ALERT!! Source Neogene Biosicence (rHGH and peptides)

HMAV

New Member
(I already made a post in the source’s own thread, but it might go unnoticed by other community users.) I opened this post to reach more users.
I also ask that, as a community and potential buyers, if possible you visit the source’s thread and share your genuine opinion on what you would expect from a serious source if you were in my situation. Whether I am wrong or if the source is at fault. The source believes they are acting correctly just because the order was delivered. They don’t care if it was delivered to the right person or not, even though I have already proven with facts that it was not delivered to me (the name of the person who supposedly received it does not match mine, and the delivery address recorded at the time of delivery also does not match my address).

Copy of what I posted in the source’s thread:

*ALERT Source avoids responsibility!*
For those who already know me here on the forum, you are aware of my concern about sources for the community. This time it happened to me. I ordered a pack of retatrutide from this source on 19/11/2025. Payment was made, everything was fine. It was shipped after 3 business days, all good. The problems started with the delivery. I was tracking the delivery and noticed that the package was marked as delivered to someone named "FLOR." Flor is a female name in Portugal. I checked the street where the delivery was registered, and it was not mine. Immediately, I informed the source on Telegram and explained that it was marked as delivered but not to me, rather to someone named Flor. I called DPD, and the information I received was that the sender had to contact them since they are the main client of DPD. I asked the source to urgently call them so the error could be detected in time. Today, 7 days have passed since the delivery, and the source on Telegram is starting to blame me! It's surreal. I was accused of trying to scam the source (even though I made sure to send the DPD tracking, which clearly says: "Received by Flor," and it also shows the street where it was delivered, which DOES NOT match mine). I was accused of signing as Flor (a 95kg bearded man signing as Flor=Flower would be the most normal thing in the world), and the source just wants me to place another order to compensate for the mistake. Obviously, since I don’t need more products and have no responsibility for what happened, I did not accept. I just want to receive what I paid for. At this moment, I am without money and without the product, waiting for a resolution that is either a reshipment of the product or a refund, something the source refuses to do. I will update here in posts as things progress. I didn’t want to attach photos of the Telegram conversation for principles' sake because, even after being fully accused of everything without any proof (and if the source denies it, I will attach the Telegram conversation), I still think it’s wrong to expose personal conversations unless strictly necessary. I am waiting for a resolution, and after 7 days of insisting, posting here is my only option.

For now, I will attach only the part with the source’s brilliant suggestion.



TDLR: DPD delivered to the wrong person (“Flor” = Female name in my country) and at the wrong address (When the courier makes the delivery, the location where it was delivered is recorded, and it does not match my address.). Seller refuses to take responsibility, accuses me of scamming, and won’t refund or reship. Seven days later, I’m left with no product and no solution. I informed the source immediately as soon as I noticed the mistake so they could intervene right away, which they didn’t do.

**It is also important to note that the address provided is 100% correct and has been proven, as recorded in the message with a bank proof of address. This is because one of the source’s accusations (besides all the other accusations they made) was that I had given a wrong address.**
 

Attachments

  • Imagem WhatsApp 2025-12-05 às 12.30.56_0e93a24b.webp
    Imagem WhatsApp 2025-12-05 às 12.30.56_0e93a24b.webp
    205.8 KB · Views: 37
Last edited:
that sucks man. but thats a shipping company issue imo, not a source issue.
How they handled it definitely isnt great.
Yes, brother, I never blamed the source for the mistake. But since the source was the one who hired DPD, they are mainly responsible for DPD’s mistakes in my opinion. They want to put all the blame on me, even though I paid for the product and gave all the information correctly. They still want to force me to buy something I don’t need in order to receive the product I already paid for.
 
So where did they get that random address from? How did you send your address?
The address given to the source is correct, and the source also properly recorded the address. From what can be understood, it was really an error due to the courier’s lack of attention. Now, since it’s a DPD mistake, who should be held responsible? The source that hired them or the customer?
 
The address given to the source is correct, and the source also properly recorded the address. From what can be understood, it was really an error due to the courier’s lack of attention. Now, since it’s a DPD mistake, who should be held responsible? The source that hired them or the customer?
Obviously 100% on the source in that case, I'm just wondering if you can show him the address you initially provided in any way
 
Obviously 100% on the source in that case, I'm just wondering if you can show him the address you initially provided in any way
All the information provided to the source is recorded in our Telegram conversation. My address, number, etc. He knows my address perfectly and can see that the registration of delivery was not done at my address.
Can you help me and share your point of view in the source’s thread? Because the source might be willing to resolve it if shown that he is wrong. Thanks, brother!

 
Obviously 100% on the source in that case, I'm just wondering if you can show him the address you initially provided in any way
I disagree. The source is responsible for the items in the package and ensuring the address is labeled properly. Things like customs seizures and what not have become responsible all the source as well and compensated with things like reships. However in this case OP did his job correctly and the source did their job correctly inputting the right information. The issue is about the shipping carriers mistake bringing the package to the wrong location. Is the source supposed to take a loss to the shipping carriers incompetence? Also OP is expecting this Chinese drug dealer to call his European shipping carrier to help identify why his package of illegal substances was delivered to the wrong location? Yes this situation definitely sucks, but I don't see this as a big deal or fuckup on the sources part. If I were me I'd be happy it was a small order and write it off. If mis-delivered packages have happened to OP in the past then he should seriously consider another delivery address/method to ensure this doesnt happen In the future.
 
I disagree. The source is responsible for the items in the package and ensuring the address is labeled properly. Things like customs seizures and what not have become responsible all the source as well and compensated with things like reships. However in this case OP did his job correctly and the source did their job correctly inputting the right information. The issue is about the shipping carriers mistake bringing the package to the wrong location. Is the source supposed to take a loss to the shipping carriers incompetence? Also OP is expecting this Chinese drug dealer to call his European shipping carrier to help identify why his package of illegal substances was delivered to the wrong location? Yes this situation definitely sucks, but I don't see this as a big deal or fuckup on the sources part. If I were me I'd be happy it was a small order and write it off. If mis-delivered packages have happened to OP in the past then he should seriously consider another delivery address/method to ensure this doesnt happen In the future.
Why are you assuming that other orders have already gone wrong with my address? I order a lot of things and receive everything. The error is definitely not with the address, please don’t make baseless assumptions like the source...
 
The address given to the source is correct, and the source also properly recorded the address. From what can be understood, it was really an error due to the courier’s lack of attention. Now, since it’s a DPD mistake, who should be held responsible? The source that hired them or the customer?
If thats the case the vendor will get refound from DPD, wich would make it easier for them as well to pay you back or send new. Dont know how much shipping services cover up to, or if value is to low dont know
 
If thats the case the vendor will get refound from DPD, wich would make it easier for them as well to pay you back or send new. Dont know how much shipping services cover up to, or if value is to low dont know
It would be easy if everything went that way... But the truth is the source doesn’t care about anything.
 
In this case, no one is to blame. the source would have to write to DPD about the incorrect delivery.
but since these are not legal means the situation is difficult.


But if you know who received the package, it would be worth trying to pick it up from there yourself.
 
In this case, no one is to blame. the source would have to write to DPD about the incorrect delivery.
but since these are not legal means the situation is difficult.


But if you know who received the package, it would be worth trying to pick it up from there yourself.
Of course, brother, if I knew who the package was delivered to, this post wouldn’t exist because it would already be resolved...
 
I disagree. The source is responsible for the items in the package and ensuring the address is labeled properly. Things like customs seizures and what not have become responsible all the source as well and compensated with things like reships. However in this case OP did his job correctly and the source did their job correctly inputting the right information. The issue is about the shipping carriers mistake bringing the package to the wrong location. Is the source supposed to take a loss to the shipping carriers incompetence? Also OP is expecting this Chinese drug dealer to call his European shipping carrier to help identify why his package of illegal substances was delivered to the wrong location? Yes this situation definitely sucks, but I don't see this as a big deal or fuckup on the sources part. If I were me I'd be happy it was a small order and write it off. If mis-delivered packages have happened to OP in the past then he should seriously consider another delivery address/method to ensure this doesnt happen In the future.
stop smog krak men, OP just said he provided correct address (supposedly) and that the source sent it to the wrong address (as can be seen on the tracking). Don't need to write an essay to an unrelated issue
 
Why are you assuming that other orders have already gone wrong with my address? I order a lot of things and receive everything. The error is definitely not with the address, please don’t make baseless assumptions like the source...
Not assuming anything hence why I said "if". Speaking from experience I have lived in places where I had issues with shipping carriers delivering my packages to the wrong house. All I advised was that if this was a more than one time incident that you should find another location or method, simply a suggestion. Exactly, the error was not with the address on your part or the sources part, it was due to DPD incompetence.
 
stop smog krak men, OP just said he provided correct address (supposedly) and that the source sent it to the wrong address (as can be seen on the tracking). Don't need to write an essay to an unrelated issue
It appears you lack basic reading comprehension. The source gave it to the shipping carrier WITH the correct address, the shipping carrier just failed to deliver to the right location.
 
This thread is stupid. "ALERT ALERT" like the source fucked you over. DPD's fault really not the source's. It's super easy to have the courier deliver to another address.... So I understand why a source wouldn't want to refund you. Anyone could do this and get the money+the product. Not saying you did but DPD usually calls you before making delivers or you even get an SMS/email. You should have kept your eyes on the package.

Plus if you see the right address on the tracking thing why didn't you just go get it and demand it back. At the very least you should have called dpd/courer right away and asked them for the info. I'd say if anyone could have prevented this it is you.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top