Dirthand
Member
I
D
If they are currently using bottletop filters as they say one option would be that yey brew a big batch of test c dumped it out to filter then with still oil in the big beaker started dumping oil and powder for the blend batch.. any which way tou look at it axle has a history of sloppy brewing.. some people don't seem to mind.whateverI don't quite see how this could be a problem with the raws. There's roughly as much primo and test E as the product is supposed to have, plus 36 mg/mL of foreign test C. It's an extra 15% API mass per mL vs. the product spec -- surely that would have shown up when weighing the raw powders. Assuming you weighed them individually, it would have shown as 25% or 37% extra mass for one of them. If it were a raw problem, I'd expect to see roughly 250 mg/mL concentration, but with a substantial portion of one of the intended APIs replaced with some testC.
And if the sample was taken from a correctly dosed vial, but somehow contaminated by mixing with testC-containing oil by the customer, then that contaminant should have diluted the primo/test solution, right? In which case the concentrations of primo and testE would be lower than the roughly 150 primo/100 testE concentrations shown on the Jano test.
This almost seems like you brewed up some test C at some odd concentration I'm too lazy to calculate, and then used it like it was pure oil for a batch of primo/testE mix.
I'm probably being stupid about this. I'm certainly ignorant of how these fine products are made.
D
