BPC 157 poll

[Alex27]

1000mcg per day intramuscularly, gummy feeling in my arm I had epicondylitis and epitrochleitis has almost completely disappeared with administration of TB500 1000mcg and BPC157 600mcg per day for about two months, there is still something left but I will shortly do a booster replacing the TB500 with Thymosin Beta 4 .
TB500 is a fragment of Thymosin Beta 4.

 

[Benf15harp]

this is a good point and something I'll consider


Thank you, looking foward to hearing more,

What is the most BPC youve done?
What doses of TB-500 have you tried?

do you have any gut feelings or personal hypothesises about BPC?

Half life is really unknown, its just guessing.
Most I’ve taken that i was certain of is 20mg or 4 5mg vials in one day. But now I make my own and put what should be 20mg per vial but could be up to 40mg due to inaccuracy of measuring spoons and honestly it does not matter the dosage for me at least. I just take as much as I feel necessary. So, it’s a possibility that I’ve taken up to 40mg in one day. TB 500 I took one vial per day either 5 or 10mg(can’t remember) for two weeks and felt no difference so decided to just go with BPC since in my case at least I can feel it almost immediately. I think BPC should not be a banned substance for athletes(since 2022) and should be something more common and available to the masses for what I believe has pain relieving, anti-inflammatory, and healing properties. Dosage like anything is user dependent. Like HGH I can only take around 2 ius per day anymore and I’m dying. But others can take 10+ius no problem.
The one negative for BPC is i have undoubtedly developed a dependence. Hope this helps some.

 

[Liter O' Test]

Half life is really unknown, its just guessing.
Most I’ve taken that i was certain of is 20mg or 4 5mg vials in one day. But now I make my own and put what should be 20mg per vial but could be up to 40mg due to inaccuracy of measuring spoons and honestly it does not matter the dosage for me at least. I just take as much as I feel necessary. So, it’s a possibility that I’ve taken up to 40mg in one day. TB 500 I took one vial per day either 5 or 10mg(can’t remember) for two weeks and felt no difference so decided to just go with BPC since in my case at least I can feel it almost immediately. I think BPC should not be a banned substance for athletes(since 2022) and should be something more common and available to the masses for what I believe has pain relieving, anti-inflammatory, and healing properties. Dosage like anything is user dependent. Like HGH I can only take around 2 ius per day anymore and I’m dying. But others can take 10+ius no problem.
The one negative for BPC is i have undoubtedly developed a dependence. Hope this helps some.

hell yeah dude thank you

 

[Benf15harp]

hell yeah dude thank you

Last 2 cents lol forgot to mention that I only do IM pins no subq
And I don’t believe Bpc is as systemic as it’s said to be. At least for me spot specific pins are effective and I’ve tried very large single pins in hopes of it working systematically but got zero relief except for the injection site.

 

[Ateam2023]

Last 2 cents lol forgot to mention that I only do IM pins no subq
And I don’t believe Bpc is as systemic as it’s said to be. At least for me spot specific pins are effective and I’ve tried very large single pins in hopes of it working systematically but got zero relief except for the injection site.

i tried spot inspection in elbow both inside and outside elbow and honestly i didn't notice much of a difference between them, so it's probably user preference ime, no hard facts to support except for feelz

 

[jankoch]

The topic in nutshell:
'lets use research chemicals in 10-20x dose as it is 'recommended'. What can go wrong?'
'i dont want to learn about side effects because it will cause them/ give anxiety. bro anyways its a miracle healing drug and doesnt have any side effects at all. '
'i did not experienced them therefore can't exist.'

ahh so basically ostrich policy is a good way to approach drugs according to some.

Good thing these topics are created. Idiots can't be reason with who doesnt have the basic heuristics to think about anything but some people might find these as readers and see how ridic 'logic' some people have on these forums.

Junkies are junkies... the question is the drug of choice. I guess lots of people wants to use enermous amounts of something while trying to stay asleep thinking all the serious side effects are just nocebo and weak mindedness.

You use these stuff you roll a dice. Combine lots of them, use stupidly high doses and you just try your luck more and more with some very dire consequences. Pick your approach wisely. Also some people can live long using stupid doses of anything. Some are just lucky. It doesnt mean you need to test this luck all the fucking time.

 

[Benf15harp]

The topic in nutshell:
'lets use research chemicals in 10-20x dose as it is 'recommended'. What can go wrong?'
'i dont want to learn about side effects because it will cause them/ give anxiety. bro anyways its a miracle healing drug and doesnt have any side effects at all. '
'i did not experienced them therefore can't exist.'

ahh so basically ostrich policy is a good way to approach drugs according to some.

Good thing these topics are created. Idiots can't be reason with who doesnt have the basic heuristics to think about anything but some people might find these as readers and see how ridic 'logic' some people have on these forums.

Junkies are junkies... the question is the drug of choice. I guess lots of people wants to use enermous amounts of something while trying to stay asleep thinking all the serious side effects are just nocebo and weak mindedness.

You use these stuff you roll a dice. Combine lots of them, use stupidly high doses and you just try your luck more and more with some very dire consequences. Pick your approach wisely. Also some people can live long using stupid doses of anything. Some are just lucky. It doesnt mean you need to test this luck all the fucking time.

And who recommended these doses and they were based on what exactly? I’ll wait……
Also, I’ve never once suggested anyone use my protocol.
Lastly, I never said that people didn’t experience side effects. My point here is to find out why they are experiencing them ie preexisting mental health issues or medication interactions etc and if they got the desired healing benefit. So, did the good outweigh the bad or was it ineffective?
Carry on. Be well.

 

[Benf15harp]

It should be well known that many of the sources of Bpc and other peptides are not exactly a guarantee. Seems no one that experienced the aforementioned sides are telling their source or if their Bpc was tested. It’s not improbable that their Bpc was filled with impurities or not Bpc at all.
People around here take 10x the recommended doses of hgh or aas and are considered cool. Lol.
Also, what type of people are these studies being made on? I doubt seriously they are doing it for free. What’s that mean? They need money and imo means they are suboptimal. Better than rats I guess.