..... or an infected arse!
MESO-Rx
Anabolic Steroids
"Generic" GH ASSAYS
- Thread starter Dr JIM
- Start date
..... or an infected arse!
Hey @noswttea4u , could be wrong but it seems you mean well but understand this is not my rodeo, testing GH.
The difference the fully tr
The difference the fully tr
muscle96ss
Subscriber
I wouldn't make accusations about something you know nothing about. I am sure jano would be willing to provide you with any info you desire as long as that favor is returned in regards to the testing you are performing; which is plenty fair. However, what isn't fair is to cast judgement and throw stones before you have even laid eyes on the data nor know anything about the testing that was performed.
To be fair @muscle96ss although @jano came over asking legit questions about the process he was quick to toss some stones JIM's way. This has to do with history between them both already I'm guessing and that's only speculation.
I would like all to participate and be clairvoyant if all possible in this process.
Night all! Have to hit the gym and eat one more time before I get some Zzzzz's
@muscle96ss I'lol chat with you tomorrow.
mands
Ok GREAT I'll assume Jano was blinded to the samples origin or concentration @Buck1973
and as for my other queries any idea why such info is ENTIRELY ABSENT?
I ask bc such info of this nature is the analytical lab standard and one I willingly complied with when my HPLCs were cited on my second generic GH thread.
It's seems there's a double standard here JANO gets by posting the bare minimum but Dr Jim is held to the LEGITIMATE LAB standard.
Hmm I think the operational word is called BIAS! Or maybe I'm wrong it's all about those Benjamin's.
Last edited:
I'll post a few of what I'm told are Janos HPLCS to highlight the above omissions.
I won't even ask how performance was defined, lol
Its to bad you two cant bury the hatchet and cooperate with each other. The meso community would benefit in a huge way if that were to happen. Oh well!!!? Who cares rt? As long as you come out the winner of the argument , fuck what coulda been.
And to you guys tossing insults at jano, that dont know the first thing about gh, ( never used and never studied it)PLEASE STOP!!!! Your making yourself look foolish. Not naming names but if the shoe fits..........
I think Dr JIM and a few others are qualified to debate him the rest just look like dick riders.
And to you guys tossing insults at jano, that dont know the first thing about gh, ( never used and never studied it)PLEASE STOP!!!! Your making yourself look foolish. Not naming names but if the shoe fits..........
I think Dr JIM and a few others are qualified to debate him the rest just look like dick riders.
What you have yet clarified is WHO sent these samples to Jano.
Bc it's my understanding all of our samples are being donated by consumers themselves not that UGL would have reason to spike a sample, right.
Who are you and what have you done to my dearly beloved Mr.B66???? Lolol
Sounds like somebody needs a Snickers bar. You're not yourself when you're hungry.
Who are you and what have you done to my dearly beloved Mr.B66???? Lolol
I know. Im just so irritated at all the fuckin mud slinging. Not by Jim, but by all the noobs trying to be his buddy. Dont they know that im the only guy Jim wants to be buddies with[emoji15]
Who are you and what have you done to my dearly beloved Mr.B66???? Lolol
But besides all that, good to see you my friend , been a while. I hope everything is going great for you Doc.
I have no interest in cooperating with someone that produced fake data for an ugl. Nor am I interested in cooperating with a so called lab tech with a such a limited understanding of biochemistry that he wasn't even aware that a biological assay is still needed to confirm that you actually have rhGH - and had to be corrected by Karl, of all people.
I wish you would have named names, B66. That way I would know whether I should be pissed off at you or not.
Bc Meso and PM don't "play" by the same rules, and reasons should be obvious fella!
muscle96ss
Subscriber
I personally would be willing to put the past in the past and work together for the better of the entire community. Buck who has posted in this thread was part of the trio at PM that supervised our lab testing project. I am pretty sure he would be willing to work together as well. Jano is independent and does not represent any specific board and I am sure he would be willing to work together as well. So I don't see any reason why this cannot be accomplished. We are all here for the same reasons. So much more can be accomplished if we can find a way to pool our resources and work together instead of in opposition.
I have no interest in cooperating with someone that produced fake data for an ugl. Nor am I interested in cooperating with a so called lab tech with a such a limited understanding of biochemistry that he wasn't even aware that a biological assay is still needed to confirm that you actually have rhGH - and had to be corrected by Karl, of all people.
I wish you would have named names, B66. That way I would know whether I should be pissed off at you or not.
FUCK!!!!!! The last thing i want is YOU pissed off at me[emoji15]
And BTW JIM has already set me strait. I shall restrain myself henceforth [emoji4]
These are Jano's HPLCs as cited on PM, perhaps he can answer my questions rather than post another deflection, detour, or will simply deny such info is the contemporary lab standard.
The reason such information is CRITICAL; bc what one is left with in it's absence is A LOT of "raw data" without a means of correlating numerical or percentile values into something useful, a specific MANUFACTURERS SAMPLE, or it's concentration in mg.
Im sorry guys but I honestly don't know what the intent was, but the results are ANYTHING but transparent or readable from an evidence based perspective.
Last edited:
