Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very interesting read, thank you
Interesting. So just inject before bed?
I'll have to read through some of his other articles. I like that they're mostly in layman's terms too so i can understand it easily.Not at all the conclusion this article should make you draw, try again.
Also, @Chest last connected here in 2020, he won't reply to you soon.
I have his personal details, we often talk outside of this forum.
I'll admit I just skimmed it, and need to be spoonfed. When is the best time to inject for maximum peak? Doesn't matter?Not at all the conclusion this article should make you draw, try again.
Also, @Chest last connected here in 2020, he won't reply to you soon.
I have his personal details, we often talk outside of this forum.
Think the article is more trying to argue the idea of a morning shot of gh to allow a nighttime release of endogenous gh is silly because your pituitary is shut down for around 24 hours after using exogenous gh.I'll admit I just skimmed it, and need to be spoonfed. When is the best time to inject for maximum peak? Doesn't matter?
Just take your GH and that's good enough. This article is a few years old now. People are arguing different approaches again. I just take it all at night when I get up to pee. That way it's far enough between meals to hopefully avoid insulin resistanceI'll admit I just skimmed it, and need to be spoonfed. When is the best time to inject for maximum peak? Doesn't matter?
I'll admit I just skimmed it, and need to be spoonfed. When is the best time to inject for maximum peak? Doesn't matter?
That's what I thought. Why even bother with pituitary secretions when exogenous amounts of growth in excess of those produced by the pituitary would be coursing through your veins at higher levels than you can produce naturally?Think the article is more trying to argue the idea of a morning shot of gh to allow a nighttime release of endogenous gh is silly because your pituitary is shut down for around 24 hours after using exogenous gh.
Really it’s IV for max peak but screw that. I find IM just feels better in general with gh for me. Less sides, more (at least perceived) benefits. I much prefer it to subq.You're asking the wrong question: for maximum peak: IM, not subq. It's not a question of timing (for maximum peak).
Yeah, agreed, it seems silly to worry about natural pulses when you’re using exogenous.That's what I thought. Why even bother with pituitary secretions when exogenous amounts of growth in excess of those produced by the pituitary would be coursing through your veins at higher levels than you can produce naturally?
That's what I thought. Why even bother with pituitary secretions when exogenous amounts of growth in excess of those produced by the pituitary would be coursing through your veins at higher levels than you can produce naturally?
Because of all the IGF subtypes that are only expressed with endogenous secretions.
The article explains fairly succinctly why your response is silly af. Did you not read it? You’re the one who appears to struggle with reading…I spelled it for you in plain English, not sure what "secret" you didn't catch.
Type-IIX has talked about a negative feedback between secretagogues and hgh. I imagine the long acting nature of mk677 would make it even harder to work into a protocol than something like ipamorelin and mod grf with hgh.New gh user here...apparently I didn't look hard enough to find out if combining secretagogues and hgh would have any benefit.
This is both a poorly written and understood article.New gh user here...apparently I didn't look hard enough to find out if combining secretagogues and hgh would have any benefit. I had better sleep and cosmetic bennies on mk677(25mg) than hgh(2iu) but I wasn't on gear with the mk-677. My idea was to implement the hgh in the am and mk-677 in the pm but it sounds like that would be a waste according to this article.
Thanks to whoever revisited this thread and caused it to pop up on "what's new"
This is both a poorly written and understood article.