Proof of this? If this is true, sweet. I feel even more comfortable with the thought that GAB won't come off the internet now. Thanks for the info! : )
230...
And again, for the last time, but maybe just enough times so you can finally understand what the law says...
Section 230 of the CDA is protection for platforms, not publishers. Restrictions on free speech when this isn't occurring makes you a publisher. See items below that are NOT covered by 1A... again...
Have you done any reading into the media's collusion with democrats? Are we really talking about a private company making private company decisions when they are actively working with a specific branch of the government? Or are we talking about an extension of the government? Have you seen any of the leaked zoom calls? It's not a "maybe". It happened and is still happening. There is dumb, ignorant, negligent and lying. What category do you fall into when you say "private company"?
You will see legal changes to 230 and what punishments are able to be levied against platforms that play publisher. This will happen for 1 reason only...
unlawful censorship against liberals. You will see conservatives continue to build their own networks, financial institutions, streaming services, etc. Liberals will not be allowed to participate and they will actively be thrown out of these "conservative eco systems". This will be the catalyst for 230 to come under the microscope to drive the change. We all know when a liberal can't get what they want they decide to do whatever they can to legislate (illegally in most cases as if recent) change, even if it means destroying everything wholesome in their path. You know, like having a father in the house. They effectively removed that from a majority of their households inside most major city limits (mainly because they can't seem to keep daddy sober and working). Down with the patriarchy!! Fathers are a construct of white supremacy!! Working out well for them, eh?
Still waiting for any post on any social media site that you can use to prove your statement. Kinda like sampei with the "gun store" claim. You won't post, because you can't.
Thats what you come back with? Not even remotely close to fun. Wtf. Lame faggot you are. Fwiw, if you picture a Ben Affleck/Matt Damon bantering, maybe like a good will hunting candor, you'd be able to not get so offended when someone says shit like that. Don't be such a pussy. I get it, you can do 1000 push ups and squat an unloaded semi trailer... nobody wants to see a jacked up dude sitting in the corner whining about the foul words someone used. That basically makes you a Keebler elf.
@Demondosage see what I did there? I think Keebler elf is the new go to. I mean, it will be combined with fag tho. Have to keep it 90s.
@muscletrain the sad truth to all of this is it'll never end peacefully. It will end with another war inside the 48. The happy thing about it is everyone that is being leveraged as "tools of war" are waking up. People are realizing that it isn't a black and white thing. It's not a white collar blue collar thing. It's not an educated uneducated thing. It's a "keep us in power and enact a NWO" thing. The media, central banking system and associates are the enemy and they're playing us citizens like a fiddle.
There are ex BLM activists that are walking away from BLM in droves. They're communicating with rednecks like me and finding out that we have much more in common than they thought. Liberals are walking away from the democratic party faster than democrats can recruit. This is verifiable fact.
230 cements the ability to drive a narrative even if it's a blatant lie. A majority of the country sees it for what it is. Christians getting persecuted for religious beliefs... blacks following white domestic terrorists under the guise of BLM... msm not reporting on the domestic terror rates of minorities and over reporting the comparative few idiot whites that act like savages.
If I go on Facebook and post a SPLC statistic that shows blacks are joining hates groups at a 3x over whites I will get banned. If I post FBI stats (bureau of justice crime victimization) that show blacks being perpetrators in violent hates crimes against white people by a ratio of 10 to 1, I will get banned.
That's a private company deciding what they publish when those stats are removed and I get banned. That's not a platform. I get standing up for something when it's appropriate, but I don't understand digging your heals in when it's clearly flawed in a disastrous way.
230 has more holes in it than the gay peep show booths mindless visits. It needs to be amended, tweeked, whatever. It's clearly a boat taking on water.
My final statement would be who owns the media? Who owns the entities that stand to gain fiscally from all of this? Follow these two trails and you'll find the real enemy.
View attachment 142290
www.statista.com
