kosp
Member
I train Push/Pull/Legs/Arms scheme and I was doing deadlifts on the pull day, about 4 effective sets after the warm-up+aproximation. About 80-85% RM.
Problem is, after that, I note a huge drop in performance in the next exercises compared to not doing deadlifts on pull day, pull-ups and rows got weak.
Instead, if I don´t do deadlifts, I do nice strong weighted pull-ups at 6-8 reps, and then dropping the weight and doing bodyweight for higher reps, sets till total pull-up failure. Then go to the rows and nice and clean one-arm heavy dumbells and continuing afterward with pulleys and cables for 12-20 reps for pumping blood.
My point is deadlifts consume too much energy and they don´t beat pull-ups and rows in terms of back hypertrophy, what´s more, the contraction is superior in those later pull exercises. And I can´t get deadlifts on legs day because if I do squats, I am going to kill it.
Does this resonate with someone?
Problem is, after that, I note a huge drop in performance in the next exercises compared to not doing deadlifts on pull day, pull-ups and rows got weak.
Instead, if I don´t do deadlifts, I do nice strong weighted pull-ups at 6-8 reps, and then dropping the weight and doing bodyweight for higher reps, sets till total pull-up failure. Then go to the rows and nice and clean one-arm heavy dumbells and continuing afterward with pulleys and cables for 12-20 reps for pumping blood.
My point is deadlifts consume too much energy and they don´t beat pull-ups and rows in terms of back hypertrophy, what´s more, the contraction is superior in those later pull exercises. And I can´t get deadlifts on legs day because if I do squats, I am going to kill it.
Does this resonate with someone?
