Enhanced Testing Database

Respectfully, F you BBBG. Now I gotta copy links to your shit talk over here to MESO. More work for me (it's never done) cause you had to go get banned again.

Given my fairness, I have to port your criticism to MESO for you. Oh the burden of honesty, LOL.
 
Respectfully, F you BBBG. Now I gotta copy links to your shit talk over here to MESO. More work for me (it's never done) cause you had to go get banned again.

Given my fairness, I have to port your criticism to MESO for you. Oh the burden of honesty, LOL.
He was a good asset to here… should convince him to come over… I love how he teared new sources a new one….
 
Thanks for running this sample via GCMS. Curious, no precursor or side product was picked up. 91% purity by HPLC. Just the EQ and MCT/BB.
 
Thanks for running this sample via GCMS. Curious, no precursor or side product was picked up. 91% purity by HPLC. Just the EQ and MCT/BB.


Nice follow up by @MyNameIsJeff.

No precursor or side products. Apparently just BU (90%) and the carboxylic acid (10%) used to make API.

Very nice work testing this raw by GCMS @Qingdao Sigma Chemicals. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Devon One Stop Shop - Us Domestic
Customer blind test Bpc EndotoxinView attachment 311252
Fantastic we are getting some peptide data without any concern of oil interference. Thank you @mongo5165!

 
 
I know everyone focused on the raws shortage, "crisis', whatever right now. But let me take a moment to appreciate the win that the community got here today. Thank you very much for the GCMS testing on 3 raws @Qingdao Sigma Chemicals. 2025 and now we have GCMS data in hand thanks to a few members and QSC (should have 7 results at least in last few months). Thanks for your sample @Dirthand.

So far the most interesting results for follow up are still the Test E and Test C raws from Project 3. Time to put the -ene question to bed and determine if current HPLC method by Jano can distinguish between API and -ene impurity for Test E and Test C.
 
Back
Top