BioLogic Pharmaceuticals

Wanna hear something weird?? This^^ is why I don't want to go on TRT, what happens when you can't get test or syringes?! I don't want to be dependent on ANY type of drug or medication when this happens..

I am already on TRT and this thought sucks! That's why I have been stocking Test for a while, 5 years worth at this point. Not sure how much farther out I can go given expiration dates and such. Are the dates just recommended dates or real? Is there a storage method that better preserves the compound?
 
I am already on TRT and this thought sucks! That's why I have been stocking Test for a while, 5 years worth at this point. Not sure how much farther out I can go given expiration dates and such. Are the dates just recommended dates or real? Is there a storage method that better preserves the compound?

Just make sure it is a cool dry place. Keep out of the light. Not sure how long it will last.
 
There was this thing call the industrial revolution. Maybe you've heard of it.

Be fair, the IR had little to do with investment and much more to do with the utilization of cheap labor markets (children/impoverished urban dwellers) due to catastrophes (Blights in Europe forcing emigrants to America), the emergence of new markets (i.e. The US West, the Americas in general), and a few key inventions by individuals, not venture capitalists. Take, for example, the magnates of industry at the turn of the century... these were individuals, not corporations representing their share-holders.

You don't see that sort of thing today... no single individual would spend BILLIONS of dollars on Rx R&D when the statistics show that most of their solutions will be errant, when they could just sit on their capital and watch it become more valuable by the inherent qualities of a deflationary economy.

Is our system perfect, no... but, people often like to act contrarily, decrying the issues of the status quo without positing a better, more efficient solution.
 
Be fair, the IR had little to do with investment and much more to do with the utilization of cheap labor markets (children/impoverished urban dwellers) due to catastrophes (Blights in Europe forcing emigrants to America), the emergence of new markets (i.e. The US West, the Americas in general), and a few key inventions by individuals, not venture capitalists. Take, for example, the magnates of industry at the turn of the century... these were individuals, not corporations representing their share-holders.

You don't see that sort of thing today... no single individual would spend BILLIONS of dollars on Rx R&D when the statistics show that most of their solutions will be errant, when they could just sit on their capital and watch it become more valuable by the inherent qualities of a deflationary economy.

Is our system perfect, no... but, people often like to act contrarily, decrying the issues of the status quo without positing a better, more efficient solution.

What has stalled individual investment and growth in the modern era as opposed to the IR is government intervention into the public sector in the form of anti trust laws. Face it. Teddy Roosevelt felt emasculated by JP Morgan being able to swing such a big dick around, not only in the private sector, but by backing the US during no less than 2 depressions, and one recession. Good ole' Teddy couldn't handle that one man that wasn't him could have the kind of power, and ramped up his anti-trust agenda to a point where it no longer created a benefit to the consumer. Anti trust laws in the post Roosevelt era have only damaged the consumers dollar because now the deals that drive up price between companies are perpetrated behind closed doors instead on the relatively cheap ability of one company to provide a service on an ever widening scale. It's also damaged drive and innovation in a serious way because individuals are far more likely to hold back due to the fact that more success and widespread control only lead to Uncle Sam stepping in to essentially crush your company. All while watching them use tax dollars to prop up failing companies because apparently the government no longer understands a moveable market share, and anti trust laws prevent another large company from stepping in to take over control of the failing company (unless you're a Wall Street investment bank, in which case you've got a golden ticket).
 
CS,

I agree with certain things you've said. I completely agree that you can't have Capitalism both ways: you can't demand a free market sometimes, and then protect failing businesses... that's the invisible hand of the market separating the wheat from the chaff.

What does fiat money have to do with free markets? And didn't you just argue against commodity based currency because they caused bank runs?
 
What does fiat money have to do with free markets? And didn't you just argue against commodity based currency because they caused bank runs?

That's my fault man. I derailed stifled industry based on commodity backed currency into stifled industry based on regulation and socialist market control.

Carry on...
 
I think you will care... you wont worry about HQ gear or Swole....;)

if you are just trying to get water, food, and protection to your family...:eek:

think more along the scope of soup lines...

come one people! pull yourselves out of the clouds long enough to see what is going on. Don't be led to the slaughter. Have your back up plans in place.

Correct. The massive federal entitlement structure, w/ its profligate spending will dry up money for the private sector. This "crowding out effect" WILL DEVASTATE the economy. It would take me a hundred posts to explain (trust me, I used to reach political economy).

As a mind bending avalanche of increased spending, concurrent more then 1 million people who have legal claims (IE can sue the Gov. if they don't get what they are entitled too) the system will be paying out more and more.

The private sector will constrict, reducing incoming tax revenue, along with the massive retirements from the boomers, also free from income taxes.

If we look at other governmental institutions, we will be hard pressed to cut spending. For example, can we cut military spending? No, the world hates us. Future wars will be unconventional. The old days of 2 massive armies lining up are over. Today, it is guerrilla warfare, smaller forces, but more expensive. We need elite spec ops to win, and they are very very expensive to train and equip.
 
Be fair, the IR had little to do with investment and much more to do with the utilization of cheap labor markets (children/impoverished urban dwellers) due to catastrophes (Blights in Europe forcing emigrants to America), the emergence of new markets (i.e. The US West, the Americas in general), and a few key inventions by individuals, not venture capitalists. Take, for example, the magnates of industry at the turn of the century... these were individuals, not corporations representing their share-holders.

You don't see that sort of thing today... no single individual would spend BILLIONS of dollars on Rx R&D when the statistics show that most of their solutions will be errant, when they could just sit on their capital and watch it become more valuable by the inherent qualities of a deflationary economy.

Is our system perfect, no... but, people often like to act contrarily, decrying the issues of the status quo without positing a better, more efficient solution.

The industrial revolution happened in the absence of modern monetary policy. Though I agree with you that the unregulated (free) markets that allowed cheap (child/impoverished) labor are the primary causes of the massive growth and prosperity that largely eliminated those conditions.

Absolutely, we don't see that sort of thing today. Computers have been falling in price continuously since the 1980's, and we know there's been absolutely no growth or innovation there. Intel, Microsoft, Google and Apple have been dominating the world financial markets by just siting on their cash and enjoying the effects of deflation.

On a side note, I just realized I'm arguing monetary policy on a forum where I'm supposed to be protecting my identity. I think I will bow out now and look for a pic of my kids to use for an AVI.
 
Thanks for the input, brother.

Edit: Also, for a first timer with Anavar stacking with Test E 500mg/wk, what do you recommend for a dosing for a 200lb male? I was thinking around 40mg/day... on the low side, but seems safe since I may be adding in Deca.
 
There's way to damn much talk about politics on here men. There needs to be more talk about big muscles, fast cars, & hot women! Lol
 
Thanks for the input, brother.

Edit: Also, for a first timer with Anavar stacking with Test E 500mg/wk, what do you recommend for a dosing for a 200lb male? I was thinking around 40mg/day... on the low side, but seems safe since I may be adding in Deca.

i was running 50mg. split into 2 doses AM / PM or before workouts...

i am sitting at 210lbs.

save the deca for another run... or not at all. I am not a fan of deca.
 
Back
Top