Will RFK Jr Deschedule/Decriminalize Testosterone and HGH?

[jj89]

At best, RFK is a nutcase.

If they want to remove something from the water, how about the lead?

Removing the lead is what turned everyone woke!

Bring back the lead so we can MAGA

 

[dontletheoldmanin]

It's highly likely the Democrypts try and block every single thing the Trump administration does. First thing they will try and deny every person he picks for a position then they will scrutinize them one by one in front of the world much like they did with Brett Cavenaugh and that other justice he appointed.

 

[SpicyMeatball]

Really funny seeing you claiming this highly accomplished and very intelligent man is a quack. Tell us more about your grams of BPC and three different injections of testosterone daily protocols. Maybe a look in the mirror is appropriate for you at this time.

The dude pushes the completely unscientific idea that vaccines cause autism (they don’t, it’s been studied into the ground), denies the link between HIV and AIDS (another position that runs contrary to scientific consensus), has touted conspiracy theories such as chemtrails, that Covid was engineered to target certain ethnicities, the 5g bullshit, the list goes on. He is absolutely 100% a quack, which is not mutually exclusive from being accomplished and intelligent. The unabomber was accomplished and intelligent but it would be a bad idea to have given him a cabinet position.

 

[SpicyMeatball]

It's highly likely the Democrypts try and block every single thing the Trump administration does. First thing they will try and deny every person he picks for a position then they will scrutinize them one by one in front of the world much like they did with Brett Cavenaugh and that other justice he appointed.

you understand how the house and senate work? Republicans have a majority in both. Anything that doesn’t pass and any failed confirmations cannot be blamed on the dems.

 

[iris]

It's highly likely the Democrypts try and block every single thing the Trump administration does. First thing they will try and deny every person he picks for a position then they will scrutinize them one by one in front of the world much like they did with Brett Cavenaugh and that other justice he appointed.

I thought he is going to have a good majority, so things could be somewhat easier for him, no?

 

[dontletheoldmanin]

Guess it's a toss up who's better, Rachel or Robert

 

[RekTest]

I thought he is going to have a good majority, so things could be somewhat easier for him, no?

He has control of both chambers of congress and the white house.

Things can actually get done this time.

 

[iris]

The dude pushes the completely unscientific idea that vaccines cause autism (they don’t, it’s been studied into the ground), denies the link between HIV and AIDS (another position that runs contrary to scientific consensus), has touted conspiracy theories such as chemtrails, that Covid was engineered to target certain ethnicities, the 5g bullshit, the list goes on. He is absolutely 100% a quack, which is not mutually exclusive from being accomplished and intelligent. The unabomber was accomplished and intelligent but it would be a bad idea to have given him a cabinet position.

Understood, this is all well known.
But he will not be able to be too "alternative", in such an official position.
I still think let's see and give him a chance.
I am interested in seeing what he does first, to stamp his mark, so to speak.
We will only be able to judge his interventions, as they occur.

 

[SpicyMeatball]

Understood, this is all well known.
But he will not be able to be too "alternative", in such an official position.
I still think let's see and give him a chance.
I am interested in seeing what he does first, to stamp his mark, so to speak.
We will only be able to judge his interventions, as they occur.

Putting a madman in charge and hoping the institutions hold doesn’t strike me as the best way to govern but here we go.

 

[iris]

Putting a madman in charge and hoping the institutions hold doesn’t strike me as the best way to govern but here we go.

You know, we had the WHO doing their best to shamelessly cover China's ass throughout the whole covid pandemic.
To me, that is way worse than putting that individual in charge of an office where, in reality, his influence is going to be stymied by higher level politicians, anyway.
The government can get rid of him in a second, if they so wish.

 

[SpicyMeatball]

You know, we had the WHO doing their best to shamelessly cover China's ass throughout the whole covid pandemic.
To me, that is way worse than putting that individual in charge of an office where, in reality, his influence is going to be stymied by higher level politicians, anyway.
The government can get rid of him in a second, if they so wish.

You can criticize WHO all you want, it doesn’t make rfk suitable for the role. How about a third option: pick someone who is appropriate and not a total nutter as a quid pro quo for their endorsement during the campaign.

I can’t believe I’m talking about politics on mesorx. Please somebody reset the simulation.

 

[Ghoul]

you understand how the house and senate work? Republicans have a majority in both. Anything that doesn’t pass and any failed confirmations cannot be blamed on the dems.

There's always the filibuster. A handful of Republicans can cross the isle to join with Democrat votes.

In both cases it's the Democrats at the root
of failed legislation, they're not powerless.

 

[AlexDavis43]

Things can actually get done this time.

That's what they say every time.

 

[Ghoul]

That's what they say every time.

2029 can't come soon enough, when we can restore some sanity to the leadership of the federal government's medical institutions.

 

[dontletheoldmanin]

You can criticize WHO all you want, it doesn’t make rfk suitable for the role. How about a third option: pick someone who is appropriate and not a total nutter as a quid pro quo for their endorsement during the campaign.

I can’t believe I’m talking about politics on mesorx. Please somebody reset the simulation.

Is any politician suitable? For God sakes Joe Biden is president then went and stole from him and the people and let Kamala Harris run for office.

I'd bet 1000 dollers if she had to go through the proper channel to be voted in she wouldn't be the canadate chosen.

I think RFK is leaps and bounds more intelligent then Kamala, and he's only tasked to try and run the health side of things.

Word for the wise book smart people don't always have real world smarts. (Which is the Democratic problem)

Always interesting to watch Democrats melt down when they lose dramatically but when Republicans melt down it's a laugh..

 

[SpicyMeatball]

Is any politician suitable? For God sakes Joe Biden is president then went and stole from him and the people and let Kamala Harris run for office.

I'd bet 1000 dollers if she had to go through the proper channel to be voted in she wouldn't be the canadate chosen.

I think RFK is leaps and bounds more intelligent then Kamala, and he's only tasked to try and run the health side of things.

Word for the wise book smart people don't always have real world smarts. (Which is the Democratic problem)

Always interesting to watch Democrats melt down when they lose dramatically but when Republicans melt down it's a laugh..

What does any of that have to do with the suitability of RFK? You’re recycling the same “x is worse” tactic as above, but not explaining why you think RFK is a good pick (because we all know he isn’t). If DJT is so amazing why doesn’t anyone expect him to make good appointments, and instead is just like “yeah the guy is a maniac and got the job in exchange for his endorsement but Kamala is bad”

 

[dontletheoldmanin]

What does any of that have to do with the suitability of RFK? You’re recycling the same “x is worse” tactic as above, but not explaining why you think RFK is a good pick (because we all know he isn’t). If DJT is so amazing why doesn’t anyone expect him to make good appointments, and instead is just like “yeah the guy is a maniac and got the job in exchange for his endorsement but Kamala is bad”

I can't argue with a Democrat it's impossible there heads are to inflated.
You say "we all know he's not" don't speak for people you don't know.

RFK will be different and his back ground speaks for that, sure hes had issues thay doesn't make him any less of a person.
Anything is better then what's in there now just look at how sick Americans are.

Anyways not angry or anything but to be fair that were voted in for the time being so let's wait and see how it all unfolds.

 

[Big_Sexy]

I think term limits are going to be amazing. Out with the old and in with the new! RFK has an opportunity to do good things, if he doesn’t work out Trump will fire him THE END.

 

[SpicyMeatball]

O

I can't argue with a Democrat it's impossible there heads are to inflated.
You say "we all know he's not" don't speak for people you don't know.

RFK will be different and his back ground speaks for that, sure hes had issues thay doesn't make him any less of a person.
Anything is better then what's in there now just look at how sick Americans are.

Anyways not angry or anything but to be fair that were voted in for the time being so let's wait and see how it all unfolds.

I guess where we disagree is I don’t think anything is better than the status quo as you say. I think there is a whole lot wrong, but also that a lot of damage can still be done, and it seems likely when picks aren’t made based on competence or suitability for the job. But if you really don’t believe that—you think it is truly as bad as it can get—then I guess I see where you’re coming from.

I’ll be unfollowing this thread now

 

[dontletheoldmanin]

O

I guess where we disagree is I don’t think anything is better than the status quo as you say. I think there is a whole lot wrong, but also that a lot of damage can still be done, and it seems likely when picks aren’t made based on competence or suitability for the job. But if you really don’t believe that—you think it is truly as bad as it can get—then I guess I see where you’re coming from.

I’ll be unfollowing this thread now

Didn't Biden pick a drag queen for office?
I forget the name but this person wasn't at all experienced.
Tit for tat I guess

I can agree with you on some things for sure but only after ive seen said things in action.