Right?
Well actually, maybe but maybe not! (I will admit for the more seasoned vet these conflicts or differing opinions pose minimal challenges because their personal contacts, FRIENDS, MATES, enable and expedite the purchase of AAS while minimizing the risk in many respects)
Why, because often there are just as many negative reviews for a pathetic product as positive ones. How can this be? Paid ratings, rankings and reviews are all to common is this business and for neophytes in search of a legitimate source, whom are they to believe?
No doubt a well doctored, managed and advertised product site with bogus "community boards", frequently overcome with artificial mates and bro's has an undeniable appeal to noobs (not knowing the difference).
How is this quandary best overcome? Uncensored boards especially with respect to PED sites; sales, efficacy, veracity, reliability etc. No, this approach is not perfect but it's a drastic improvement over those arcane site serving "rules", which favor moderators whom are invariably on someone's payroll and whom enforce the "rules" in an indiscriminate fashion, favoring only themselves or site sponsors.
For example of how this works effectively, pull up the thread "steroidsfax.com" whereupon a query involving the resale of "unlabeled Sciroxx products" was raised on Meso's OPEN FORUM board. The end result after several contentious recriminations was a satisfied noob and a AAS site whom developed a more trusting relationship with Meso membership. (Admittedly, in my experience, most AAS resale sites are unwilling to subject "their company" to the degree of scrutiny which is trite to many uncensored boards)
Many "open" AAS boards would simply "not tolerate" such revealing discussions because of the vested interest of all those involved, excluding the isolated customer. Why the "rules" don't allow the disclosure of secure, sensitive, privileged or "copyrighted" information, lol!
JIM
Well actually, maybe but maybe not! (I will admit for the more seasoned vet these conflicts or differing opinions pose minimal challenges because their personal contacts, FRIENDS, MATES, enable and expedite the purchase of AAS while minimizing the risk in many respects)
Why, because often there are just as many negative reviews for a pathetic product as positive ones. How can this be? Paid ratings, rankings and reviews are all to common is this business and for neophytes in search of a legitimate source, whom are they to believe?
No doubt a well doctored, managed and advertised product site with bogus "community boards", frequently overcome with artificial mates and bro's has an undeniable appeal to noobs (not knowing the difference).
How is this quandary best overcome? Uncensored boards especially with respect to PED sites; sales, efficacy, veracity, reliability etc. No, this approach is not perfect but it's a drastic improvement over those arcane site serving "rules", which favor moderators whom are invariably on someone's payroll and whom enforce the "rules" in an indiscriminate fashion, favoring only themselves or site sponsors.
For example of how this works effectively, pull up the thread "steroidsfax.com" whereupon a query involving the resale of "unlabeled Sciroxx products" was raised on Meso's OPEN FORUM board. The end result after several contentious recriminations was a satisfied noob and a AAS site whom developed a more trusting relationship with Meso membership. (Admittedly, in my experience, most AAS resale sites are unwilling to subject "their company" to the degree of scrutiny which is trite to many uncensored boards)
Many "open" AAS boards would simply "not tolerate" such revealing discussions because of the vested interest of all those involved, excluding the isolated customer. Why the "rules" don't allow the disclosure of secure, sensitive, privileged or "copyrighted" information, lol!
JIM
)]
