bigMoJo
Member
I brought the discussion from the QSC thread here, regarding the USPS and CBP "implementing" procedures to "collect" additional/increased "duties/tariff's."
I've found reporting verifying what you're saying @Ghoul. But, havn't found the actual "procedures" USPS & CBP plan on utilizing. I posted a link to that after the quotes below...
NOTE: This report also covers the EU responding to "De Minimus" type exemptions to their countries as well.
www.bbc.com
I've found reporting verifying what you're saying @Ghoul. But, havn't found the actual "procedures" USPS & CBP plan on utilizing. I posted a link to that after the quotes below...
It's the same template shoving politics into here lately. The same lines, the same "recruiting" behavior, trying to harness the frustration of people unable to access cheap gear to "convert" them to the ideology of the poster.
The end of De Minimus for China and all the problems it caused for acquiring AAS, Sched III drugs, were long coming and probably the most bi-partisan issue in a decade.
When I warned people they should consider "stocking up" last August it wasn't dependent on who got elected.
And De minimus is still over for China btw, there's been no "flip flop".
De minimus is an exemption from customs scrutiny and duty.
Duties aren't being imposed, but the rest, full customs documentation is required,
This documentation is how customs primarily determines which packs are suspicious and which aren't.
The post office said, unlike the freight companies that were prepared, they couldn't comply, unable to provide that additional data to CBP because they weren't getting it from China Post(not the way UGL vendors ship anyway).
So a pause was imposed until they complied. Less then 24 hours later they found a way to supply the required data to CBP and packs were allowed to flow. That's not "chaos", it's imposing consequences for failing to comply with the law, and it fixed that problem in one day. That's success, not a "circus".
But I can understand people who admire the efficiency of the DMV or believe the USPS is a great organization filled with customer service oriented employees could be disturbed by such quick action.
Just want to check if you have the "report" on USPS providing data to CBP.
What I understood is that Trump reinstated the De Minimus exemption for packages from China...
"Following President Trump’s removal of the de minimis exemption earlier this week, on Friday, February 7, 2025, President Trump issued an amendment to his original Executive Order and temporarily reinstated the exemption until “notification by the Secretary of Commerce to the President that adequate systems are in place to fully and expediently process and collect tariff revenue for all Chinese products.”
![]()
Customs Confirms Scope of China IEEPA Tariffs and Removes, Then Reinstates, De Minimis Exemption for Most Low-Value Entries
Following President Trump’s removal of the de minimis exemption earlier this week, on Friday, February 7, 2025, President Trump issued an amendment to hiswww.internationaltradeinsights.com
NOTE: This report also covers the EU responding to "De Minimus" type exemptions to their countries as well.
Trump tariffs: US Postal Service resumes deliveries from China
The company said it is working with customs after Donald Trump closed a tax loophole on low-value parcels.
Last edited:
