Alibaba HGH

I'm confused about the testing. Admittedly I know very little about it.

For the 82% purity in the sample that you linked to:
Is that 82% not a reflection of the quantity of powder that is hGH? In other words, if a chunk of the powder was removed from the vial; does this test state that 82% of that chunk is hGH?
I guess what I am saying is that I thought any hGH in a sample is "pure" hGH......but it could be diluted with other fillers to bring down the purity percentage of the vial.
The filler would be zero% hGH, correct? Actually, anything that is not hGH would be zero% hGH.
So any hGH in the chunk of powder would be "pure" hGH?
There can only be two things in a vial of hGH:
1) hGH
2) stuff that is not hGH
Is that reasonably accurate?
That 82% is faked graph, they took an image from here - Complete Solubilization and Purification of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone Produced in Escherichia coli

upload_2018-5-8_0-51-34.png

And photoshopped it.


I don't think any conclusions can be made from a faked graph.
 
That 82% is faked graph, they took an image from here - Complete Solubilization and Purification of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone Produced in Escherichia coli

View attachment 90120

And photoshopped it.


I don't think any conclusions can be made from a faked graph.
Well I don't understand the graphs anyway.
But I do read...... a lot.

I read about a fiasco involving a member here and some hGH results that he received on a sample that was never actually delivered to the tester. Graph or no graph, I would consider results, for a test that was never performed, to be fake.
Do you recall this?
I find it difficult to believe that one who manufactured results could reliably accuse another of manufacturing results.
I'm not saying you are wrong about what you posted, because I simply do not know.
I AM saying that you should have probably just stayed out of this conversation.
 
Well I don't understand the graphs anyway.
But I do read...... a lot.

I read about a fiasco involving a member here and some hGH results that he received on a sample that was never actually delivered to the tester. Graph or no graph, I would consider results, for a test that was never performed, to be fake.
Do you recall this?
I find it difficult to believe that one who manufactured results could reliably accuse another of manufacturing results.
I'm not saying you are wrong about what you posted, because I simply do not know.
I AM saying that you should have probably just stayed out of this conversation.
I'm sure somebody will be happy to explain for you and I am sure, that the information will be appreciated by some.

Withholding that information would come to me as unfair move towards those using their services.
 
Well I don't understand the graphs anyway.
But I do read...... a lot.

I read about a fiasco involving a member here and some hGH results that he received on a sample that was never actually delivered to the tester. Graph or no graph, I would consider results, for a test that was never performed, to be fake.
Do you recall this?
I find it difficult to believe that one who manufactured results could reliably accuse another of manufacturing results.
I'm not saying you are wrong about what you posted, because I simply do not know.
I AM saying that you should have probably just stayed out of this conversation.

Jano is right. You don’t have to know how to interpret the graphs to know that they were stolen from the link he posted with minimal editing. In addition, it seems Energy Control has responded that they do not deny it.

DO NOT USE ENERGY CONTROL!

I apologize for recommending them to anyone. I do not know he extent of the testing that they performed, if any at all. But the data they provided Jano and me has been found to be falsified.
 
While I am not happy with the way the situation is unfolding I have to remind myself that.... Gentlemen, it's okay. This is to be expected in the world of underground drugs. Analyzer will either be back up and running or someone will fill in the void eventually. We still have several good choices currently to provide low cost ie under $1 a unit growth hormone. I believe our next Focus as a group should be finding someone we can send blind samples to that will conduct HPLC testing for us. When I get back from Italy I will start digging around as I hope many of you will.
 
I believe our next Focus as a group should be finding someone we can send blind samples to that will conduct HPLC testing for us. When I get back from Italy I will start digging around as I hope many of you will.
X2 and will do re researching a new potential viable GH testing source. I'm based in Western Europe so I'll take a closer look at what's on offer in my neighborhood.
 
Back
Top