Search results for query: Plausible deniability

You’re fine. Either the package will be returned to sender if they used a real address or it will be stuck in purgatory and eventually destroyed. Either way, you never accepted the package and have plausible deniability.

...manufacturers, Lupin seems to be by far the largest and most "legit". They have a Wikipedia page and billions in revenue. The other companies kinda seem like their business might primarily be exporting HCG to AAS users. UGLs that pay taxes and have a layer of plausible deniability, basically.

Is that the result you're looking for, "invalid?"

I think the majority of dudes are more so worried about the meta data being directly linked to them. Plausible deniability is easier if if they just a have package but no way other way to link someone to buying the stuff they bought. I am just speculating here..

You should watch Edward Snowden's documentary and read his book. It touches on metadata and how it's being collected, shared, and processed. I think a few steriod users data is probably the very last thing the federal government is looking for. I'm not saying be the low hanging fruit. But...

I wear latex gloves when I mail jano samples. I'd encourage others to do the same when they mail ANYONE anything

Can't speak for others but this is absolutely the case for me. If the government can't prove you ordered the package then they can't prove that someone else wasn't trying to get you busted, and a good lawyer can get the charges dropped or at least win at trial. Having your name and address in...

Ok rybfor that. I was thining of going to po and telling then the track number and send it me lol. But if its reshipped from same shipper i shoukd still be ok(?) Tia

...knowledge on DNMs to never look up tracking, so it surprised me when I saw that people on AAS forums were always so eager to get theirs. This destroys any and all plausible deniability. But of course with steroids there is less risk. As many pointed out, informed delivery is as far as it...

why not just do the reship option then?

...where he says that oatmeal and fruit are the key to his physique….like, come on bro. It’s 2024 and you’re too big to have plausible deniability like some former hollywood actors. So I’m glad he’s at least being semi-honest here, that’s cool to me. I understand in that line of work there has...

Thanks, I’m gonna place my order when Tracy gets back. I probably won’t sign if they do end up asking, and chalk it up to losses, consequence of me not planning ahead. It’s a small chance anything bad would ever happen, but I’d rather maintain plausible deniability.

His communication approach was fascinating. Must have worked with a PR team. Approach 1. I built all this naturally in season 1 but I ran myself ragged, injured myself, and developed "a huge imbalance in hormones". 2. For season 2 I had to do this recovery supplement called Testosterone to...

Thank you, sir, this means so much to us!

...my sincerest wishes for success in your current and future endeavors. Your adeptness at navigating complex scenarios with plausible deniability is indeed commendable. It brings to mind the challenges faced by San Rafael Chemical Services, which, over two decades, struggled with similar...

Ahh, gotcha. I feel kind of dumb now.

All I sent was a sample of “perfume”. plausible deniability, nothing is linked to me so I’m not worried.

Importing steroids by mail=plausible deniability and no consequences. Driving them across = importing controlled substance, and possession of controlled substance and jail

...USA border patrol open package see large bag of powder and viles, "Welp doesn't say what it is better let it pass" lol. its actually worse to have to get in writing after u receive it is for plausible deniability. But I guess allows them to prevent people from saying never got the package.

They test it, but they don’t do a Janos style HPLC. In most cases they dip a multi drug test panel stick in it and if it doesn’t come back as coke or fentanyl or something they shrug and say, “Ok.”

...here and delete all browser history. Millard may want to delete ur account if associated with an email u have on ur phone.. no plausible deniability if they take ur comp and see u asked about YOUR package YOU ordered. that being said we are all waiting with baited breath how it works out...

...you and then say oh well it was shipped to me by mistake and I just held onto them lol... 9/10ths and all that. you don't have plausible deniability when have packages over the years come to you but with different names. reason when get a reship they want to send to a different addy...

Think about this from a custom officers point of view. Which will you let through if you're tired already after a long day's work; vials clearly marked with its contents or some unknown oily liquid with number 1,2,3,4 on it. They know what it is but the hassle to identify it especially in low...

In the US the United States Postal Service has postal inspectors that have law enforcement authority. Any crime committed through the mail they have jurisdiction over that case. They are actually a pretty powerful entity here.

A trt clinic selling EQ is number one bullshit. Like, OP will have plausible deniability, but this clinic is begging for trouble doing things like this, specially because i can't imagine a single therapeutic use for boldenone in humans.