This was inside my ansomone box from drugsgear... what is it?

[picholas]

@mands

Correct me if I am wrong here. Thanks.

 

[Dohn joe]

I believe it was discussed before and as long as it was something that was actually beneficial to the community, directly pertaining to said question and not bashing others or trying to push your own gear then its not as bad. Obviously try to limit it as much as possible and getting into an arguement or simple disagreement when asked to stop will always make the source the bad guy.

Others have done it and it was cool because it was good information and the source wasnt a dick. Perhaps you need to be around a bit longer to get granted that status.

 

[Eman]

I did read and I have to disagree I would think source is a member. A member is most likely anyone with a registered account but like I said for arguments sake I will stick to mine unless asked to comment

I personally didn't have a problem with you posting in here since it was to be helpful. Overall, if you're posting outside of your thread infrequently and only to offer help like you did here.. no one will say anything.

With that said, it is useless for you to argue that you are a member here. You are a source on this board, not a member. This is how it is here.

 

[D-max]

I personally didn't have a problem with you posting in here since it was to be helpful. Overall, if you're posting outside of your thread infrequently and only to offer help like you did here.. no one will say anything.

With that said, it is useless for you to argue that you are a member here. You are a source on this board, not a member. This is how it is here.

Agree 100%. We have several sources here who have a lot of knowledge and can be very helpful. It's stupid to keep them locked in their own thread.

I think a far better rule would be to not let new members post in the underground until they've been here for at least a year. Think of how much cleaner and less chest beating there'd be.....[emoji848][emoji57]

 

[AnTabolic73]

Agree 100%. We have several sources here who have a lot of knowledge and can be very helpful. It's stupid to keep them locked in their own thread.

I think a far better rule would be to not let new members post in the underground until they've been here for at least a year. Think of how much cleaner and less chest beating there'd be.....[emoji848][emoji57]

Brilliant.

 

[Eman]

Agree 100%. We have several sources here who have a lot of knowledge and can be very helpful. It's stupid to keep them locked in their own thread.

I think a far better rule would be to not let new members post in the underground until they've been here for at least a year. Think of how much cleaner and less chest beating there'd be.....[emoji848][emoji57]

There'd likely be zero difference.

Overall, sources should stay in their thread... I just meant there are exceptions to the rule albeit few and far between.

 

[D-max]

There'd likely be zero difference.

You're probably right. It sure sounded good for a minute there though.[emoji23]

 

[Morefyah]

Brilliant.

The underground is probably the most

There'd likely be zero difference.

Overall, sources should stay in their thread... I just meant there are exceptions to the rule albeit few and far between.

I agree, sources becoming “yes” men or trying to bro down with members to get on there good side doesn’t seem like a bad business decision. I’m sure this never happens on other forums? Roll my eyes!!

Imo source relation outside of the sources thread can and usually does end up being a conflict of interest. So with that being said this is @Millard Baker house and if he wants to give them free roam so be it. I respect his decision though I personally don’t think it’s in the best interest of the members here.

I’m done

 

[Millard]

So with that being said this is @Millard Baker house and if he wants to give them free roam so be it.

Not at all what I said. you are certainly not helping matters with such mischaracterization

 

[Morefyah]

Not at all what I said. you are certainly not helping matters with such mischaracterization

Sorry I’m just looking out for out members best interest. I was being a bit facetious about the free roam comment. Your right there are certain sources and reps that are truly stand up guys and I appreciate there feedback and knowledge. Then there are others that ulterior motives. I’m on your side @Millard Baker and I stand bye and respect what you’ve built here. Sorry if I ruffled any feathers.