i recently heard (on yt from a content creator, who does technically have credentials but is a content creator first) that low dose tren with high test is a "Waste" bc tren competes for the receptor and wins every time
just curious of ur input bc ur sir ballistic, the based.
When it comes to certain compounds my opinion is less is more. Tren is certainly 1 of those along with Sdrol, and MTren, and Halo...for instance.
Consistently people hear “they both bind the androgen receptor” and jump to the idea that Tren somehow gets crowded out or made ineffective by high testosterone. That’s not how receptor pharmacology works in real human physiology.
Androgen receptors are not a single on/off light switchs. ARs are widely distributed throughout muscle, CNS, adipose, prostate, immune cells, etc. They're recycled constantly, and upregulated with androgen exposure.
High androgen load does not mean “full no room left.” If that were true, adding any second androgen would be useless, which we know is false from decades of real world outcomes. Even at low mg doses, Tren exerts disproportionate signaling effects compared to testosterone. This is signaling in parallel really.
People often misguide with how Tren works because they simply don't know. Tren alters glucocorticoid signaling (anti-catabolic this is a big one at low dose), strongly impacts IGF-1 expression, and has CNS effects unrelated to pure AR occupying. Tren drives nutrient partitioning via nongenomic (check my spelling) pathways.
50–150 mg/week Tren can dramatically alter body composition. It certainly increases strength disproportionate to scale weight anyone who's taken it knows this. Meanwhile it gives an enhanced hardness and look you can't miss unless your grossly playing outside your league and fat.
Meanwhile, 600to 1000 mg testosterone will be primary driving bulk, fullness, and the estrogenic environment. ←This part is important on Tren. Test acts as a foundation, not a replacement. These roles are complementary, not mutually exclusive.
I don't know who that gentleman is you speak of, I don't really get out much. Haha
But I'm confident very much so in saying he's wrong.
Edit: Here is a tidbit of dosing from various cattle studies. These are different in method of delivery. They are slow. So why are humans taking doses above what was given to 1000lb animals which returned incredible results? There was a gent here not long ago running 1g Tren, wondering why his kidneys were failing. Jeez I don't know fella. Haha
Revalor-G / TBA/E40 mg TBA + 8 mg E2
Estradiol. Used early in feeding/growth phase
Merck Animal Health USA
Revalor-S120 mg TBA + 24 mg E2 Estradiol
Mid-level finishing implant
DailyMed
Revalor-200 or Revalor-XS
200 mg TBA + 20–40 mg E2 Estradiol
High dose / long release
DailyMed +1
Synovex® one variants
50–200 mg TBA + 7–28 mg E2 Estradiol
Multiple dose strengths exist
Zoetis
Finaplix-H
200 mg TBA (no estradiol)
Pure trenbolone implant (without estrogen)