FAQ: What do you want to know about the AnabolicLab.com lab testing program?

[tubesox]

Would it be possible to set up a voting system, to decide which labs and compounds are tested next?

For example, I would love to see some of the labs that source on other boards, such as 6 Fingers Pharma. Everyone there acts like it's all hunky dory and the products are bulletproof, seems a tad hard to believe.

Also, do you opt to not test blends such as sustanon and a "cut blend (ten, mast. and test.)" due to the costs of testing for multiple compounds? Another "rumor" on our forums is that blends are never really what they claim to be. I'd like to know if there's something to this claim.

Would really love to see quantitative data on ugl's like legend or domestic x. I second this.

 

[tubesox]

This is an excellent question. Anaboliclab doesn't have an official policy on this. What are your thought? Open feedback please.

On the one hand, it seems like the most courteous thing to do. But does it amount to special treatment?

I think the most important thing is that the bad results will always be posted no matter what. The sellers will not be afforded an opportunity to suppress the results.



I don't think this really concerns AnabolicLab.com (except in cases of defamation). AnabolicLab.com will only provides results of testing. We'll leave it to consumers to judge the companies response and customer service.

I think that they should be contacted, and their response posted in the same page as their product tested. I want to see who's going to make excuses and who will own up to the proof given of a faulty product.

Honestly I'm sick of hearing nothing but excuses from labs. And I think they should have the oppertunity to redeem themselves by sending in another sample for testing. Including the batch number and a guarantee for future products. Make them accountable for their mistakes is what I'd really love to see..

So when I feel something isn't right and I send it off, my money's not wasted.

 

[mkulltra58]

I don't think labs should be contacted. I don't think a magazine or publisher contacts manufactures before or after testing product for review. I think sources should be directed to website regarding questions about AnabolicLab or testing process as much as possible. The less contact the better IMO.

 

[Anabolic5]

How will you combat against sources who might see which AAS are scoring the best, then counterfeiting under-dosed gear with the same names?

What you're doing is great, but this can turn into a major problem if Anabolic Lab becomes more of a major resource for most users. You should seriously considering giving out sources for which that specific gear was acquired from instead of the vague description that you give. Possibly you can offer a monthly subscription option for those who would want to know that info...

 

[Millard]

How will you combat against sources who might see which AAS are scoring the best, then counterfeiting under-dosed gear with the same names?

This is beyond the scope of AnabolicLab. It is the duty and responsibility of the manufacturer to control distribution of its product and identify counterfeiters.

You should seriously considering giving out sources for which that specific gear was acquired from instead of the vague description that you give.

Anaboliclab will do everything it can to AVOID promoting sources for products. It is strictly limited to lab testing for harm reduction. This is a legal necessity.

 

[manafest]

Millard you said it best ..People refuse to let go of their old beliefs that have been parroted year after year without any real actual proof..when you started this board/forum you had very good intentions about AAS in general, however my personal opinion is that Way to many members over time had a set standard without 100% concrete evidence that all UGL's were garbage and so forth and now they will discredit even actual proof to save their beliefs and keep singing the same tune.! Not everyone but seems a lot do..

 

[Millard]

Would it be possible to set up a voting system, to decide which labs and compounds are tested next?

We need feedback and input on the products/manufacturers members are using. But a voting system would likely serve as an announcement or warning to a manufacturer/vendor that its products will soon be tested - and even the specific products at that.

 

[tubesox]

Are the products tested for foreign or unknown substances?