How to rig an election

TheGuy85

New Member
Sanders camp suspicious of Microsoft’s influence in Iowa Caucus

Sanders camp suspicious of Microsoft's influence in Iowa Caucus

01/27/16 06:05 PM—UPDATED 01/28/16 02:19 PM

9 share 502
By http://www.msnbc.com/byline/alex-seitz-wald


DES MOINES, Iowa – The campaign of Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders is raising questions about the involvement of Microsoft in the Iowa Caucuses, now just days away, and has built an independent system to check the official results.

For the first time this year, Microsoft partnered with the Iowa Democratic and Republican Parties to provide a technology platform with which the parties will run their caucuses. The software giant created separate mobile apps for each party, which officials at hundreds of caucuses across the state will use to report out results from individual precincts to party headquarters for tabulation.

RELATED: Can Bernie Sanders handle the burn?

The arrangement has aroused the suspicions of aides to Sanders, who regularly warn that corporate power and the billionaire class are trying to hijack democracy. Pete D’Alessandro, who is running the Iowa portion of Sanders’ campaign, questioned the motives of the major multinational corporation in an interview with MSNBC: “You’d have to ask yourself why they’d want to give something like that away for free.”

The Sanders campaign has built their own reporting system to check the results from the official Microsoft-backed app. It has trained its precinct captain on using the app, which is designed to be as user friendly as possible, and the campaign will also staff a hotline system as further redundancy.

“It’s just a way that our folks can have an app that we trust to get the numbers to us in a timely fashion,” D’Alessandro said. “I’m always going to be more for sure on the stuff that my people had control over the entire time… If there are any problems, we can spot them right away.”

Other Sanders aides noted thathttps://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/toprecips.php?id=D000000115&type=P&sort=A&cycle=2008several hundred thousand dollars to Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton over her career, and questioned why the Iowa Democratic Party didn’t partner with a software company based in Iowa.

Asked why the company is interested in the caucuses, Microsoft said they are committed to creating a fair and impartial platform. “Microsoft is providing technology and services solely to administer and facilitate a neutral, accurate, efficient reporting system for the caucuses,” the company said in a statement to MSNBC. ”We are proud to partner with the Iowa Democratic and Republican parties to ensure accurate results on caucus night.”

Independent reporting systems like the one Sanders’ campaign built are not uncommon. Clinton’s campaign is also preparing its own backup reporting system involving an app and telephone hotline component, according to a campaign aide.

Some Iowa Democrats have raised concerns about the state party’s readiness for the critical caucuses on Monday. As many as 200 precinct-level positions were still unfilled as off a few days ago, and several campaigns have complained about late-stage caucus-site location changes.

D’Alessandro said he has complete confidence in the Iowa Democratic Party, and “absolute trust on integrity,” explaining that his own issue was with Microsoft only.

Sam Lau, a spokesperson for the Iowa Democratic Party, defended the partnership with Microsoft. “The Iowa Democratic Party has always believed in the importance of new election technology, and we have been proud to partner with both the Republican Party of Iowa and Microsoft on our new 2016 Iowa Caucuses reporting app that has been in the works for more than a year. Microsoft and their App partner, InterKnowlogy, are global leaders in the technology industry, and we completely trust the integrity of their staff and the app. The app will help make caucus reporting more efficient, accurate and secure, and we look forward to seeing it in action on caucus night,” he said in a statement.

RELATED: Hillary camp steps up Sanders attacks in Iowa

Skepticism about corporate involvement in election systems is nothing new. During the 2004 presidential election, for instance, there was widespread suspicion on the left about Diebold voting machines.

With Sanders supporters already suspicious of meddling from forces they see as hostile to their candidate, including the Democratic Party and corporations, the backup system could help tamp down questions and conspiracy theories if results are contested.



Sanders Campaign: Party Lost 5 Percent of Iowa Vote
By Jason DickPosted at 2-2-2016

http://atr.rollcall.com/sanders-campaign-party-lost-5-percent-of-iowa-vote/

0 Comments
©Reprints





02.01.16_Becker_Iowa.png

The Iowa Democratic Party has lost the results of 90 precincts. (Photo Courtesy Brent Roske)

DES MOINES, Iowa — The Iowa Democratic Party informed the campaigns of Hillary Clinton and Sen. Bernard Sanders late Monday night that it has no results for 90 precincts across the state, which could account for as much as 5 percent of the total vote. And the party has asked the campaigns for help in getting a tally for those missing results.

“We are, right now, calling all our precinct captains on precincts where we have knowledge of what’s missing, to report what we think happened there,” a visibly irate Robert Becker, Sanders’ state director told Roll Call after Sanders’ speech at the Holiday Inn near the Des Moines airport.

“They’ve asked the other campaigns to do the same thing. At the end of the day, there’s probably going to be squabbles on it,” he added.

An Iowa Democratic Party official disputed Becker’s characterization.

“We are currently getting results from our small number of outstanding precincts, and results continue to be reported on our public website,” an Iowa Democratic Party official told Roll Call. “The reports of precincts without chairs are inaccurate. These outstanding precincts have chairs who we are in the process of contacting to get their results. It is inaccurate to report that these precincts did not have chairs.”

“We have reached out to the campaigns for help in contacting the chairs for our outstanding precincts. We are not taking results from the campaigns. We are taking them from the chairs who are in these precincts,” the official added.

Clinton and Sanders were locked in a virtual tie at the conclusion of Monday’s caucuses, with both at 49 percent and Clinton clinging to a razor-thin lead.

“The party has a responsibility to staff 1,681 individual precincts. And what we’re seeing right now is that they had no-shows. People not showing up with the materials, not showing up with the app to report it. And when they’re telling us an hour ago that they have basically lost 90 precincts, it’s an outrage,” Becker said. “It’s insulting to the people who worked their asses off across this state that they can’t come up with people to cover these things.”

Attempts to reach the Clinton campaign early Tuesday were unsuccessful.

“I’m assuming they’re in the same boat. And they should be just as outraged as we are,” Becker fumed.
 
Personally, I would be more concerned about her winning 6 coin tosses in a row.
 
IOWA CAUCUSES
Missing precinct scrambles to report Sanders won

Missing precinct scrambles to report Sanders won

Jennifer Jacobs 18 minutes ago
Facebook
  • party's website has now been updated to reflect that Sanders won 58.3 percent and Clinton won 41.7 percent in precinct No. 42.

    Party officials had worked into the early morning Tuesday trying to account for results from a handful of tardy precincts in the extremely close presidential caucus race between Sanders and Hillary Clinton.

    But they announced that Clinton had eked out a slim victory, based on results from 1,682 of 1,683 precincts, a statement emailed at 2:30 a.m. said.

    Team Clinton quickly embraced that news, and flatly stated that nothing could change it.

    Party Chairwoman Andy McGuire in the 2:30 a.m. statement said: "Hillary Clinton has been awarded 699.57 state delegate equivalents, Bernie Sanders has been awarded 695.49 state delegate equivalents, Martin O’Malley has been awarded 7.68 state delegate equivalents and uncommitted has been awarded .46 state delegate equivalents. We still have outstanding results in one precinct - Des Moines 42 - which is worth 2.28 state delegate equivalents. We will report that final precinct when we have confirmed those results with the chair."

    Clinton's Iowa campaign director Matt Paul said in a statement at 2:35 a.m.: "Hillary Clinton has won the Iowa Caucus. After thorough reporting – and analysis – of results, there is no uncertainty and Secretary Clinton has clearly won the most national and state delegates. Statistically, there is no outstanding information that could change the results and no way that Senator Sanders can overcome Secretary Clinton's advantage."

    McGuire could not immediately be reached for comment Tuesday morning.

    The scene at precinct No. 42 was "chaos" Monday night, Joseph told the Register. None of the 400-plus Democrats wanted wanted to be in charge of the caucus, so a man who had shown up just to vote reluctantly stepped forward. As Joseph was leaving with the untrained caucus chairman, who is one of her neighbors, "I looked at him and said, 'Who called in the results of our caucus?' And we didn't know."

    The impromptu chairman of Des Moines No. 42 told the Register when he realized his precinct had the key to the final missing votes, he took Tuesday off work and was driving home to get the paperwork. But he didn't know who was logging the tallies.

    With No. 42's results, Clinton's excruciatingly close lead narrowed further, and voters there called into question whether Sanders may have actually won.

    Late on caucus night, the party had reached out to the Clinton and Sanders campaigns to ask for their help in tracking down missing results. Iowa Democratic Party Executive Director Ben Foecke sent an email to both campaigns with a spreadsheet of contacts for temporary caucus chairs. The campaigns were directing those people to dial into a hotline to report their results.

    The Sanders campaign was calling temporary caucus chairs to track down results as well as checking with campaign volunteers early Tuesday.

    A representative of Clinton's campaign said early Tuesday that the campaign was not involved in tracking down temporary caucus chairs.

    At Democratic caucuses, a temporary caucus chair is usually selected before caucus night to run a precinct caucus, where the same person is often elected as the permanent caucus chair. That person is responsible for running the caucus and reporting results back to the party.

    Sanders campaign officials said they were notified early Sunday morning that 137 chairs were still not identified. But in its statement Tuesday morning, the state party said the missing precincts did have chairs assigned to them.

    "These outstanding precincts have chairs who we are in the process of contacting to get their results," the statement said. "It is inaccurate to report that these precincts did not have chairs."

    The complications came four years after an embarrassing mix-up of results in the Republican Iowa caucuses. The state party at first declared former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney the winner by eight votes on caucus night, but former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum was later declared the official winner by 34 votes after a certified count.

    Pete D'Alessandro, Sanders' Iowa campaign coordinator, said he doesn't question the integrity of the state party. But he said the last-minute scramble probably meant many caucus chairs weren't properly trained on how to report their voting results.

    "You’re always worried. In a close race, you want to get it right," D'Alessandro said. "You want to get it right both as a campaign. But because the whole world is watching us, we want to get it right as a caucus."

    If you have information on confusion in reporting results, or on why some precincts were late in reporting Monday night, please email Jennifer Jacobs at jejacobs@dmreg.com
 
Nope, and I find myself liking a socialist more and more everyday because I hate it so much.
I don't think I'm qualified to decide who should have so much power over other people, but I speak with authority when I say no one running should have it. But I do sort of agree Bernie would do the least harm. He's a non interventionist (more or less) and none of his socialist agenda will ever make it through Congress.
 
I don't think I'm qualified to decide who should have so much power over other people, but I speak with authority when I say no one running should have it. But I do sort of agree Bernie would do the least harm. He's a non interventionist (more or less) and none of his socialist agenda will ever make it through Congress.

I find his populist movement and comments about delivering democracy back into the hands of the American people, inspiring, even if I don't agree with his views on economics. I do agree with his views on American democracy and I like his "we the people" message. I agree, socialism is something that will have to pass through Congress (which I don't see happening) and when you take his socialist message away, he becomes more palatable, IMO. I think in that way, he transcends beyond just being the self-proclaimed socialist, and he represents something greater that restores the American people's faith in democracy.
 
From C-span... you have to see the video

Clinton voter fraud in Polk County, Iowa Caucus

Caucus chair and Clinton precinct captain do not conduct actual count of Clinton supporters and deliberately mislead caucus.

That is deeply disturbing. That's how Hillary will treat the presidency, I assume. And they say Sanders is the radical one; I guess a fair election and democracy are radical ideas. I didn't see this, that clearly shows Clinton supporters skewing votes in her favor. Great way to attract new voters to the Democratic Party, I am sure all the kids are lining up to fix elections just like that. They are going to piss off Bernie supporters, and then they won't show up in the general election because of it, and they may even vote against Hillary if they feel like they got screwed over. Smart people, Hillary may be the GOP's greatest ally, yet; she will make sure Republicans win the presidency.
 
Last edited:
That is deeply disturbing. That's how Hillary will treat the presidency, I assume. And they say Sanders is the radical one; I guess a fair election and democracy are radical ideas. I didn't see this, that clearly shows Clinton supporters skewing votes in her favor. Great way to attract new voters to the Democratic Party, I am sure all the kids are lining up to fix elections just like that. They are going to piss off Bernie supporters, and then they won't show up in the general election because of it, and they may even vote against Hillary if they feel like they got screwed over. Smart people, Hillary may be the GOP's greatest ally, yet; she will make sure Republicans win the presidency.

As much as I would like to I can't really blame it on Hillary. I'm sure what we saw is business as usual for many voting stations. It was just more blatant than usual and right in front of c-span cameras. People start thinking of candidates as good and evil (I only think evil, but that's just me) and believe skewing the results in favor of their "good" candidate is the right thing to do. Welcome to representative democracy where the counters count and the voters don't.

Oh yea, and not one word about it on the local news this morning.
 
Donald Trump accuses Ted Cruz of voter fraud, demands ‘new election’ in Iowa

By Dylan Stableford
15 hours ago

Two days after finishing second to Ted Cruz in the Iowa caucuses, Donald Trump is accusing the Texas senator of fraud and demanding that either a “new election” take place in the Hawkeye State or that its results be “nullified.”

“Ted Cruz didn’t win Iowa, he stole it,” Trumptweeted on Wednesday. “That is why all of the polls were so wrong and why he got far more votes than anticipated. Bad!”

Trump accused the Cruz campaign of misleading caucus-goers by circulating a false election-night rumor implying that retired neurosurgeon Ben Carson was planning to drop out of the race.

The Cruz campaign issued an apology to Carson on Tuesday, saying it should have clarified that Carson was, in fact, continuing his bid for the Republican nomination.

Trump also made mention of a deceptive mailer distributed by the Cruz campaign designed to shame Iowa voters into caucusing.

“Based on the fraud committed by Senator Ted Cruz during the Iowa Caucus, either a new election should take place or Cruz results nullified,” Trump tweeted.

“Reality has hit the reality star,” Cruz campaign spokesman Rick Tyler responded in a statement. “Since Iowa, no one is talking about Donald Trump. That’s why he’s popping off on Twitter. There are Twitter addiction therapy groups, and he should check in with his local chapter.”

The accusations stand in stark contrast to Trump’s concession speech, in which the brash billionaire struck a conciliatory tone.

“We finished second, and I want to tell you something,” he said late Monday in Des Moines. “I’m just honored. I’m really honored. And I want to congratulate Ted, and I want to congratulate all of the incredible candidates.”

On NBC’s “Today” show Wednesday, Trump said he was “semi-satisfied” with his second-place finish.

“I came in second, and nobody said it was a victory. It’s kind of strange,” he said. “I beat a lot of senators, a lot of governors. They do it professionally. I’ve never done this before. I’m not a professional politician, and I came in second. It was such a big story that I came in second. I don’t know why. I was actually semi-satisfied with it.”

Before a rally in New Hampshire on Tuesday, Trump admitted his decision to boycott Fox News’ GOP debate may have cost him in the caucuses.

“I think some people were disappointed that I didn’t go into the debate,” he told reporters.


tumblr_inline_o1zfm0rlAc1tdoo3z_1280.jpg
 
Back
Top