All Our Patent Are Belong To You

flenser

New Member
AnabolicLab.com Supporter
I don't have much hope in the future of electric cars, but damn this guy has balls! IP laws are the scourge of real progress IMO, granting innovation crushing monopolies and pumping vast sums of money into the legal industry.

Code:
http://www.teslamotors.com/blog/all-our-patent-are-belong-you

All Our Patent Are Belong To You
By Elon Musk, CEO

Yesterday, there was a wall of Tesla patents in the lobby of our Palo Alto headquarters. That is no longer the case. They have been removed, in the spirit of the open source movement, for the advancement of electric vehicle technology.

Tesla Motors was created to accelerate the advent of sustainable transport. If we clear a path to the creation of compelling electric vehicles, but then lay intellectual property landmines behind us to inhibit others, we are acting in a manner contrary to that goal. Tesla will not initiate patent lawsuits against anyone who, in good faith, wants to use our technology.

When I started out with my first company, Zip2, I thought patents were a good thing and worked hard to obtain them. And maybe they were good long ago, but too often these days they serve merely to stifle progress, entrench the positions of giant corporations and enrich those in the legal profession, rather than the actual inventors. After Zip2, when I realized that receiving a patent really just meant that you bought a lottery ticket to a lawsuit, I avoided them whenever possible.

At Tesla, however, we felt compelled to create patents out of concern that the big car companies would copy our technology and then use their massive manufacturing, sales and marketing power to overwhelm Tesla. We couldn’t have been more wrong. The unfortunate reality is the opposite: electric car programs (or programs for any vehicle that doesn’t burn hydrocarbons) at the major manufacturers are small to non-existent, constituting an average of far less than 1% of their total vehicle sales.

At best, the large automakers are producing electric cars with limited range in limited volume. Some produce no zero emission cars at all.

Given that annual new vehicle production is approaching 100 million per year and the global fleet is approximately 2 billion cars, it is impossible for Tesla to build electric cars fast enough to address the carbon crisis. By the same token, it means the market is enormous. Our true competition is not the small trickle of non-Tesla electric cars being produced, but rather the enormous flood of gasoline cars pouring out of the world’s factories every day.

We believe that Tesla, other companies making electric cars, and the world would all benefit from a common, rapidly-evolving technology platform.

Technology leadership is not defined by patents, which history has repeatedly shown to be small protection indeed against a determined competitor, but rather by the ability of a company to attract and motivate the world’s most talented engineers. We believe that applying the open source philosophy to our patents will strengthen rather than diminish Tesla’s position in this regard.
 
Ben Franklin never filed a single patent as all his inventions by his words were for the people, as far as we have come imagine how far we could be without said "protection" patents afford. Of course individuals would not be so far ahead but society as a whole - absolutely. The possibilities are mind boggling if you consider it. Not saying the patent system is right or wrong, just food for thought.
 
I believe individuals and society would both be better off, even in the short term. A lot of data exists that shows inventors of successful products spent more time protecting their patents than improving their inventions. The costly task often allowed their competitors to improve the invention while waiting for the patent to expire, then make new patents to block innovations by the original inventor. The book "Against Intellectual Monopoly" by (I think) David Levine has a lot of examples.
 
I believe individuals and society would both be better off, even in the short term. A lot of data exists that shows inventors of successful products spent more time protecting their patents than improving their inventions. The costly task often allowed their competitors to improve the invention while waiting for the patent to expire, then make new patents to block innovations by the original inventor. The book "Against Intellectual Monopoly" by (I think) David Levine has a lot of examples.

I agree with you sadly this is the way the world works these days. I'll definitely have to check out that book maybe I can learn a few things from it.
 
I agree with you sadly this is the way the world works these days. I'll definitely have to check out that book maybe I can learn a few things from it.
He's also against copyright laws, so there should be a free online version..
 
Back
Top