Congrats Millard.!

This is what I saw on this page

Pharmacom Labs PHARMA Test E300 is presented in a 10ml vial and contains 300 milligrams of testosterone enanthate per milliliter according to the label and packaging.

And everything is 100%

First of all even pharmaceutical grade is off by a few %, and it would mean also that they have access to 100% pure powders in China, which makes me to laugh.

There is also deviation error when tested either on GC or HPLC, it is impossible to measure with 100% accuracy .
 
This is what I saw on this page

Pharmacom Labs PHARMA Test E300 is presented in a 10ml vial and contains 300 milligrams of testosterone enanthate per milliliter according to the label and packaging.

And everything is 100%

First of all even pharmaceutical grade is off by a few %, and it would mean also that they have access to 100% pure powders in China, which makes me to laugh.

There is also deviation error when tested either on GC or HPLC, it is impossible to measure with 100% accuracy .
You need to click on the title to see the results. They were all slightly over the advertised concentrations.
 
This is what I saw on this page

Pharmacom Labs PHARMA Test E300 is presented in a 10ml vial and contains 300 milligrams of testosterone enanthate per milliliter according to the label and packaging.

And everything is 100%

First of all even pharmaceutical grade is off by a few %, and it would mean also that they have access to 100% pure powders in China, which makes me to laugh.

There is also deviation error when tested either on GC or HPLC, it is impossible to measure with 100% accuracy .
All we have are the results from a single vial man. That's just one test. Now if we get multiple tests of different batches from the same UGL we'll see if there is consistency.
 
You need to click on the title to see the results. They were all slightly over the advertised concentrations.

I think Hg sees the demise of Labmax is on the horizon and the gravy train is coming to an end. When he sees the samples were slightly over label claims, he'll say the powder's purity must have been greater than 100%!
 
Thanks Millard. Such a great way to keep labs accountable for the products they are putting out. This is especially true for those of us that have wives that are also into the lifestyle. Glad that Meso is the one and only board I belong to as this community sets the standard for the entire AAS community.

Independent Analytical Lab Testing for Anabolic Steroid Harm Reduction
Analytical lab testing (e.g. steroid quantification testing, microbiological testing and heavy metal testing) will answer the following questions about underground steroid products:

  • Does the product contain the quantities of the active ingredients listed on the label?
  • Does the product contain another similar substance as a substitution for what is listed on the label (e.g. stanozolol instead of oxandrolone)?
  • Does the product contain impurities and contaminants?
  • Does the product contain other steroid precursors, unidentified steroidal compounds and/or unprocessed intermediary substances?
  • Does the product contain heavy metal contamination (e.g. lead, mercury, arsenic)?
 
Great work Millard and hope this helps keep the junk out as way too many people are getting burned by half-assed ugl's who only care about the money. Keeping people safe is always a good thing.
 
This is what I saw on this page

Pharmacom Labs PHARMA Test E300 is presented in a 10ml vial and contains 300 milligrams of testosterone enanthate per milliliter according to the label and packaging.

And everything is 100%

First of all even pharmaceutical grade is off by a few %, and it would mean also that they have access to 100% pure powders in China, which makes me to laugh.

There is also deviation error when tested either on GC or HPLC, it is impossible to measure with 100% accuracy .

Do you never stop shilling for Labmax???? I've yet to see you say one bad word about labmax, a reagent test nonetheless, that had a pretty high standard for error yet an HPLC/mass spec/etc test which is the industry standard you can't even say one good word for here? If your true colors weren't evident before they're glowing neon now.

And FYI, Just bc the label matched the actual concentration, the concentration was actually higher than what the label stated, doesn't mean they have access to 100% pure powders. All it means is they used enough of the powders they have access to to meet label claims. You said you were a science teacher and you can even see this line of reasoning?
 
Is anyone else shocked at how great all the results are so far?

Its only time till a lab gets caught with its pants down. I was expecting sub par results to be honest. Hopefully labs will understand this is a win win for them as these good tests will surely generate more business for them. It would be in their best interest to make anonymous contributions to help these tests come to light. Its free and independent marketing for them.
 
Back
Top