Gramps
New Member
Exactly! And the ones that get my attention are the ones the fess up when they aren't perfect and strive to improve. My list of labs claiming all is good in the world (and will never get a dime from me) is much larger than my list of possible good labs. That's where you failed and moved to that other list. When confronted with bogus test results, you shrugged it off as normal and lost all credibility. You might luck out and show good bloodwork, but you took a left turn in lying to make the sales to get there.Or may be you can name an UGL that did not have a single issue ever? You can't.
I don't support ANY lab at the moment - the few I'm talking with all agree to the questionable raws and adjust based on bloods. That's not the best, but it's much better than spitting bogus labs and working from them. Who's more blind here?I wish you luck with the UGL from the guy you trust because even this guy doesn't know what he gets without HPLC.
By putting you on the spot and pointing out a lie makes me either a liar or a thief?? WTF are you smoking?? I fucking GUARANTEE THESE ARE LIES, though, as 106.5% is a mathmatic impossibility and raises tons of questions on what/how things are done at your labs. You're the only one with anything to lose here. Good job in keeping these posts alive! I was done a few days ago, but you just feel the need to "fix things". Feel free to respond and expanding your accusations. I'm sure it's good for your business...You can trust our labs, you can doubt them. I said doubt because if you think you are 100% sure these lab reports are lies, you are one of the 2 forms of life you described above.