MESO "Specialized" Testing Group Fund

According to Grok 4 Andros-4-en-3-one, 17-(1-oxo-3-phenylpropoxy)-, (17.eta.)- is actually testosterone phenylpropionate.
 
According to Grok 4 Andros-4-en-3-one, 17-(1-oxo-3-phenylpropoxy)-, (17.eta.)- is actually testosterone phenylpropionate.
according to perplexity is NPP just a byproduct or small modification of it or degradation.

Can't really trust AI on these stuff to be honest
 
according to perplexity is NPP just a byproduct or small modification of it or degradation.

Can't really trust AI on these stuff to be honest
True, it is useful a lot but I take it with a grain of salt if it’s something I don’t really know about, was wondering what other people think about it.
 
according to perplexity is NPP just a byproduct or small modification of it or degradation.

Can't really trust AI on these stuff to be honest

That’s the information I’m getting from AI. It definitely has me wanting to send in a sample of the NPP I have that tested with a higher purity to see if it would have the same gcms make up. Or, if someone knows of a gcms that’s been done on a previous sample of NPP that would be helpful.
 
Basically has 28 % testosterone phenylpropionate what a joke I better get a refund for this garbage

Some guys and I are chatting behind the scenes and it looks like this actually may be normal and is part of NPPs makeup. But hell, don’t take that as gospel as we are all just asking AI.
 
Yeah, disregard it being part of its make up. When asked again…..

> The Findings:
>
> The sample contains two major components.
>
> Peak 1: At 20.982 minutes, a compound was identified as Nandrolone phenpropionate. The large "Area%" of 71.42 means it's the primary ingredient.
>
> Peak 2: At 21.156 minutes, a compound was identified as 17β-(3-phenylpropanoyl)-androst-4-en-3-one. This is a chemical name describing the structure of another anabolic steroid. It's a significant impurity or a second active ingredient.
>
> Significance: The results confirm the presence of specific, potent anabolic steroids. Nandrolone phenpropionate is a controlled substance used in medicine but often abused in athletics. The report quantifies its purity (71%) and identifies a major contaminant or co-ingredient.
 
Some guys and I are chatting behind the scenes and it looks like this actually may be normal and is part of NPPs makeup. But hell, don’t take that as gospel as we are all just asking AI.

its the name for npp but it has "andro" which is testosterone.

if it were npp it would be "estro" which is nandrolone. ive already asked jano for you but for now if its not a error its test p

 

its the name for npp but it has "andro" which is testosterone.

if it were npp it would be "estro" which is nandrolone. ive already asked jano for you but for now if its not a error its test p

TP should show up on HPLC tho
 
According to Grok 4 Andros-4-en-3-one, 17-(1-oxo-3-phenylpropoxy)-, (17.eta.)- is actually testosterone phenylpropionate.
It is lol, it's literally listed in the Pubchem page synonyms...


1759501292634.webp
 
View attachment 352284

my money is on both is npp and its a naming error. they look way too similar + same rt peak time

This sounds logical as I don’t believe I’ve heard of any recent TP raws being manufactured.

Hopefully Jano can clear this up. I know he’s mentioned in the past that he has often seen traces of other compounds in samples but doesn’t list them on the report as it’s a very small percentage, but in this case it shows to make up 28.5% of the analysis.
 
It is lol, it's literally listed in the Pubchem page synonyms...


View attachment 352286
You can't trust AutoID, the peaks are like almost identical between the two, so for me it looks more like NPP but fucked up
 
This sounds logical as I don’t believe I’ve heard of any recent TP raws being manufactured.

Hopefully Jano can clear this up. I know he’s mentioned in the past that he has often seen traces of other compounds in samples but doesn’t list them on the report as it’s a very small percentage, but in this case it shows to make up 28.5% of the analysis.

They were selling TP too I believe
 
@B Ware i may have the solution for us, what if you brew some NPP and send the oil to test ( meso fund will pay for it)
If it's NPP at 89% purity the product will be X but if it's 71% NPP and 19% TPP or whatever it is then it will be massively underdosed isn't it?

Maybe it's a stupid idea but it does make sense in my mind xD

I have NPP that tested very pure so I could send that as well to run a GCMS on it. I don't know of any GCMS NPP lab test already done.
 

so jano just confirmed its not testosterone.

i am giving up maybe that new chemist guy can help us xd. my brain says its just gonna be like npp - 2 da but i just woke up and im too tired for this so essentially same steroid core as npp so it'll behave similar. but again big lab QC issue
 
Last edited:

Sponsors

Latest posts

Back
Top