Haunch
New Member
Same with the good EQ vet Shit works great
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
24k Pharma US Domestic Source
- Thread starter 24kpharma
- Start date
The Tone
New Member
I ordered some of the Tren E . have not received it yet but certainly will give you guys an update on results
jeetsun
New Member
How long you been on the pharmacom eq? I just started running 24ks' Eq.
jeetsun
New Member
I've pinned 24ks tren ace 2 days now and have had no pip at all.
I've been on pharmacom test e and eq for going on two weeks now. I just got spooked with the couple bad bloods that surfaced. Now I'm just gonna run it a few more weeks get bloods as planned and see
I saw some good bloods on 24s test cyp so I'm just checking it out over here 
I really want to pull the trigger on a few vials of 24ks tren ace...
Who doesn't? I'm currently on pharmacon Ace and only at 75mg ed do I really feel it, hoping 24k's ace would be legit and not underdosed like most sources out there
Are you feeling anything from theppharmacom
It's been two days since I bumped my dose up to 100mg/Ed and this morning I woke up pretty sweaty... Honestly, this is my first time running Tren and I'm very underwhelmed. I expected much more, I don't know if it's due to it being underdosed or me having a low affinity for sides
Hey, I appreciate the discussion that's going on right now. I just wanted to mention that it is highly possible that other UGLs and myself have access to the same quality raws coming from China.
I have read in several posts why sources don't heavily overdose to help account for purity. I wanted to point out that I do overdose, but there is a limit on how high I can overdose it by before having to reduce the advertise labeling. For example, for one of the batches of Test Cyp, it was overdosed too high and as a result it was constantly crashing. While more experienced users were able to easily overcome this, I had a lot of concern and explaining to newer users. With the Tren A and recent Test P, I had the same issue. I could not dose them higher than 110-120mg/mL, if I tried to dose at 150mg/mL it would crash. I would need to use a stronger solvent (EO), more BB, and more BA, which could agitate some users in regards to PIP. I also try to balance the advertised dosing too, because if I labeled Test E at 100mg/mL, for example, customers would have to inject many mLs of product a week. Hopefully this helps explain and give some insight why it's not a simple fix as "adding more powders to the solution".
That being said, I once again have to reiterate: please have reasonable expectations. I am happy to work with dissatisfied customers, but it is very difficult to satisfy customers who seek me perhaps as a solution to bad UGL products, be Tren or Test, etc. I am not trying to create loopholes for me to be able to escape scrutiny, but I am simply asking customers to view me as another UGL, and nothing more. I promise I am not underdosing, but that is of little use if the raws I am receiving are of low quality. This is why feedback is great for me to help weed out and help QA, because without analytical equipment, it is neigh impossible for me to do it all myself.
Thanks for reading.
I have read in several posts why sources don't heavily overdose to help account for purity. I wanted to point out that I do overdose, but there is a limit on how high I can overdose it by before having to reduce the advertise labeling. For example, for one of the batches of Test Cyp, it was overdosed too high and as a result it was constantly crashing. While more experienced users were able to easily overcome this, I had a lot of concern and explaining to newer users. With the Tren A and recent Test P, I had the same issue. I could not dose them higher than 110-120mg/mL, if I tried to dose at 150mg/mL it would crash. I would need to use a stronger solvent (EO), more BB, and more BA, which could agitate some users in regards to PIP. I also try to balance the advertised dosing too, because if I labeled Test E at 100mg/mL, for example, customers would have to inject many mLs of product a week. Hopefully this helps explain and give some insight why it's not a simple fix as "adding more powders to the solution".
That being said, I once again have to reiterate: please have reasonable expectations. I am happy to work with dissatisfied customers, but it is very difficult to satisfy customers who seek me perhaps as a solution to bad UGL products, be Tren or Test, etc. I am not trying to create loopholes for me to be able to escape scrutiny, but I am simply asking customers to view me as another UGL, and nothing more. I promise I am not underdosing, but that is of little use if the raws I am receiving are of low quality. This is why feedback is great for me to help weed out and help QA, because without analytical equipment, it is neigh impossible for me to do it all myself.
Thanks for reading.
Thank you for your honesty, 24k. I have more respect for individuals who are upfront about their products rather than claiming an absurd and impossible 99% purity. I'll give you feedback on your Tren when I receive it, expect an order to be placed tomorrow
I appreciate your feedback.
I also wanted to brief mention pricing because I know many experienced customers are aware of the mark up on product. I hope to provide and maintain competitive and affordable pricing, but at the same time I do have a lot of overhead for the safety of myself and in turn the customers. For example, here are a few examples of policies/processes that increase the cost of overhead: paying different receivers throughout the nation to receive packages, paying receivers in multiple states to pick up MG, paying and reshipping to shippers in multiple states, paying multiple individuals to send WU/MG/Wire transfer to suppliers in China, paying receivers in multiple states for purchase of brewing supplies (caps, vials, filters, etc), refunding customers, sending reships, time it takes to run an "underground" payroll, time and % lost from Bitcoin converted into cash. These are just a few examples, it might be slightly elaborate but to keep ourselves safe and our customers safe, I think safety is priceless.
But end of the day I still do make a profit, I am still a business and it only makes sense to stay in business if there is a benefit to said business. Again, this is me trying to be as transparent as possible with customers and the community. I can be generous and work with individuals, but I have no intentions or motivations to be a charity. After safety, customer satisfaction and profit are drivers. Make no qualms, I am here for your business and your money. I have no malicious intents, but do understand that businesses exist for profit.
As always, I appreciate all readers and contributors.
Mofotyler
New Member
anyone got any blood work done yet from here?
tacevedo
New Member
Can't you read? Every single thread you ask the same fucking question, you have asked this question for at least 4 diff. Sources i might be even missing a few, is it that hard to go back and read a few pages or even check the lab testing section?
xgunx
Well-known Member
No bloodwork is inconclusive so its not used here
Mofotyler
New Member
you are right I should just not ask when I don't see it. Just because one doesn't see it doesn't mean its not there. may have just missed it. would not be the first person to miss it.
Ravensnation
New Member
I pulled the trigger on some test P&E.Waiting to see how that goes because I really want that Tren A too.Finding it at a decent quality has become difficult as of late.If you get it good there is nothing like it..Fingers crossed..
I know it's not easy, but if you want to use this forum, it takes a lot of reading. You'll find a link to some bloodwork a couple of pages back. In the future, don't troll for answers
