I am wondering about the effect of HGH on muscle building during mass gain, muscle preservation during cutting, and fat loss while not being used in synergy with AAS. As a stand-alone, is anyone aware of the benefits of HGH usage on persons that are not naturally deficient in growth hormone?
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
Effectivness of HGH without AAS usage
- Thread starter bigtex69
- Start date
I used rHGH single, if you use the right dose, eat, train, sleep well the rHGH are really good. If you dont have lot of money, or know a safe place to get a REAL rHGH, go with peptides, always with serious compagny, product like CJC-1295DAC & GHRP-2 per exemple is a good helper, if you dont like injection take some product like MK-677.
Peptides are not magical, but if you use well it can be an important aid and help your gains be stable, or even see gain lean mass (it's always the same thing, if you eat, train and sleep well)
Other good things, IGF-1 (pharma or research compagny) but it's always the same, you need a real and trust compagny, real IGF-1 are really expensive, but if you compare vs rHGH, the lean mass come faster, and i find it gives me more energy
I have access and enough money to get serostim for a 6 month period at 2-3 iu per day. I plan on using the HGH to cut while preserving muscle mass and increasing rate of fat loss after my 500/wk test E bulk. I have put on a little extra weight and I would like to cut it down. Im just trying to figure out if the cost of pharmaceutical quality gh is worth it, or if I would be better off saving my money and cutting naturally. I dont plan on cycling again any time soon.
At ~1 mg (3IU)/day, there will be positive anabolic effects as well as fat loss. Also, ...
@Michael Scally MD, do you have an opinion on whether it is more effective to split the dose to twice per day, or does once per day serve the purpose well enough? Perhaps it doesn't even matter.
hotdog23
New Member
2x day will do more to raise IGF-1 levels. But 2x day is further from the bodies natural production/use. Yes more effective IMO, but for long term maybe not more health conscious. Hopefully doc will chime in
Long term natural disruption is also an important factor. I have heard of people running a higher dose EOD or a 5 on 2 off split. I would be curious to hear some of the advantages and disadvantages from a health oriented perspective as well as an anabolic and fat loss oriented perspective.
Similar threads
