Wuhan Wansheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (USA, International)

Thanks for keeping us updated. I’ve got 4 silver kits delivered at the same time period.

So they were originally willing to do the right thing when the poor test results were going to be swept under the rug but now it’s public and it’s a no go? Lol

I read it as they were going to do the right thing, then changed their mind so the results went public
 
It means it was delivered to the post office warehouse in germany lol, don't worry. You will have it within 2-3 days.
Just as I was reading your reply, I got a DHL app notification saying the package will be delivered on January 3rd, lol. Thanks a lot for the kind and reassuring explanation.
 
Don’t waste your money on oral peps
I’ve heard the issue with Slu pp is the low dosage of 1 mg for humans doesn’t correlate with the studies, and should be in the magnitudes of 50/100mgs?
Contrary to what the yt chiropractor says, there are several peptides with decent oral bioavailability/efficacy, SLU-PP-332 being one of them.
I think it’s still like 50% right? But the injectable form seems sketchy having to use DMSO as well when reconstituting
 
WWB Black Friday Sale 2025
* Event start date: 11/24st *

Please contact the WWB sales rep to obtain an updated price list for shipments from the China warehouse

Telegram:@Cavan221
Whatsapp:+1 (840) 220 7435(Cavan)
Whatsapp:+1 (912) 996 6694(Gary)
Whatsapp:+1 (912) 577 6269(Harlan)
Whatsapp:+1 (912) 419 0244(Angel)
Whatsapp:+44 7928 317187(Daisy)

Summary
Some products are 5-15% off compared to before the promotion.

✅ Guarantees
✔️ Mass Guarantee
✔️ Reshipment Policy(USA and Europe only)

SHIPPING
* Free on orders $1000+(Only before 11/28)

Tracking number updated within 3-4 business days after payment verification.

WWB Team
Here you are . Numbers
 
I’ve heard the issue with Slu pp is the low dosage of 1 mg for humans doesn’t correlate with the studies, and should be in the magnitudes of 50/100mgs?

I think it’s still like 50% right? But the injectable form seems sketchy having to use DMSO as well when reconstituting
Oral bioavailability of SLU was ~45% according to what I read somewhere. There has been much discussion about human equivalent doses when compared to the studies, but my personal opinion is that it has notable benefits at doses far below what would be equivalent.

As Photon said, don't inject DMSO. Not sure where you read that, but that's terrible advice. A transdermal may be possible using crushed tabs and DMSO, perhaps that's what you saw recommended?
 
Oral bioavailability of SLU was ~45% according to what I read somewhere. There has been much discussion about human equivalent doses when compared to the studies, but my personal opinion is that it has notable benefits at doses far below what would be equivalent.

As Photon said, don't inject DMSO. Not sure where you read that, but that's terrible advice. A transdermal may be possible using crushed tabs and DMSO, perhaps that's what you saw recommended?
Got a source for that claim? It has never been used orally in any study.

Didn't do anything for me at 500mg a day (not mcg) and that batch from SSA was tested multiple times by different people. Didn't feel a thing or see any effects.

Did a quick search on it and all I could find was:
The same research group reports an orally active follow on compound, SLU PP 915, and the abstract snippet explicitly contrasts it with SLU PP 332, which “lacks oral bioavailability.”

The SLU-PP-915 authors are interpreting the literature and their own work to say SLU-PP-332 does not have sufficient oral bioavailability for practical use as an oral drug in vivo, which is why they moved chemistry to a new analog that does.


A university write up on the compound explicitly frames a key “next step” as refining it into a pill instead of an injection, which is consistent with “not orally workable as is.”


Bottom line: in the scientific literature, SLU-PP-332 hasn’t been shown to be orally bioavailable in a way that delivers meaningful blood levels or efficacy by mouth. SLU-PP-915 was developed because SLU-PP-332 lacked that property.


In other words, as I suspected, anyone that claims this drug does anything when they use it orally is full of shit. The research group that developed both compounds states that SLU-PP-332 lacks oral bioavailability. That paper was published THIS MONTH.
 
Last edited:
I’ve heard the issue with Slu pp is the low dosage of 1 mg for humans doesn’t correlate with the studies, and should be in the magnitudes of 50/100mgs?

I think it’s still like 50% right? But the injectable form seems sketchy having to use DMSO as well when reconstituting
Just grab some oral SLU-PP-915 and you'll be good to go.
 
OK results are now publicly available

Vial kit A.
Bought from GB
Tested at 12.50mg, 94.734% purity, 0.854% dimer
Stored in freezer.
Bought in October


View attachment 370470
Vial kit B.
Bought from GB
Tested at 8.85mg, 75.174% purity, 0.409% dimer
Stored in fridge.
Bought in October. Received in November

View attachment 370484

View attachment 370476

View attachment 370477
View attachment 370478
Shit. October is when I bought. It arrived early November. Both of these are probably from the same batch since both were purchased in October.

Now wondering if I should take it. Don't want immunogenicity to hgh. I bought 8 kits. Argh! I have a planned blood test here in 3 weeks, maybe I will take and test thru blood. However, it could be sketchy vials scattered through out so even testing with blood won't mean a lot.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top