Beware of MANWHORE / Voodoo - Underdosed bunk dangerous infection unsafe liar security risk deranged

[CensoredBoardsSuck]

I'm not looking for an argument at all but it's obvious who the clique is everybody is seing it, all I'm saying is that WC can fight his own battles why does everybody have to jump in? He has done a pretty good job on his own as far as I can see.

If there is a "clique," it is made up of members who have gotten to know each other over time and they have developed a certain degree of trust. There is no 'us versus them' here, except when it comes to sources and their shills and dick riders. New members are welcome to join the "clique" but it won't happen over night. It takes time to build trust when everyone is posting under an alias.

 

[WILL.E.NAYLER]

If youve not followed ive stuck up for MW through this...not so much anymore. No one is jumping in, i spoke what this board was about in my post that you quoted. He went against that.

As for the cliques.... There are none, just because people are like minded they're not a clique.

I didn't quote your post I know your a lot more neutral, and I know how it is with you and MW, and people are jumping in MW only mentioned WC but he hasn't responded but many more have in his defence.. Just saying that I don't see why, he is more than capable of handling it himself.. It happens all the time.

 

[bickel29]

I'm not looking for an argument at all but it's obvious who the clique is everybody is seing it, all I'm saying is that WC can fight his own battles why does everybody have to jump in? He has done a pretty good job on his own as far as I can see.

Hey Will, I am not looking for an argument either, but when someone makes a statement as strongly accusatory as referencing a clique and insinuating that it may be affecting or influencing the contributions of the masses here --- but then won't name who it is they are accusing of such behavior --- it nullifies the validity of the claim itself, in my mind.

If you want to call someone or some members out, go for it. Having got to know a lot of the fellas around here, it is my belief that most of us would respect that more than slinging generic, unspecified labels on to 'some members'.

Again, not looking for an argument... I'm not saying, I'm just saying...

 

[WILL.E.NAYLER]

If there is a "clique," it is made up of members who have gotten to know each other over time and they have developed a certain degree of trust. There is no 'us versus them' here, except when it comes to sources and their shills and dick riders. New members are welcome to join the "clique" but it won't happen over night. It takes time to build trust when everyone is posting under an alias.

I haven't posted much on here much anymore as I feel it is "us vs them" I'm not interested in trying to get into that little group of people that protect each other, my point is that there is no need for it, I want to see an argument between two people to see what the outcome is and who has the best point... Not someone going against the grain and getting blown out of the water by 5 wkms sticking up for his buddy.

 

[Fckit]

I didn't quote your post I know your a lot more neutral, and I know how it is with you and MW, and people are jumping in MW only mentioned WC but he hasn't responded but many more have in his defence.. Just saying that I don't see why, he is more than capable of handling it himself.. It happens all the time.

So with this logic, MW is more than capable of defending himself as well.

 

[WILL.E.NAYLER]

Hey Will, I am not looking for an argument either, but when someone makes a statement as strongly accusatory as referencing a clique and insinuating that it may be affecting or influencing the contributions of the masses here --- but then won't name who it is they are accusing of such behavior --- it nullifies the validity of the claim itself, in my mind.

If you want to call someone or some members out, go for it. Having got to know a lot of the fellas around here, it is my belief that most of us would respect that more than slinging generic, unspecified labels on to 'some members'.

Again, not looking for an argument... I'm not saying, I'm just saying...

Look above your post, it was a debate between me and you... Now I will have to have it with maybe 3 to 4 different people.. Just like everybody else that has a different point of view towards you (but not just you)... Do you think that maybe influencing the contribution of the masses here?

 

[WILL.E.NAYLER]

So with this logic, MW is more than capable of defending himself as well.

Of course that's what I am saying... Who is sticking up for MW anyway?

 

[bickel29]

Is it just me, or does it seem like the ONLY members who give a fawk about these titles like WKM and Awesome Member, happen to be the members without those titles?

Here's a little secret from within the Clique - none of us "in any clique" even know, or care, who is a WKM, Awesome Member, etc. Nor do we even pay attention to how said titles are earned or assigned.

 

[Fckit]

Of course that's what I am saying... Who is sticking up for MW anyway?

Well, you are. If he gets attacked from someone or multiple people, it's between them and him. So let him fight his own battles. That's what you are implying in your previous posts

Well, that... Or you're just trying to start shit by being an attention whore and pushing your whole "clique" conspiracy theory

 

[bickel29]

Look above your post, it was a debate between me and you... Now I will have to have it with maybe 3 to 4 different people.. Just like everybody else that has a different point of view towards you (but not just you)... Do you think that maybe influencing the contribution of the masses here?

Brother, just because 3, 4, 5 or 10 people disagree with you and then express it, doesn't mean that they are following anyone's lead. Maybe they just disagree with you?

 

[Voltrader]

Wait a minute I thought it was the Posey.

 

[WILL.E.NAYLER]

Tbh I don't give a fuck about MW the guy is on another planet.. This thread was an example that's all, it happens whenever someone goes against someone from the clique.. It's happening to me now.. I started off talking to 1 person now I am explaining myself to 3... See what I mean?

 

[WILL.E.NAYLER]

Wait a minute I thought it was the Posey.

And another one joins the party...

 

[Gearline]

Wow how some of the original members have turned scammer on this board. This place is showing its true colors with the clowns around here.

 

[johnnyBALLZ]

I haven't posted much on here much anymore as I feel it is "us vs them" I'm not interested in trying to get into that little group of people that protect each other, my point is that there is no need for it, I want to see an argument between two people to see what the outcome is and who has the best point... Not someone going against the grain and getting blown out of the water by 5 wkms sticking up for his buddy.

Willie, please shut the fuck up. You've been nothing but a shit stirrer since you joined. You don't like it here as you stated above then leave and stop wasting your time.

You know my history with MW? I'll jump in against that motherfucker whenever the hell I please.

If I were you I'd spend my forum time learning about AAS and trying to find a solid source not spouting off about shit you know nothing about.

 

[Fckit]

Tbh I don't give a fuck about MW the guy is on another planet.. This thread was an example that's all, it happens whenever someone goes against someone from the clique.. It's happening to me now.. I started off talking to 1 person now I am explaining myself to 3... See what I mean?

See below:

Brother, just because 3, 4, 5 or 10 people disagree with you and then express it, doesn't mean that they are following anyone's lead. Maybe they just disagree with you?

 

[WILL.E.NAYLER]

Brother, just because 3, 4, 5 or 10 people disagree with you and then express it, doesn't mean that they are following anyone's lead. Maybe they just disagree with you?

If I quote someone with a different point of view why would others get involved? Wouldn't it between me and whoever I disagreed with?

 

[WILL.E.NAYLER]

See below:

It's always the same people... That's my point!

 

[Fckit]

It's always the same people... That's my point!

So because some or many disagree, they shouldn't voice their opinions? It hasn't seemed to stop you

 

[WILL.E.NAYLER]

Willie, please shut the fuck up. You've been nothing but a shit stirrer since you joined. You don't like it here as you stated above then leave and stop wasting your time.

You know my history with MW? I'll jump in against that motherfucker whenever the hell I please.

If I were you I'd spend my forum time learning about AAS and trying to find a solid source not spouting off about shit you know nothing about.

What's this number 5?? Do you think I am the only one who doesn't enjoy it here because of bell ends like you? And I haven't shit stirred I have had a point of view, but if your not in the clique you should keep that shit to yourself right?