80mg of anavar a day...

[JoblessPhilosopher]

I'm curious, what would happen if you would take 80mg of anavar per day for 30 days? Someone recommended that in the Military Cycle thread and I was wondering what would happen. That'd be 560mg of an AAS per week. Has anyone tried it? Granted, I realize that test is always regarded as the basis and is cheaper, but if you took the cost issue out of it, would it be worth trying?

 

[borderbound]

sounds like a really expensive way to gain 6 pounds of LBM

 

[Hypertrophiac]

you'd probably tear a muscle when working out

 

[phatboy1]

my only question is why? dude var seems to work better for me at 10 -12 weeks at 30-40mg ed. you dont need that much. fuck just take 30mg of dbol. youll gain more size and have enough money to pay ur rent this month. 4 weeks is too short of a cycle that consist of anavar only imo
if you do use the var dont take that much man. what youll gain aint worth the stress on the liver. take 40mg for eight weeks or 30mg for 10-12 weeks.

 

[Mr Kent]

It'd probably give you some descent definition and hardness,provided your diet is right.Don't expect to gain much of mass.Sounds like a summer cycle....But I'd go longer than four weeks....

 

[jdemon519]

If somebody gave it to me for free? sure! otherwise, like somebody else here said...I got rent to pay

 

[jocko]

id say cut the dose in half and run the cycle double as long. I am doing 40mg for 10 weeks and loving it

 

[adjutant]

Shit man, cut that dose in half or thirds even, and lengthen your cycle

 

[hyelifter]

Just curious,
What's harder on the liver?
Dosages: Anavar 50mg for 3weeks or Anavar 25mg for six weeks?
BTW, I am not advocating an all oral only cycle. They arent worth the risk to benefit ratio.

 

[iamdwalrus]

I'm never disappointed when using 100mg/day of var.

 

[phatboy1]

Just curious,
What's harder on the liver?
Dosages: Anavar 50mg for 3weeks or Anavar 25mg for six weeks?
BTW, I am not advocating an all oral only cycle. They arent worth the risk to benefit ratio.

dude your anavar fOR 3 weeks isnt even a cycle imo. youll just be feeling it around week 2 or 3. theres no way anyone can answer your question about which will be harder on the liver.

 

[PUMPED]

i was they one recommending 50-80mgs of anavar...becuase it works good for myself and many other bros at this dosage...also because the possibilty that the liquid anavar might be slightly underdosed becuase the powder is so expensive and there are always some UG labs are looking to cut corners...with that in mind and how the kid wanted to gain some strength and not have noticable gains...50-80 mgs is a good choice

 

[biganth]

I did 10 weeks of Anavar @ 100mg per day with 1000mg Primo per week for 10 weeks.One of the best cycles ive ever done!

 

[ydrpysg]

I did 10 weeks of Anavar @ 100mg per day with 1000mg Primo per week for 10 weeks.One of the best cycles ive ever done!

damn bro -- that must have cost a fortune. i'd love to try about half that dose for 10 weeks. but even that would be ferociously expensive.

i'm currently running var at 50mg/day and am very pleased with the results btw.

 

[hyelifter]

dude your anavar fOR 3 weeks isnt even a cycle imo. youll just be feeling it around week 2 or 3. theres no way anyone can answer your question about which will be harder on the liver.

The question wasn't about the effectiveness of the cycle. I know 3 weeks aint nothin and an all oral cycle is crap. The question is about the effects on the liver if one was to use orals for 3weeks in a high dosage, or extend the the length of time on with a lower dosage while on a REAL CYCLE. Which in your opinion or experience is safer or better.
Iam sure there has been some research done to know what going on inside the liver. Thanks all and Phatboy for the original response.
Hyelifter

 

[iamdwalrus]

I did 10 weeks of Anavar @ 100mg per day with 1000mg Primo per week for 10 weeks.One of the best cycles ive ever done!

How was your scalp after a gram of primo? Mine started to fall out with 600mg/wk and finasteride wasn't effective.

 

[phatboy1]

The question wasn't about the effectiveness of the cycle. I know 3 weeks aint nothin and an all oral cycle is crap. The question is about the effects on the liver if one was to use orals for 3weeks in a high dosage, or extend the the length of time on with a lower dosage while on a REAL CYCLE. Which in your opinion or experience is safer or better.
Iam sure there has been some research done to know what going on inside the liver. Thanks all and Phatboy for the original response.
Hyelifter

oh i gotcha bro. im sorry but i dont know the answer to your question. but i dont feel like a var only cycle is such a bad thing. its just so much better with test. shit everything seems to work better with test for me.
i did a var only cycle (30mgs for 10 weeks) and 75mcg of t-3 last summer and i actually liked what it did (spared some muscle and kept my strength up).
good luck

 

[iamdwalrus]

damn bro -- that must have cost a fortune. i'd love to try about half that dose for 10 weeks. but even that would be ferociously expensive.

i'm currently running var at 50mg/day and am very pleased with the results btw.

I got in on one of Liquid's Var sale and bought 6 bottles so I had enough and then some.

 

[Musclez]

I would say that the heavier dose for shorter period would be harsher on the liver. This is because the lower dose longer cycle has the bad effects spread out over a longer period of time, so the liver can handle it better. It's like having one beer a day, or a glass of wine, your liver is fine with that. But occasionally binge drinking has been shown to be harsher on the liver.

Hope this helps.

The question wasn't about the effectiveness of the cycle. I know 3 weeks aint nothin and an all oral cycle is crap. The question is about the effects on the liver if one was to use orals for 3weeks in a high dosage, or extend the the length of time on with a lower dosage while on a REAL CYCLE. Which in your opinion or experience is safer or better.
Iam sure there has been some research done to know what going on inside the liver. Thanks all and Phatboy for the original response.
Hyelifter

 

[Musclez]

Food Chem Toxicol. 2003 Nov;41(11):1551-9.
Effect of acute and chronic moderate alcohol consumption on fasted and postprandial lipemia in the rat.

Daher CF, Berberi RN, Baroody GM.

School of Arts and Sciences, Natural Sciences Division, Biology Department, Lebanese American University, PO Box 36, Byblos, Lebanon.

Effects of acute and chronic alcohol intake on fasted and postprandial lipemia in the rat model are reported. In the acute study, fasted rats are loaded with a 30% w/w olive oil emulsion with or without 8% alcohol in the form of ethanol, beer or whisky. After 3 h, either mesenteric lymph or blood is collected and the TAG-rich lipoprotein fractions are isolated. In the chronic study, animals received, for a period of 10 weeks, 3% alcohol in drinking water in the form of ethanol, beer or whisky. Blood samples were collected from animals in either the fasted state or after being loaded with the fat load as described above. Alcohol ingestion along with a fat load increases the number (increased net apoB48 secretion) and reduces the size (reduced TAG/apoB48 ratio) of CM secreted into the mesenteric lymph duct. It also delays gastric emptying, reduces trans-enterocyte TAG flux rates and increases plasma concentrations of TAG, cholesterol and CM. Similar conditions also results in increased total phospholipid and cholesterol content of CM but not of VLDL, indicating an enhanced liver bile secretion into the gut; however, a significant increase in plasma VLDL concentration is observed. Unlike the acute study, an alcohol-fat load in animals put on chronic alcohol intake results in increased HDL cholesterol concentrations and less pronounced postprandial hypertriglyceridemia and hypercholesterolemia but not hyperchylomicronemia. In the fasted state, plasma TAG and total apoB concentrations are not modified in these animals, and an increase in HDL and a decrease in total and LDL cholesterol concentrations are observed. No liver function impairment is observed following the 10-week period of chronic alcohol intake. In conclusion, unlike binge drinking, chronic moderate alcohol consumption appears to have a cardioprotective effect in the fasted state, an effect attenuated by the observed temporary postprandial hyperchylomicronemia and hypertriglyceridemia resulting from a direct effect of alcohol on CM size and number.