Pericles, I certainly meant no offense or attitude to ANYONE on this board and CERTAINLY NOT the doctor. Obviously it was taken that way so please accept my appologies.
I have indeed read at least a hundred hours of forum posts and abstracts on all this over the last month alone. Instead of making me more informed, I found more and more discrepancies that alarmed me given the severity of improper PCT. THIS is why I numbered my questions and tried to keep them specific. It is NOT because I didn't bother to research.
The last few posts have brought up something I've found several times which is exactly my point above: most on the forums and Internet equate SCALLY PCT with PoWeR PCT, the latter being found in "Anabolics 10th Edition" most recently and here
PCT - PurePeptide.com
Yet, as above, I've seen several arguments about or at least disagreements over that equation. It leaves me quite confused. In that link, it says "One of the key doctors on this program, Dr. Michael Scally....". So I originally equated the above myself. Also in that same link, it says HCG is 2000IU EOD. Yet in my very post, the good Dr (meant sincerely and free of any sarcasm) says "HCG IS NOT EOD".
Now, can any of you see how I may be confused? I can see you think I'm a new student who hasn't bothered to do his homework but that is not the case. No offense taken. Can you try to understand my position of confusion in this light and avoid offense?
I've been teaching university Engish a while, science to grade school, and concise business writting seminars to professionals. I'm used to the same questions ad naseum. It doesn't bother me. When a student is seeking, nothing feels better than to help him find. Every time. It's leading a horse to water that I won't do.
The point is I see not only diametric disagreement between forum members on the subject of PCT as it is, and the dire consequences of incorrect execution, but I seem to see disagreement as to what is ACTUALLY recommended by Dr. Scally himself. So I wanted to clear it right up and ask him directly. And if I could afford it, I would call him and ask.
Which brings me to the other point. Shark, Stretch, I read Sharks words the same as you did Stretch, at face value; perhaps the Dr wishes to consult for profit. However, unlike others who seem to take that as a negative comment, I say,"since when was profit from one's own knowledge and work a negative thing!?" I say, IF that is the reason for any withholding of answers, it's fair play and not a negative thing at all.
So, Dr Scally, please accept my appologies for any disrespect that you or anyone else has perceived. I humbly request to start over.