Parent? Read this important info about their behaviors and what they mean.

[Sworder]

Having a challenge so I don’t die of boredom. I enjoy the struggle.

By this way of thinking, do you think life is easier now or when you were young?

We have had an effect of course. As far as chemical, garbage, radioactive pollution it has been bad, but has been changing for the better for decades. CO2 has had a positive effect.

So can you please provide the links and support now for how CO2 has had a positive effect?

We agree that it’s not a pollutant then.

No, I would say that Co2 creates negative effects for our environment.

Have you ever been in a garage with a car running?

Bwahaaa, fuck that funny. I don’t have low self esteem. I just feel good when I complete a challenge. I don’t see the issue in performing and feeling good about yourself. What’s the opposite, lay around and feel sorry for myself, lol.

That's the thing, there are people out there that feel good about themselves without having to accomplish tasks. You obviously take AAS, why do you think you take AAS if it isnt' for low self-esteem or confidence?

Oh I am the opposite of low self esteem, god they make jokes about it at work.

People with low self esteem have an extreme need to satisfy a feeling of accomplishment. Trust me, you have it

Anyhow I gotta do some yoga and go to bed. Works insane right now.

Later @Sworder

Have a good night

 

[johntt44]

By this way of thinking, do you think life is easier now or when you were young?

So can you please provide the links and support now for how CO2 has had a positive effect?


No, I would say that Co2 creates negative effects for our environment.

Have you ever been in a garage with a car running?



That's the thing, there are people out there that feel good about themselves without having to accomplish tasks. You obviously take AAS, why do you think you take AAS if it isnt' for low self-esteem or confidence?

People with low self esteem have an extreme need to satisfy a feeling of accomplishment. Trust me, you have it

Have a good night

Car exhaust is Co not Co2. Itscarbon monoxide not dioxide single oxygen atom. Plants breathe in Co2 which is one use.

 

[GDL]

Car exhaust is Co not Co2. Itscarbon monoxide not dioxide single oxygen atom. Plants breathe in Co2 which is one use.

Without plantlife we all die.

 

[Sworder]

Car exhaust is Co not Co2. Itscarbon monoxide not dioxide single oxygen atom. Plants breathe in Co2 which is one use.

CO = Carbon Monoxide
CO2= Carbon Dioxide

Are you saying that a car doesn't release CO2?

 

[LeoTC]

People have been working at curbing climate change for decades. They didn't run around demanding change and were largely ignored.

Trump and his EPA have rolled back numerous regulations with regard to waste disposal, run off, drilling, mining, etc.

One of the first things he did once in office was scrap the environmental impact review ordered for the continuation of the DA pipeline. Which has sin e spilled hundreds of gallons of oil. Keystone as well.

As far as climate cycles being unpredictable? Check out something called the Milankovich Cycle. Its actually so predictable that a mathematician was able to map them almost a hundred years ago.

A simple conversion to alcohol would would produce zero emissions generators. Most currently in service could actually be switched over without modification, except maybe software changes.

But big oil doesn't like that. They worked hard to have alcohol distilling locked down and fuel production centralized.

 

[Sworder]

People have been working at curbing climate change for decades. They didn't run around demanding change and were largely ignored.

Trump and his EPA have rolled back numerous regulations with regard to waste disposal, run off, drilling, mining, etc.

One of the first things he did once in office was scrap the environmental impact review ordered for the continuation of the DA pipeline. Which has sin e spilled hundreds of gallons of oil. Keystone as well.

As far as climate cycles being unpredictable? Check out something called the Milankovich Cycle. Its actually so predictable that a mathematician was able to map them almost a hundred years ago.

A simple conversion to alcohol would would produce zero emissions generators. Most currently in service could actually be switched over without modification, except maybe software changes.

But big oil doesn't like that. They worked hard to have alcohol distilling locked down and fuel production centralized.

There is a lot we can do to fix the climate problem. I like the idea of injecting sulfur into the ozone. Might strip the earth of the ozone layer but it sure as hell takes care of the CO2 problem. We can start doing away with a lot of the high altitude clouds as well, they increase global warming.

 

[GDL]

By this way of thinking, do you think life is easier now or when you were young?

Way easier

So can you please provide the links and support now for how CO2 has had a positive effect?


No, I would say that Co2 creates negative effects for our environment.

Have you ever been in a garage with a car running?

Pointed out below. No co2 no life. All major life started with plants consuming co2. Well maybe because there was not enough o2 for anything to survive. Thank god for co2 and plants. Now trees they are evil.

That's the thing, there are people out there that feel good about themselves without having to accomplish tasks. You obviously take AAS, why do you think you take AAS if it isnt' for low self-esteem or confidence?

I take aas because at 43 I started to feel weak. I never used steroids when I was younger. Truth be told I thought guys that used gear to cheat were losers. I waited until my natural test levels were toast. It’s so I can live a better quality of life and still works hard, lol. You know accomplish tasks.

People with low self esteem have an extreme need to satisfy a feeling of accomplishment. Trust me, you have it

I guess you think I do, and that’s ok, I’m good with that. It doesn’t effect the way I look at myself. I’d rather be satisfied accomplishing something than be a lazy piece of crap looking for a handout.
Guess that’s why I had to marry a hot woman and drive stupid fast vehicles as well. Oh for a bit I had a 6” lifted Ford truck, with 48s also. Had to sell it though because the dildo that started it had stretched the ignition and kept falling out, lol. Yeah I just said Fords are gay, now I’m homophobic, lol.

Have a good night

 

[LeoTC]

There is a lot we can do to fix the climate problem. I like the idea of injecting sulfur into the ozone. Might strip the earth of the ozone layer but it sure as hell takes care of the CO2 problem. We can start doing away with a lot of the high altitude clouds as well, they increase global warming.

I mean, we could just move back to cleaner and more economic power and sources too.

And destroying acres of forestland and leagues of ocean for financial and political gain too. That'd be great.

 

[GDL]

There is a lot we can do to fix the climate problem. I like the idea of injecting sulfur into the ozone. Might strip the earth of the ozone layer but it sure as hell takes care of the CO2 problem. We can start doing away with a lot of the high altitude clouds as well, they increase global warming.

God we don’t have a co2 problem. Shit you’ve benpen brainwashed.



You won’t watch them, but I could do this for days.

 

[Sworder]

I mean, we could just move back to cleaner and more economic power and sources too.

No we can't...

 

[GDL]

I mean, we could just move back to cleaner and more economic power and sources too.

And destroying acres of forestland and leagues of ocean for financial and political gain too. That'd be great.

What’s cleaner than natural gas?
Fuck the trees, they helped to almost cause the collapse of our ecosystem. Partly kidding

 

[Sworder]

God we don’t have a co2 problem. Shit you’ve benpen brainwashed.

I asked you before what you thought the climate crisis was about. I have read my fair share of information about it so I am curious to hear what you think the issue scientists have.

You won’t watch them, but I could do this for days.

No, I don't take YouTube videos as valid information. Please provide scholarly articles.

 

[Sworder]

Guess that’s why I had to marry a hot woman and drive stupid fast vehicles as well. Oh for a bit I had a 6” lifted Ford truck, with 48s also.

Yes, you are correct about that.

You should read this whole thread.

 

[Sworder]

Simultaneous stabilization of global temperature and precipitation through cocktail geoengineering

Error - Cookies Turned Off


Abstract
Solar geoengineering has been proposed as a backup plan to offset some aspects of anthropogenic climate change if timely CO2 emission reductions fail to materialize. Modeling studies have shown that there are trade‐offs between changes in temperature and hydrological cycle in response to solar geoengineering. Here we investigate the possibility of stabilizing both global mean temperature and precipitation simultaneously by combining two geoengineering approaches: stratospheric sulfate aerosol increase (SAI) that deflects sunlight to space and cirrus cloud thinning (CCT) that enables more longwave radiation to escape to space. Using the slab ocean configuration of National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Earth System Model, we simulate SAI by uniformly adding sulfate aerosol in the upper stratosphere and CCT by uniformly increasing cirrus cloud ice particle falling speed. Under an idealized warming scenario of abrupt quadrupling of atmospheric CO2, we show that by combining appropriate amounts of SAI and CCT geoengineering, global mean (or land mean) temperature and precipitation can be restored simultaneously to preindustrial levels. However, compared to SAI, cocktail geoengineering by mixing SAI and CCT does not markedly improve the overall similarity between geoengineered climate and preindustrial climate on regional scales. Some optimal spatially nonuniform mixture of SAI with CCT might have the potential to better mitigate climate change at both the global and regional scales.

 

[GDL]

I asked you before what you thought the climate crisis was about. I have read my fair share of information about it so I am curious to hear what you think the issue scientists have.


No, I don't take YouTube videos as valid information. Please provide scholarly articles.

Well then I stop debating this with you. Those are actual scientists being interviewed. The first one is the scientist that spent 38 years of his life studying co2 and it’s effects on climate. He was also a colleague with the man whom invented the original climate model. Too bad you are too closed minded.

Btw scientists agree that climate change is happening, but cannot agree if we are causing it.

 

[GDL]

Simultaneous stabilization of global temperature and precipitation through cocktail geoengineering

Error - Cookies Turned Off


Abstract
Solar geoengineering has been proposed as a backup plan to offset some aspects of anthropogenic climate change if timely CO2 emission reductions fail to materialize. Modeling studies have shown that there are trade‐offs between changes in temperature and hydrological cycle in response to solar geoengineering. Here we investigate the possibility of stabilizing both global mean temperature and precipitation simultaneously by combining two geoengineering approaches: stratospheric sulfate aerosol increase (SAI) that deflects sunlight to space and cirrus cloud thinning (CCT) that enables more longwave radiation to escape to space. Using the slab ocean configuration of National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Earth System Model, we simulate SAI by uniformly adding sulfate aerosol in the upper stratosphere and CCT by uniformly increasing cirrus cloud ice particle falling speed. Under an idealized warming scenario of abrupt quadrupling of atmospheric CO2, we show that by combining appropriate amounts of SAI and CCT geoengineering, global mean (or land mean) temperature and precipitation can be restored simultaneously to preindustrial levels. However, compared to SAI, cocktail geoengineering by mixing SAI and CCT does not markedly improve the overall similarity between geoengineered climate and preindustrial climate on regional scales. Some optimal spatially nonuniform mixture of SAI with CCT might have the potential to better mitigate climate change at both the global and regional scales.

Temperature increasing thru co2 was debunked along time ago.

 

[GDL]

Yes, you are correct about that.

You should read this whole thread.

I did, and hopefully one day, I’ll be as judgemental as you, lol.

 

[johntt44]

CO = Carbon Monoxide
CO2= Carbon Dioxide

Are you saying that a car doesn't release CO2?

No, not at all but you were talking about an enclosed garage with the engine running. Co2 is benign compared to Co in that situation.

 

[Sworder]

I did, and hopefully one day, I’ll be as judgemental as you, lol.

Yes, I am always judging, always interpreting, aren't you?

Temperature increasing thru co2 was debunked along time ago.

I seriously didn't get that memo.

Well then I stop debating this with you. Those are actual scientists being interviewed. The first one is the scientist that spent 38 years of his life studying co2 and it’s effects on climate.

38 years as a scientist but 0 research papers for me to read? Hmm...

He was also a colleague with the man whom invented the original climate model. Too bad you are too closed minded.

Yes, I filter out bad information.

Btw scientists agree that climate change is happening, but cannot agree if we are causing it.

I have asked you three times now to explain what you think climate change is even?!

 

[Sworder]

No, not at all but you were talking about an enclosed garage with the engine running. Co2 is benign compared to Co in that situation.

Okay, we were talking about the definition of a pollutant and GDL was saying that he didn't think CO2 would fall into the classification of a pollutant. Which you can read the definition above.

My point was that CO2 isn't good for you. If you disagree, that's fine.