Brut - I like the thinking, but I wonder about one aspect of this - hoping someone else can help me see it differently, or confirm my thought.
Wouldn't our results on the blood tests, and the proceeding comparative data, only be as good as the consistency of the ACTUAL dosage in the vials? For instance, if I think I am running 50 mg ED but my tren is actually underdosed and I am only getting 30 mg ED, would this skew our results, if say, the next member was running what he thought was 50 mg ED and his was actually 70 mg ED?
I would think that our data would be difficult to cross reference, given the current state of inconsistencies in the actual dosing with ugl Tren (not the stated dosing).
It is for this same reason I always warn fellow members who tell me they are gonna run tren at the highest dose they have ever run on their next cycle, because they ran tren in their last cycle and they don't suffer from ANY sides! I warn them to still start low, because their last tren may have been underdosed (or bunk) and the next tren may be dosed at double potency.