24k Pharma US Domestic Source

[OdieM]

Oh how Meso has changed. This guy doesn't need bussiness tips trust me. He is very educated in the matter. All this "taking breaks" and now saying he might have to take it down a notch on only sell to a select few is one of the best things he could of done for bussiness. I bet since this morning he's received more orders then ever. Everyone's rushing to make the cut.

Like WPus said, if he goes private then there's no way to hold him accountable for any wrong doings. Also like mentioned if he says that he will only deal with previous clients then there will be one hell of a shit storm cause that means he has all yalls info stored. Not sure if y'all saw that bust I posted yesterday but that source had 40,000 pages worth of evidence, meaning lots of members are fucked. I wouldn't sweat this guy. If he goes private then let him and take your business else where.

 

[bickel29]

Going private only removes a ton of accountability for 24K. People don't discuss private sources the way they do public, doesn't end well for us oftentimes.

You can limit the volume by only producing X amount of each product per month/week/whatever. When it's gone, it's gone... Until the next batch.

WP - I don't think that this scenario is the same as other private sources that don't get discussed though.

There is no reason why customers can't come back on this thread just as often as they do now, to discuss whatever they want to (including the stuff they discuss now). I don't think 24 would threaten not to serve them for posting their experiences.

 

[Ryno1980]

Ive heard several people mention no new customers... Heres the problem with that.. unless you are keeping records of emails, there is no way to know if someone is a new customer or an old one... Reality is if you are erasing records as you say you are then every time you get an order from say.. me.. you should be under the impression that I am a new customer.. .. My thought is that it sounds like shipping is your concern.. if that is the case, then why not make it a 7-10 day delivery process instead of a 3-4 day .. I know this sucks for the guy waiting on the other end but if you had the option to ship a certain amount of packages per day vs having to get 50 orders out the door immediately then wouldn't that solve your problem? Based on what you have said, its not a volume of orders problem its the volume of shipping you are having to deal with on a daily or weekly basis??

 

[24kpharma]

Afternoon all, I appreciate all of the feedback.

I have received some concern about going "private" in regards to "getting in" or being on a list of customers that will be able to order. This should not be a concern. As some have stated, the only way to implement a "no new customers" policy is to keep some type of customer record. This is not something we do or are going to do. In the past some customers have asked to keep them updated with status of items. This is why I created an auto-rely with our stocklist - so customers can check at any time.

Beyond the issue of keeping customer data, another reason I am again going "private" is that I would like to be available to all. I believe that every person started with a source somewhere. I can understand how frustrating it would wanting to start AAS but unable to find a source. Yes, profit drives this business, but I do find satisfaction in fulfilling customer orders and helping them in their AAS needs.

Another suggestion some have mentioned is limiting orders, shipping days, stock, etc. My concern with this is that it may create disproportional ordering. In which there is a blast of orders initially and then a drastic slowdown. I do not believe is this an efficient use of our resources.

Another suggestion is to increase T/A time. We try to have our orders out in a timely fashion, not only because it reduces anxiety and increases customer satisfaction, but also because it helps us stay on top of orders. It can get very confusing when there are multiple pending orders and they begin to stack up due to delayed shipping.

Finally, there is the suggestion of increasing the minimum. I believe this is the best course of action at this time. We will begin implementing this on Friday and simply trial it. If there's a lot of push back, we can revisit this policy. This way, we can continue doing what we are doing but hopefully have a reduction in the number of packages we are shipping. Again, it is less about our ability to process orders, but more about the volume that is being shipped.

 

[Ryno1980]

Afternoon all, I appreciate all of the feedback.

I have received some concern about going "private" in regards to "getting in" or being on a list of customers that will be able to order. This should not be a concern. As some have stated, the only way to implement a "no new customers" policy is to keep some type of customer record. This is not something we do or are going to do. In the past some customers have asked to keep them updated with status of items. This is why I created an auto-rely with our stocklist - so customers can check at any time.

Beyond the issue of keeping customer data, another reason I am again going "private" is that I would like to be available to all. I believe that every person started with a source somewhere. I can understand how frustrating it would wanting to start AAS but unable to find a source. Yes, profit drives this business, but I do find satisfaction in fulfilling customer orders and helping them in their AAS needs.

Another suggestion some have mentioned is limiting orders, shipping days, stock, etc. My concern with this is that it may create disproportional ordering. In which there is a blast of orders initially and then a drastic slowdown. I do not believe is this an efficient use of our resources.

Another suggestion is to increase T/A time. We try to have our orders out in a timely fashion, not only because it reduces anxiety and increases customer satisfaction, but also because it helps us stay on top of orders. It can get very confusing when there are multiple pending orders and they begin to stack up due to delayed shipping.

Finally, there is the suggestion of increasing the minimum. I believe this is the best course of action at this time. We will begin implementing this on Friday and simply trial it. If there's a lot of push back, we can revisit this policy. This way, we can continue doing what we are doing but hopefully have a reduction in the number of packages we are shipping. Again, it is less about our ability to process orders, but more about the volume that is being shipped.

ok so what is the new minimum?

 

[DedLift]

1 million dollars. You in?

 

[24kpharma]

ok so what is the new minimum?

It will be reflected on our autolist in the next few days, it will not be a significant increase.

 

[Cpt999]

No he's not..



One less customer..You're welcome!

TROLLOLOLOL HAHAHA

 

[Ryno1980]

1 million dollars. You in?

I'm always in bud....

 

[jackthegripper2]

How u guys liking his new stuff in the new carrier oil? Test c preferably? I felt like the older vials seemed a lot more potent. Could be all in my head. Gonna get some labs ran in The next few weeks. Going private.... Quit tripping guys there's MAD sources out there with comparible product who would love to take your money. His caber is listed as Pfizer hence the outrageous markup I got the bottle with caber pills and it some off brand!

 

[rigs03]

This thread has become so bizarre.

WP - I don't think that this scenario is the same as other private sources that don't get discussed though.

There is no reason why customers can't come back on this thread just as often as they do now, to discuss whatever they want to (including the stuff they discuss now). I don't think 24 would threaten not to serve them for posting their experiences.

This is what I was thinking. Private in this case doesn't equal no one talking about it, it just means no new customers. Meso will always be an uncensored forum, so there is simply no stopping discussing a source here whether good or bad.

 

[bickel29]

His caber is listed as Pfizer hence the outrageous markup I got the bottle with caber pills and it some off brand!

When you say "some off brand" do you mean it's a generic pharmaceutical brand, a different pharmaceutical name brand, or a ugl brand?

Thanks in advance.

 

[ECB]

When you say "some off brand" do you mean it's a generic pharmaceutical brand, a different pharmaceutical name brand, or a ugl brand?

Thanks in advance.

If I had to guess, I'd wager this guy doesn't realize Pharmacia & Upjohn = Pfizer.

 

[Toodamnkool]

you guys are hilarious . I just placed an order with 24k

 

[Nutpuncher]

@24kpharma and 24k's customers,

I have a suggestion which may not be a good one, but here it goes.

(a) Go private
(b) Once you determine who is a member, give each member a unique code. As a member ,we are to keep that code private and secure. When ever we place an order, we must provide you with code and then once you confirm code is valid, you provide a different code which we will use on next order. So all your keeping is a bunch of nonsense codes that don't related to anybody.

This is only a suggestion.... If this sounds like a decent idea, maybe you or other members can expand on my idea as this I am brainstorming.

 

[ROB581211]

@24kpharma and 24k's customers,

I have a suggestion which may not be a good one, but here it goes.

(a) Go private
(b) Once you determine who is a member, give each member a unique code. As a member ,we are to keep that code private and secure. When ever we place an order, we must provide you with code and then once you confirm code is valid, you provide a different code which we will use on next order. So all your keeping is a bunch of nonsense codes that don't related to anybody.

This is only a suggestion.... If this sounds like a decent idea, maybe you or other members can expand on my idea as this I am brainstorming.

Simple solution retain board handles. That way no personal info is held. You give him your board handle on the order and verified. Nobody's board handle should be traceable anyway.

 

[Nutpuncher]

Simple solution retain board handles. That way no personal info is held. You give him your board handle on the order and verified. Nobody's board handle should be traceable anyway.

But that requires you to join a board. And someone could use my username and pretend to be me, provided that I make the cut to become a member. But that person would have to know who is a member and who isn't.

 

[ROB581211]

I'm sure nothing would be fail proof.

 

[Nutpuncher]

I'm sure nothing would be fail proof.

You are correct....lets say 24k does adopt my proposal and his hard drive crashes.... 24k would have to kept the codes on an external drive and/or use online storage such as google docs which is safe because all it is a bunch of nonsense alpha numeric characters.

 

[ROB581211]

You are correct....lets say 24k does adopt my proposal and his hard drive crashes.... 24k would have to kept the codes on an external drive and/or use online storage such as google docs which is safe because all it is a bunch of nonsense alpha numeric characters.

But at the same time that doesn't do him any good because you have the capability of passing your code to anyone you see fit. Everything has its downfalls

I don't really care as I have never pulled the trigger with him. I've considered it but yet to do so.