mg per kg. I know I’m not a cow. But I’m just curious as to how it’s dosed for them.
I actually tried playing around with it too, for some reason it never works for me no matter how low I go on tren, it's never mild enough to enjoy cruising on it, in the end I just feel slightly off. Say equipoise for example, it's super manageable on low doses with cruise lvl of testosterone plus it gives that nice look and boosts strength a bit. It's only my experience, we are all different at the end of the day.
 
All I can find is this and all I know the smaller the BB the more tren he (Ab)uses. Not much info really.

Finaplix-H-Trenbolone-Dosage-Used-In-Cattle.jpg

Picture from MPMD.
Those pellets are supposed to last like a month I think. Been a while since i had to handle them. The application gun has a fat like 10g needle
 
Those pellets are supposed to last like a month I think. Been a while since i had to handle them. The application gun has a fat like 10g needle
So that would be, give or take, 7mg a day for a 700kg cow. So even 40mg a week for me is more than a cow gets.
 

Doesn't stay in thier system for more than 63 days.
Not quite fair to compare because of how cows systems handle it. Odds are You wouldn't be clean of tren within 63 days of taking 200mg.
It's a fun comparison but irrelevant

Edit. Need some Chem pros to answer but Google said tren metabolites are detectable up to 6 days after administration.
But there would have to be a reason cows get it at that dose. Maybe they have a system built to utilize it better after all it wasn't made for humans to begin with.
Also if it has anything to do with base muscle mass and quantifies from that then cows will definitely gain more from a low dose.
I'm on a no hormone farm we don't use them so I can't say from experience.
But I did work at a warehouse that sold them and the cost is way way way higher than just tren ace from any ugl. If it was just the tren farmers would be dosing with ugl gear I garuntee.
 
Last edited:
Why does it matter? When in human clinical use trenbolone was indicated at 50mg a week so 50-100mg a week is considered "safe".

It's interesting that there are no human studies out there on tren. Just three on rodents and on those studies tren has a better safety profile and impact on bloods than test does. They were not using small dosages either. All we know about tren is that it may not be very good for our brains. The rest is pure broscience.
 
Do you dose your antibiotics on how much a cow take?
I think in this context he wants to use the same formula that is/was used to beef up cows, logic says if it's working for a cow, it must work for a human. I'm not saying he's right, but that's what I think and I have wondered this myself back when I read MPMD article on it (pretty interesting though).
 
I think in this context he wants to use the same formula that is/was used to beef up cows, logic says if it's working for a cow, it must work for a human. I'm not saying he's right, but that's what I think and I have wondered this myself back when I read MPMD article on it (pretty interesting though).
If using the same "logic" then take the same amount of antibiotics as a cow because if it's working for a cow it's working for a human
 
Last edited:
I think in this context he wants to use the same formula that is/was used to beef up cows, logic says if it's working for a cow, it must work for a human. I'm not saying he's right, but that's what I think and I have wondered this myself back when I read MPMD article on it (pretty interesting though).
This reminds me of caveman thinking. Like a monkey see monkey do type deal.

I think people take way to much tren. But just start low and taper up until your satisfied
 
If using the same "login" then take the same amount of antibiotics as a cow because if it's working for a cow it's working for a human
First of all, there is no trenbolone dose for humans (tested and tried that is) the one Negma did was inconclusive and short lived. Then, there is more is better when it comes to AAS and this is quite the opposite showing that such a small amount is effective. Finally, I'm not interested in antibiotics they're not in the context and you say take same amount as cow, it's not exactly what I meant, I was saying that there is formula that is used for animal that could be used for human as @OmL was saying.
 
They used to give tren to rodeo bulls too to make them more aggressive. Heard it in a podcast yesterday. Not surprised if it's true though.
 
This reminds me of caveman thinking. Like a monkey see monkey do type deal.

I think people take way to much tren. But just start low and taper up until your satisfied
There is nothing monkey about it. What is monkey and very stupid is that yes bodybuilders my size take 400-700mg of this shit.
 
There is nothing monkey about it. What is monkey and very stupid is that yes bodybuilders my size take 400-700mg of this shit.
It’s like the argument “giant animals only eat grass/vegetation and they’re multiple hundreds of pounds” yet they eat 20+ lbs of food a day.


It just isn’t comparable.
 
It’s like the argument “giant animals only eat grass/vegetation and they’re multiple hundreds of pounds” yet they eat 20+ lbs of food a day.


It just isn’t comparable.
What is comparable is that stupid amounts not even huge animals need, is used by idiots that like side effects, because then they thinks it's working and "no sides, no gains bro" mentality is fucking monkey. Problem is it's a lot of people mindset.
 
Back
Top