Dr Jims Hplc/ms Data

But Enig continue to use LM to evaluate you'd AAS bc doing so would ensure you BOTH REMAIN ENIGMAS, how fitting!
 
I don´t disagree in that point!

It doesn't matter if you agree ITS A FACT.

Try looking up existing WADA standards fella, hmm oddly they "do agree with me", lol!

Can you prove me wrong with LM literature, NOT!

Oh also in fairness to LM the results are HIGHLY user dependent.

Which means mates like Merc or Flesner are much more apt to produce consistently reliable results yet those whom are "giving it a go" have a reasonably long learning curve ahead of them and are best off having others validate their results.
 
Last edited:
But Enig continue to use LM to evaluate you'd AAS bc doing so would ensure you BOTH REMAIN ENIGMAS, how fitting!

haha true story. I will never now exactly.
Which samples you test for the community, how correctly it is done, and by whom you get paid will stay another enigma for me ;-)
 
Smh... I should have guessed @Enigma was friends with @mercury ... birds of a feather and all. I have products waiting for testing by jim. I had tham labmaxed first. After jim finishes his testing they go to ecstasy data. I get bloods when I run gear. What other testing would you like me to do ho and mo? I am sorry to have challenged you in your nine day tenure- mercury vouched for you so you must work for labmax.

I have been burned by just about every PUBLIC UGL I used. I count underdosed as bunk- I count underdosed as getting burned. Thats why I buy private- but this project is vital to showing the dogshit these public ugl's turn out. If you would like to talk about labmax go in the fucking labmax thread. If you question these results please let us know where you think a better mass spec can be had.
 
I don´t disagree in that point!


From Ecstastdata:


EcstasyData <info@ecstasydata.org>
6:44 PM (3 hours ago)
cleardot.gif


cleardot.gif


All are GC/MS analyzed.

Every sample that arrives at the lab with the appropriate co-payment /
payment is :

Logged, assigned an ID, photographed, checked with three field reagents,
then the sample is dissolved in a solvent and injected into the GC/MS.

Field reagent tests are best thought of as rule in/rule out tests and
not identification methods. They can NEVER identify a drug, only
indicate whether the sample is consistent with or not consistent with a
given chemical.


Hope that helps,

earth​
 
From Ecstastdata:


EcstasyData <info@ecstasydata.org>
6:44 PM (3 hours ago)
cleardot.gif


cleardot.gif


All are GC/MS analyzed.

Every sample that arrives at the lab with the appropriate co-payment /
payment is :

Logged, assigned an ID, photographed, checked with three field reagents,
then the sample is dissolved in a solvent and injected into the GC/MS.

Field reagent tests are best thought of as rule in/rule out tests and
not identification methods. They can NEVER identify a drug, only
indicate whether the sample is consistent with or not consistent with a
given chemical.


Hope that helps,

earth​

Well I don't agree with that! Thanks Reg, lol!
 
Smh... I should have guessed @Enigma was friends with @mercury ... birds of a feather and all. I have products waiting for testing by jim.

how is that supposed to contribute to steroid testing ?

you are welcomed to have personal feelings towards members but why do not take it private and PM some of your nude pictures.
 
Hey Jim, take a look at this. This an HPLC of a manufacturer that supplies at least 80%+ of the market. Thoughts?
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    32.7 KB · Views: 52
Just to pass you info, there were a few labs here in Europe to test gear.

But for whatever the reason nobody is accepting steroids anymore. Maybe new law or just the police pressure, nobody knows what happened.
 
Perhaps the long arm of the DEA. Most labs do NOT want their names advertised for fear reprisals by LE in the US and apparently abroad. Don't know but I would suspect those countries where many drugs are decriminalized such as the Netherlands may have more liberalized testing rules and regulations.
 
Anyone able and willing to test my test cyp coming straight from the pharmacy? I'd love to show the results to all the naysayers.
 
dont get to caught up in this guys bullshit.. this is the risk we all take .. i been buying gear from the market for over 13 years and i can say that i have been pleased with majority of the gear i have bought.. i have had a very small amount of bad gear, but overrall all my gear i have purchased has been good.. not everybody will have access to pharmaceutical grade gear.. nobody is trying to be on trt .. so just do your guys research alittle there is plenty of good gear floating around.. dont get caught up in dr jim bullshit.. the guy hasnt lifted a weight in his life..post some pics brotha lets see what your all about..
 
dont get to caught up in this guys bullshit.. this is the risk we all take .. i been buying gear from the market for over 13 years and i can say that i have been pleased with majority of the gear i have bought.. i have had a very small amount of bad gear, but overrall all my gear i have purchased has been good.. not everybody will have access to pharmaceutical grade gear.. nobody is trying to be on trt .. so just do your guys research alittle there is plenty of good gear floating around.. dont get caught up in dr jim bullshit.. the guy hasnt lifted a weight in his life..post some pics brotha lets see what your all about..

So who would you say has the best gear you have purchased throughout the years?
 
Back
Top