I understand what you're trying to say and on the surface I can see how a reaction such as yours seems legitimate. However, as I've stated and it is true, elaborating on his data purging is NOT a security risk, UNLESS he has shitty protocols or no protocols.
If you see this holding sources accountable for THEIR statements and claims as a "witch hunt" then you need to reevaluate the term "witch hunt." I'm not fabricating anything for the purpose of some blind persecuting endeavor, I'm trying to hold the source accountable for their statements. If you can't see why thats important to members trying to make an educated decision about purchasing AAS, I don't know how else to explain it. And if you plain out just don't care, then so be it.
Regarding your innuendo that I have "other motives" for being involved at this capacity, guess what - time to be held accountable for that
. Now, please explain what my "motives" are.