I've shown myself to be a big advocate for harm reduction and making sure these sources stay on point, but I don't really see any additional testing measures needed personally. This question is better suited for
@janoshik but I think what
@readalot is obsessively pushing for is a bit much. Again, I'm all for more testing measures but most of this is unnecessary and will cost a sustantial amount more. To put it into perspective a member or vendor pays $120 per sample hplc tested. When you add GCMS + sterility to that the cost is well over $500.
Truth be told I've just be silent in the shadows waiting on readalot to actually provide some reports so that it would show that it was unnecessary, but its getting tiresome seeing troll like behavior that has carried on for as long as it has. Which is what is happening when someone bounces in every source's thread on numerous forums demanding the vendor do what they want. There was a much different way of going about this. A simple discussion with Jano would have been a nice start.