Big Bear Labs U.S. Domestic

It’s not confusing I just explained it. I didn’t want anyone confusing that number with anything else.
You explained it, and your explanation was overly complex, and confusing.

That’s the point I was making.

This is like you with your pics of your university flow hood. Overly complex, and indiotic. Anyone who orders from you must have a head injury.
 
Batch 1
8604/01 (01 replaced with type of steroid)

Batch 2
8605/01 (01 replaced with type of steroid)

Is that easier to understand? Started with a higher number so dates couldn’t be misconstrued as batch numbers.
 
Batch 1
8604/01 (01 replaced with type of steroid)

Batch 2
8605/01 (01 replaced with type of steroid)

Is that easier to understand? Started with a higher number so dates couldn’t be misconstrued as batch numbers.

All a ugl label needs is this:

Compound
Concentration
Batch number.

Example:
Test Cyp
250mg/ml
Batch #1


Just keep it simple man.
 
We all have our own ways of running things, this was the way I wanted to do it to keep it easy from confusing people and allowing me to convey the pertinent information
 
They might not be contributing the way you expect them to but they are ordering and trying sources letting you know that their packs are landing/drugs working. That’s their contribution. Not everyone has read anabolics 11 or thousands of pubmed papers. Not everyone is going to comment their .02 on nutrition or training program. They might still be learning those things or think their opinions would fall on deaf ears. I understand what you’re saying but I think you need something more quantifiable or more enforceable
 
They might not be contributing the way you expect them to but they are ordering and trying sources letting you know that their packs are landing/drugs working. That’s their contribution. Not everyone has read anabolics 11 or thousands of pubmed papers. Not everyone is going to comment their .02 on nutrition or training program. They might still be learning those things or think their opinions would fall on deaf ears. I understand what you’re saying but I think you need something more quantifiable or more enforceable
When we see something new from a newb, it means nothing though and raises suspicions that maybe the source is creating these new accounts to try and help boost confidence and sales. That’s just the way it is.
 
I personally don’t like stuff like that. I prefer to be straightforward and anyone here who has done business with me can attest to my promptness and I am constantly trying to do what people would like. For instance increasing EQ from 200 to 300mg/ml, 25mgx30 $30 anavar to 25mgx60 $50, same with anadrol. You guys need goods and I need customers. There has to be a mutual trust and I try my best to give that.
 
What's confusing is that non contributing members here are ordering and trying to vouch for your piss poor operation.

mands

You mean the guys that have only been here a couple months and have less than 10 posts - all of which are only in this thread? Those guys?

See, they’re just shy. They don’t feel comfortable shooting the shit, asking advice or chiming in - things that members of a community typically do.

This thread would drop to the bottom if it weren’t for those couple post “shy” members confidently bumping the thread, or @BigBearLabs himself dropping in every 2 weeks to give it a bump.

@BigBearLabs wants us to “trust him” but he hasn’t done anything to build that trust.

Firstly, there’s the stock raws results he pulled from failed Sherlock Labs (@MisterSuperGod had to point that out because @BigBearLabs wasn’t upfront about it).

Secondly, pictures of his “lab” are from a college lab (don’t worry though, he’s got clear access).

Then thirdly, it’s the newb reviews that don’t seem on the up and up.

He’s been here since right before Christmas and it’s impossible to get him to go away!
 
I personally don’t like stuff like that. I prefer to be straightforward and anyone here who has done business with me can attest to my promptness and I am constantly trying to do what people would like. For instance increasing EQ from 200 to 300mg/ml, 25mgx30 $30 anavar to 25mgx60 $50, same with anadrol. You guys need goods and I need customers. There has to be a mutual trust and I try my best to give that.
Didn’t you also have 75mg Tren A or was that someone else?
 
Firstly, there’s the stock raws results he pulled from failed Sherlock Labs (@MisterSuperGod had to point that out because @BigBearLabs wasn’t upfront about it).

Secondly, pictures of his “lab” are from a college lab (don’t worry though, he’s got clear access).

Then thirdly, it’s the newb reviews that don’t seem on the up and up.

He’s been here since right before Christmas and it’s impossible to get him to go away!
Might I remind you that he has new labels on the way with a neat bear on them AND he has “reserved” Big Bear Test E!
 
Didn’t you also have 75mg Tren A or was that someone else?

Yes I do. This brew we have increased it to 100mg/ml because someone had complained that 75 was too low, that comes with a price increase but it’s what people want and seems to be in line with a few other labs.
 
I modeled test p mast p and tren a at 75mg/ml which Was based on cut mix blends you see. I don’t mind making it a stronger dose and charging a little more. I’m here to fulfill what customers want/need. I’m currently making a preworkout, Tren base test base sdrol. Trying to decide on ratios
 
Might I remind you that he has new labels on the way with a neat bear on them AND he has “reserved” Big Bear Test E!

I think that circled R is “registered”.

But [emoji2369] I don’t know why he’s got it on his labels.

“Herro, chinaman printing. Har may I help you... yes yes... Rx on rabels... no probrem.”

But chinaman make a mistake and put the symbol for registered trademark instead. Also probably messed up the batch number forcing @BigBearLabs to offer his overly complicated explanation on his “system”.
 
I don’t understand how it’s over complicated[emoji23] it literally couldn’t be any easier. It just starts with a high enough number you won’t mistake with the date
 
Back
Top