WC, i think your approach works and i think it helps a lot of people...especially those who only check in maybe a couple of times a week and don't live on the board. I am sure compiling all of that was a big bit of work, but it has to have helped some guys that maybe didn't have the patience to read every derailed page of a thread about a source. It has to help counter the shills and sources trying to steer conversation away from the questions we want answered.
This touchy, feely crap we have been getting lately about people being sensitive in the underground has gone a bit far. I understand that the name calling and personal attacks can go too far and drown out the legitimate questions/issues we have with sources. It probably turns off some readers and loses some audience on the subject. That being said, sometimes the sources just get so goofy that the only thing you are left with is a internet browbeat of some sort. I think you shift gears pretty well and keep a good mix of both, as do a few others.
Just wanted to let you know the work is appreciated whether by you or anyone else taking the same tact. I enjoy the approach and i usually have no problem pulling the facts out from previous posts to get the story.
This touchy, feely crap we have been getting lately about people being sensitive in the underground has gone a bit far. I understand that the name calling and personal attacks can go too far and drown out the legitimate questions/issues we have with sources. It probably turns off some readers and loses some audience on the subject. That being said, sometimes the sources just get so goofy that the only thing you are left with is a internet browbeat of some sort. I think you shift gears pretty well and keep a good mix of both, as do a few others.
Just wanted to let you know the work is appreciated whether by you or anyone else taking the same tact. I enjoy the approach and i usually have no problem pulling the facts out from previous posts to get the story.